search for: reuqir

Hello, i got an error while configuring samba on solaris 5.8: lib/smbldap.c: In function `smbldap_connect_system': lib/smbldap.c:770: warning: passing arg 2 of `ldap_set_rebind_proc' from incompatible pointer type lib/smbldap.c:770: error: too few arguments to function `ldap_set_rebind_proc' make: *** [lib/smbldap.o] Error 1 As 3.0.20b is configuring without this error, are there

Here are the items removed when removing postfix: Nov 1 09:56:59 localhost yum[22042]: Erased: google-chrome-stable Nov 1 09:57:00 localhost yum[22042]: Erased: redhat-lsb-compat Nov 1 09:57:00 localhost yum[22042]: Erased: redhat-lsb Nov 1 09:57:01 localhost yum[22042]: Erased: redhat-lsb-graphics Nov 1 09:57:01 localhost yum[22042]: Erased: redhat-lsb-printing Nov 1 09:57:02 localhost

...storage. Apps needing large storage capacities will usually be given an explicit volume they can use for this purpose. NB, the provided volume may be persistent across container boots, or it may be freshly formatted on every boot. Whomever configures the container decides this based on the usage reuqirements of whatever app is to be run in the container. > I do not see what makes v2vovl*.qcow2 files so special in this regard, > requiring them to be handled specially than other big temporary files > already stored by libguestfs/virt-v2v. Examples: > - the appliance > - the tempora...

Currently the virtio_ring structure are not declared packed, but they describe an hardware like interface. We should not allow compilers to make alignments and optimizations that can be different between the guest and host compiler. I propose to declare all structures that are in shared memory as packed. Does anybody see a problem with packed? Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger

Currently the virtio_ring structure are not declared packed, but they describe an hardware like interface. We should not allow compilers to make alignments and optimizations that can be different between the guest and host compiler. I propose to declare all structures that are in shared memory as packed. Does anybody see a problem with packed? Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger

...arge storage > capacities will usually be given an explicit volume they can > use for this purpose. NB, the provided volume may be persistent > across container boots, or it may be freshly formatted on every > boot. Whomever configures the container decides this based on > the usage reuqirements of whatever app is to be run in the > container. Sure, I agree with that. The important thing is still that that you need to have space for the temporary files somewhere: be it /var/tmp, /mnt/scratch, whatever. Because of this, and the fact that usually containers are created fresh, the...

...quot;cx"> </span><del>-// Strategy for top-level frames - these are destroyed automatically. </del><ins>+// Strategy for top-level frames - these are destroyed +// automatically. Marking is the same as for Windows, plus preservation +// of the associated MenuBar, if reuqired. </ins><span class="cx"> %define GC_MANAGE_AS_FRAME(kls) </span><span class="cx"> GC_NEVER(kls); </span><span class="cx"> // Mark any associated sizer </span><del>-%feature("markfunc") kls "GC_mark_wxWind...

On Thu, Apr 02, 2020 at 03:21:14PM +0200, Pino Toscano wrote: > On Thursday, 2 April 2020 14:49:18 CEST Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > Previously we placed large files in g#get_cachedir () (usually > > /var/tmp). However the problem is this ties the libguestfs appliance > > and the virt-v2v overlay files to the same location. > > > > When virt-v2v is run in a