search for: retying

Hi Dylan, looks ok now. One thing: the ISR is now: __vector_21: ; @__vector_21 __vector_21$local: sei push r0 push r1 in r0, 63 push r0 clr r0 push r24 lds r24, v1 sts v2, r24 pop r24 pop r0 out 63, r0 pop r1 pop r0 reti There are unneccessary push/pops of r1 and r0 too, since the clr is useless ... GCC had the same

Hi Dylan, the following code volatile uint8_t v1; volatile uint8_t v2; __attribute__((interrupt)) void __vector_21(void) { v2 = v1; } produces in C mode: 00000092 <__vector_21>: 92: 80 91 61 00 lds r24, 0x0061 ; 0x800061 <v1> 96: 80 93 60 00 sts 0x0060, r24 ; 0x800060 <__data_end> 9a: 08 95 ret and in C++ mode: 00000074

Hey Wilhelm, That's a bug, the "interrupt" attribute is not being recognized by the backend. I have fixed it in https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/339b34266c1b54a9b5ff2f83cfb1da9cd8c9d90a Pull the latest LLVM and it should be fixed. On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 8:00 AM Wilhelm Meier <wilhelm.meier at hs-kl.de> wrote: > Hi Dylan, > > I used the following

Hey Wilhelm, Could you post the LLVM IR generated from your C++ file? This can be achieved with 'clang -S -emit-llvm' Cheers On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 6:36 PM Wilhelm Meier <wilhelm.meier at hs-kl.de> wrote: > Answering partly to myself there was a extern "C" missing. > > But the register pushes ans reti are still missing. > > Whats wrong? > > Am

Hello everyone, Reposting with after having applied the (minor) fixes suggested by Wei and Jan. Allen, if you can tell us what you think about this, or suggest someone else to ask some feedback to, if you''re no longer involved with VT-d, that would be great! :-) -- As already discussed here [1], dealing with IOMMU faults in interrupt context may cause nasty things to happen, up to

Is there anything I can do about it? BTW: gcc is loosing the AVR backend, so I would assume, there will be a greater interest to this in llvm compared to the past. Thanks, Wilhelm Am 03.04.20 um 15:09 schrieb Wilhelm Meier via llvm-dev: > Should I create an issue in bugzilla for this? Just to be reminded ... > > Am 31.03.20 um 09:34 schrieb Wilhelm Meier via llvm-dev: >> Hi

On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Dario Faggioli <raistlin@linux.it> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > This series changes how locks are dealt with while adjusting domains'' > scheduling parameters. > > I''ve done and am still doing tests for credit and credit2, and it''s > surviving to all I threw at it up to now. Unfortunately, I can''t test >

Am 04.03.20 um 13:28 schrieb Dylan McKay: > > * *The C/C++ function needs to be declared with either the calling > convention avr-interrupt or avr-non-blocking-interrupt.* Skipping > this step will cause regular ret instructions to be emitted for > return-from-subroutine, instead of the required reti for interrupt > handlers. ISRs also have stricter

Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> writes: > the interrupt handler itself is a parameterless procedure that does not > return a value. As such, I guess calling conventions and so forth are > not very relevant for it :) In any case llvm-gcc and gcc mainline seem > to output the interrupt handler as an ordinary function on > x86-32-linux. There can be significant differences

Hi Alex, > Assuming that that support for Ada in LLVM is complete, I would look to > see if there is something that is done there. Ada provides two pragmas > (Interrupt_Handler & Attach_Handler) which allow you to both statically > and dynamically attach interrupts to procedures. the interrupt handler itself is a parameterless procedure that does not return a value. As such,

On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 05:36:27PM +0200, Dario Faggioli wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I''m trying to setup PCI-passthrough for a network card on a testbox. > With HVM, everything seems to work, while if I try with a pv-guest the > domain crashes! > > Here''s the thing: > -- > # xl pci-list-assignable-devices > 0000:07:00.0 > 0000:07:00.1 > >

If the clients login locally and not in a domain. Then tell you users to use .\loginname Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: Alberto Maria Fiaschi [mailto:alberto.fiaschi at estar.toscana.it] > Verzonden: vrijdag 11 januari 2019 10:16 > Aan: L.P.H. van Belle > CC: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] upgrade to 4.8.3 authentication not

On Jul 24, 2009, at 8:47 AM, Jakob Stoklund Olesen wrote: > Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> writes: > >> the interrupt handler itself is a parameterless procedure that does >> not >> return a value. As such, I guess calling conventions and so forth >> are >> not very relevant for it :) In any case llvm-gcc and gcc mainline >> seem

Dear Sirs, I'm looking for the DLL version of Speex, to study very quickly the possible integration of this interesting voice oriented CODEC into our application. We develop, mainly, in Delphi. We use C++ only to develop firmware for our RF transcievers. I saw on the Speex.org website that there is a Delphi program\porting, but this dll is missing there. Can you help me about this? It will

I updated a centos 7 without changing the samba configuration. Before authentication worked even without having to specify the domain to the logon. After the update, on the other hand, it is mandatory to specify the domain. user password: not work. domain \ user password work. I have 5000 windows (xp / 7/10) clients not in domain. Client workgroups are varied. Users are not expert at all and

How about setting: map untrusted to domain = yes The default changed here. But it would still help if we could see the smb.conf as the big difference with 4.8 is that winbind needs to run now. This might also do something like this. Regards Christian Am 11.01.19 um 10:46 schrieb L.P.H. van Belle via samba: > I gave you the most simple option. > > And the difference is. >

put map untrusted to domain = yes in smb.conf and strarted winbind. Now work !!!  nice -n '-20'  yes 'thanks a lot' Buda Il 11/01/19 10:56, Christian Naumer via samba ha scritto: > How about setting: > > map untrusted to domain = yes > > The default changed here. But it would still help if we could see the > smb.conf as the big difference with 4.8 is that

Hi all, after upgrading from 13.7 to 14.2, asterisk cli (asterisk -r) don't show what's happens. I've trying setting debug and verbose to 100 but nothing, no show. All commands works as expected but i can't what's happens on my asterisk server. asterisk*CLI> core show settings PBX Core settings ----------------- Version: 14.2.0 Build Options:

I gave you the most simple option. And the difference is. myserverdomain\username works only on that server. (myserverdomain) .\username works on any server where the loginname and password are the same. There is NO other option for you that i know off. (sorry) Yes.. the other option is, setup an AD domain. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba

Hi, Could anyone help I'm getting the following error when I tried to add a new network interface. DETAILS Connection --------------------------- import libvirt conn = libvirt.open('qemu:///system') Interface XML ---------------------- <interface type="bridge" name="br0"> <start mode="onboot"/> <mtu size="1500"/>