Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "reuiqrements".
Did you mean:
reuiqrement
2008 Jan 17
1
[LLVMdev] Still Another LiveInterval Question
...ue number is if they participate in 2-address instructions where a copy had
to be introduced to satisfy the read-write requirements of the instruction?
And further, in that case, LiveIntervals for virtual registers should only
have at most two value numbers?
How about on targets without these reuiqrements? Should LiveIntervals for
virtual registers only ever have one value number?
-Dave
2013 Jan 14
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: Codifying (but not formalizing) the optimization levels in LLVM and Clang
Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at gmail.com> writes:
> 4) Good, well-balanced optimizations, or '-O2'
> - Attribute: opt (new attribute)
Since all other levels have a qualifier, I'd suggest we do that here as
well. Perhaps balancedopt?
> 5) Optimize to the max or '-O3'
> - Attribute: maxopt (new attribute)
> - Goal: produce the fastest binary possible.
2013 Jan 14
17
[LLVMdev] RFC: Codifying (but not formalizing) the optimization levels in LLVM and Clang
This has been an idea floating around in my head for a while and after
several discussions with others it continues to hold up so I thought I
would mail it out. Sorry for cross posting to both lists, but this is an
issue that would significantly impact both LLVM and Clang.
Essentially, LLVM provides canned optimization "levels" for frontends to
re-use. This is nothing new. However, we