search for: rettype

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 44 matches for "rettype".

Did you mean: gettype
2017 Oct 04
0
[PATCH 08/13] x86/paravirt: Clean up paravirt_types.h
...#define PV_ALT_SITE(oldinstr, newinstr) \ + _PV_ALT_SITE(oldinstr, newinstr, PV_TYPE_CONSTRAINT_STR, \ + PV_CLBR_CONSTRAINT_STR) /* * These macros are intended to wrap calls through one of the paravirt @@ -525,25 +531,24 @@ int paravirt_disable_iospace(void); #define ____PVOP_CALL(rettype, op, clbr, call_clbr, extra_clbr, \ pre, post, ...) \ - ({ \ - rettype __ret; \ - PVOP_CALL_ARGS; \ - PVOP_TEST_NULL(op); \ +({ \ + rettype __ret; \ + PVOP_CALL_ARGS; \ + PVOP_TEST_NULL(op); \ asm volatile(pre \ - paravirt...
2007 Apr 18
0
[PATCH] paravirt_ops: Clean up paravirt patchable wrappers
...= --- a/include/asm-i386/paravirt.h +++ b/include/asm-i386/paravirt.h @@ -332,210 +332,80 @@ unsigned paravirt_patch_insns(void *site * means that all uses must be wrapped in inline functions. This also * makes sure the incoming and outgoing types are always correct. */ -#define PVOP_CALL0(__rettype, __op) \ +#define __PVOP_CALL(rettype, op, pre, post, ...) \ ({ \ - __rettype __ret; \ - if (sizeof(__rettype) > sizeof(unsigned long)) { \ - unsigned long long __tmp; \ - unsigned long __ecx; \ - asm volatile(paravirt_alt(PARAVIRT_CALL) \ - : "=A&quo...
2007 Apr 18
0
[PATCH] paravirt_ops: Clean up paravirt patchable wrappers
...= --- a/include/asm-i386/paravirt.h +++ b/include/asm-i386/paravirt.h @@ -332,210 +332,80 @@ unsigned paravirt_patch_insns(void *site * means that all uses must be wrapped in inline functions. This also * makes sure the incoming and outgoing types are always correct. */ -#define PVOP_CALL0(__rettype, __op) \ +#define __PVOP_CALL(rettype, op, pre, post, ...) \ ({ \ - __rettype __ret; \ - if (sizeof(__rettype) > sizeof(unsigned long)) { \ - unsigned long long __tmp; \ - unsigned long __ecx; \ - asm volatile(paravirt_alt(PARAVIRT_CALL) \ - : "=A&quo...
2017 Oct 04
1
[PATCH 11/13] x86/paravirt: Add paravirt alternatives infrastructure
...\ + ".popsection\n" \ + #define PARAVIRT_PATCH(x) \ (offsetof(struct paravirt_patch_template, x) / sizeof(void *)) @@ -559,6 +586,33 @@ int paravirt_disable_iospace(void); PVOP_CALLEE_OUTPUTS, , \ pre, post, ##__VA_ARGS__) +#define ____PVOP_ALT_CALL(rettype, native, op, clbr, call_clbr, \ + extra_clbr, ...) \ +({ \ + rettype __ret; \ + PVOP_CALL_ARGS; \ + PVOP_TEST_NULL(op); \ + asm volatile(PV_ALT_SITE(native, PV_CALL_STR) \ + : call_clbr, ASM_CALL_CONSTRAINT \ + : PV_INPUT_CONSTRAINTS(op, clbr), \...
2016 Dec 08
3
[PATCH 0/2] Fix paravirt fail
Two patches that cure fallout from commit: 3cded4179481 ("x86/paravirt: Optimize native pv_lock_ops.vcpu_is_preempted()")
2016 Dec 08
3
[PATCH 0/2] Fix paravirt fail
Two patches that cure fallout from commit: 3cded4179481 ("x86/paravirt: Optimize native pv_lock_ops.vcpu_is_preempted()")
2017 Oct 04
0
[PATCH 07/13] x86/paravirt: Simplify ____PVOP_CALL()
...), 23 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h index ab7aabe6b668..01f9e10983c1 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h @@ -529,29 +529,19 @@ int paravirt_disable_iospace(void); rettype __ret; \ PVOP_CALL_ARGS; \ PVOP_TEST_NULL(op); \ - /* This is 32-bit specific, but is okay in 64-bit */ \ - /* since this condition will never hold */ \ - if (sizeof(rettype) > sizeof(unsigned long)) { \ - asm volatile(pre \ - paravirt_alt(PARAVIRT_CALL) \ -...
2016 Dec 08
0
[PATCH 2/2] x86, paravirt: Fix bool return type for PVOP_CALL
Commit 3cded4179481 ("x86/paravirt: Optimize native pv_lock_ops.vcpu_is_preempted()") introduced a paravirt op with bool return type [*] It turns out that the PVOP_CALL*() macros miscompile when rettype is bool. Code that looked like: 83 ef 01 sub $0x1,%edi ff 15 32 a0 d8 00 callq *0xd8a032(%rip) # ffffffff81e28120 <pv_lock_ops+0x20> 84 c0 test %al,%al ended up looking like so after PVOP_CALL1() was applied: 83 ef 01...
2006 May 31
1
[LLVMdev] InstVisitor: RetType
Hi, the docs for InstVisitor say that if RetType != void, one has to override visitInstruction. What is the reason for that? It's valid to define visitInstruction like that: RetTy visitInstruction(Instruction &I) { return RetTy(); } so assuming RetTy has a sensible default constructor, user won't need to override visitInstructio...
2017 Oct 04
31
[PATCH 00/13] x86/paravirt: Make pv ops code generation more closely match reality
This changes the pv ops code generation to more closely match reality. For example, instead of: callq *0xffffffff81e3a400 (pv_irq_ops.save_fl) vmlinux will now show: pushfq pop %rax nop nop nop nop nop which is what the runtime version of the code will show in most cases. This idea was suggested by Andy Lutomirski. The benefits are: - For the most common runtime cases
2017 Oct 04
31
[PATCH 00/13] x86/paravirt: Make pv ops code generation more closely match reality
This changes the pv ops code generation to more closely match reality. For example, instead of: callq *0xffffffff81e3a400 (pv_irq_ops.save_fl) vmlinux will now show: pushfq pop %rax nop nop nop nop nop which is what the runtime version of the code will show in most cases. This idea was suggested by Andy Lutomirski. The benefits are: - For the most common runtime cases
2004 Mar 02
3
error() and C++ destructors
Hi, I am writing C++ functions that are to be called via .Call() interface. I'd been using error() (from R.h) to return to R if there is an error, but then I realized that this might be not safe as supposedly error() doesn't throw an exception and therefore some destructors do not get called and some memory may leak. Here is a simple example extern "C" void foo() { string
2013 Dec 04
0
[LLVMdev] Newbie question: LLVM IR, printf, and varargs
...call is a function pointer type, then that is used *as the type of the thing being called*, while if it's not, then it is used *as the return type*, and the type of the call is inferred from the arguments present on the instruction. See this chunk of code in lib/AsmParser/LLParser.cpp: // If RetType is a non-function pointer type, then this is the short syntax // for the call, which means that RetType is just the return type. Infer the // rest of the function argument types from the arguments that are present. PointerType *PFTy = 0; FunctionType *Ty = 0; if (!(PFTy = dyn_cast<Poi...
2017 Oct 04
1
[PATCH 02/13] x86/paravirt: Fix output constraint macro names
...E_OUTPUTS #define EXTRA_CLOBBERS , "r8", "r9", "r10", "r11" #define VEXTRA_CLOBBERS , "rax", "r8", "r9", "r10", "r11" @@ -552,12 +552,12 @@ int paravirt_disable_iospace(void); }) #define __PVOP_CALL(rettype, op, pre, post, ...) \ - ____PVOP_CALL(rettype, op, CLBR_ANY, PVOP_CALL_CLOBBERS, \ + ____PVOP_CALL(rettype, op, CLBR_ANY, PVOP_CALL_OUTPUTS, \ EXTRA_CLOBBERS, pre, post, ##__VA_ARGS__) #define __PVOP_CALLEESAVE(rettype, op, pre, post, ...) \ ____PVOP_CALL(rettype, op.func, CLBR_...
2013 Dec 03
2
[LLVMdev] Newbie question: LLVM IR, printf, and varargs
Whoops... Seems I forgot the asterisk (*) after the cast. Or something. Because I did insert the cast and it didn't work. But NOW it works. Thank you for spending some time on this - and also for presenting the solution. -- Mikael 2013/12/4 Eli Bendersky <eliben at google.com> > This code: > > declare i32 @printf(i8* nocapture readonly, ...) nounwind > > define
2007 Dec 20
6
[PATCH 0/15] adjust pvops to accomodate its x86_64 variant
Hi folks, With this series, the bulk of the work of pvops64 is done. Here, I integrate most of the paravirt.c and paravirt.h files, making them applicable to both architectures. CONFIG_PARAVIRT is _not_ present yet. Basically, this code is missing page table integration (patches currently being worked on by Jeremy). Enjoy
2007 Dec 20
6
[PATCH 0/15] adjust pvops to accomodate its x86_64 variant
Hi folks, With this series, the bulk of the work of pvops64 is done. Here, I integrate most of the paravirt.c and paravirt.h files, making them applicable to both architectures. CONFIG_PARAVIRT is _not_ present yet. Basically, this code is missing page table integration (patches currently being worked on by Jeremy). Enjoy
2016 Dec 08
1
[PATCH 2/2] x86, paravirt: Fix bool return type for PVOP_CALL
hi, Peter I think I know the point. then could we just let __eax rettype(here is bool), not unsigned long? I does not do tests for my thoughts. @@ -461,7 +461,9 @@ int paravirt_disable_iospace(void); #define PVOP_VCALL_ARGS \ unsigned long __eax = __eax, __edx = __edx, __ecx = __ecx; \ regi...
2016 Dec 08
1
[PATCH 2/2] x86, paravirt: Fix bool return type for PVOP_CALL
hi, Peter I think I know the point. then could we just let __eax rettype(here is bool), not unsigned long? I does not do tests for my thoughts. @@ -461,7 +461,9 @@ int paravirt_disable_iospace(void); #define PVOP_VCALL_ARGS \ unsigned long __eax = __eax, __edx = __edx, __ecx = __ecx; \ regi...
2007 Apr 19
3
[RFC, PATCH 1/5] Paravirt_ops full patching.patch
...pecify * the return type. The macro then uses sizeof() on that type to @@ -405,6 +404,21 @@ unsigned paravirt_patch_insns(void *site "0" ((u32)(arg1)), "1" ((u32)(arg2)), \ "2" ((u32)(arg3)), [_arg4] "mr" ((u32)(arg4))) +#define PVOP_CALL5(rettype, op, arg1, arg2, arg3, arg4, arg5) \ + __PVOP_CALL(rettype, op, \ + "push %[_arg5]; push %[_arg4];", \ + "lea 8(%%esp),%%esp;", \ + "0" ((u32)(arg1)), "1" ((u32)(arg2)), \ + "2" ((u32)(arg3)), [_arg4] "mr" ((...