search for: retract

Another point of disparity between how I see others write Puppet manifests and the Best Practice that I''ve adopted at my institution is the use of quoting. In Puppet, you can get away with not quoting values or references if there isn''t a special character or a keyword being used (e.g. package { openssh: ...} or User[agirl]). However, even though that is possible, to make

I need some help: I currently have userids setup under the existing false rooted ftp account setups without shells. I would like to convert them to use OpenSSH sftp. Can I give them restricted shells so they can't cd to other user's directories and only allow them to sftp , and how do I accomplish this ?. Also, can I use the "force" option on the authorized_keys2 file

Howdy all: Thanks to Jerry Carter for correcting some of my earlier babbling. And thanks to Stephen Langasek <vorlon@netexpress.net> and "Sean E. Millichamp" <sean@compu-aid.com> for setting the record straight on PAM support: > I said (without checking first): > > PAM should already be installed on *any* linux distribution (it's > > standard on linux

I did not understand the man pages for sudo and incorrectly interpreted the results. I interpreted the ALL to apply to all commands defined in the sudoers file. Basically, I'm an idiot, but here is the chain I followed, and the correct interpretation. In the man pages on sudo, it says the following: A User_List is made up of one or more usernames, uids (prefixed with

...23.01.2013 00:45, Eli Bendersky wrote: > I do mean semantic extraction which provides a representation that's > meaningful to a user and hence can be effectively compared in a test. > But really, I gave up arguing on this topic a few messages (and heated > IRC discussions) ago. RFC retracted. I actually hit the same predicament for COFF. The few tests that are there usually use coff-dump.py whose output is quite limited (many tests just compare a binary dump), does not include unwind information, and is very different from elf-dump. Then there's llvm-objdump, which does resolve...

Dear Mongrel Users, It appears that Francis still isn''t satisfied with my attempts to apologize and he''s now asked me privately to retract my statements. So, just to be sure he finally gets it: I retract my statements that Francis and his friends are "shady" and "desperate for cash". He is in no way a shady guy, having dealt with this situation with the utmost of professionalism and courtesy with me. He is also...

...*, even though > semantic extraction is more difficult. I do mean semantic extraction which provides a representation that's meaningful to a user and hence can be effectively compared in a test. But really, I gave up arguing on this topic a few messages (and heated IRC discussions) ago. RFC retracted. > > In any case, I mention the above project (google-breakpad) because i'd > be more than happy to get that DWARF related code relicensed to the > LLVM license if someone wanted it. >> This is utterly impossible because your code does not start variables with a capital! S...

Hi All, Well, it <http://goo.gl/hzxyw> was too good to be true. Under extreme, extended IO on a 48core node, some part of the the NFS stack collapses and leads to an IO lockup thru NFS. We've replicated it on 48core and 64 core nodes, but don't know yet whether it acts similarly on lower-core-count nodes. Tho I haven't had time to figure out exactly /how/ it collapses, I

Mainline commit d4f7e650e55af6b235871126f747da88600e8040 attempts to delay the dlm_thread from sending the drop ref message if the lockres is being migrated. The problem is that we make the dlm_thread wait for the migration to complete. This causes a deadlock as dlm_thread also participates in the lockres migration process. A better fix for the original oss bugzilla#1012 is in testing.

...ining over time, or are otherwise so new that there is not yet a > > good read on whether they can be made permanent. > > Documentation/process/stable-api-nonsense.rst That document has failed to preclude symbol export fights in the past and there is a reasonable argument to try not to retract functionality that had been previously exported regardless of that document. > Really. If you want to play with GPL vs. EXPORT_SYMBOL else this is up > to you but I do not see any technical argument to make this particular > interface to the page allocator any different from all others th...

On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 4:00 PM, Eli Bendersky <eliben at google.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > While working on some recent patches for x32 support, I ran into an > unpleasant limitation the LLVM eco-system has with testing DWARF > emission. We currently have several approaches, neither of which is > great: > > 1. llvm-dwarfdump: the best approach when it works. But

...e a read receipt request when sending the voice mail message. Write a script, triggered from a sendmail alias or .forward file, that will parse the incoming receipts and handle the message deletion. Bonus points: When someone listens to the message on the voicemail server, send an Outlook message retraction request.

...command or function to withdraw a command performed already in R? For instance, after drawing a line in existing plot, can I remove the line in the plot? I know I can use a way of overlapping on the former line so that it looks like a removing the line, but I'm wondering there is a command to retract the already performed command. Thanks. YN [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

> From: Douglas Bates [mailto:bates at bates4.stat.wisc.edu] > > "Liaw, Andy" <andy_liaw at merck.com> writes: > > > Sorry. I need to retract my claim. There seems to be a 3G > limit, even > > though the OS could handle nearly 8G. (I can have two > simultaneous R > > processes each using near 3G.) > > > > On another note, on our dual Opteron box R (compiled as > 64-bit) could easily > > use ne...

> From: Douglas Bates [mailto:bates at bates4.stat.wisc.edu] > > "Liaw, Andy" <andy_liaw at merck.com> writes: > > > Sorry. I need to retract my claim. There seems to be a 3G > limit, even > > though the OS could handle nearly 8G. (I can have two > simultaneous R > > processes each using near 3G.) > > > > On another note, on our dual Opteron box R (compiled as > 64-bit) could easily > > use ne...

...kernel.org> wrote: > > On Tue 25-06-19 12:52:18, Dan Williams wrote: > [...] > > > Documentation/process/stable-api-nonsense.rst > > > > That document has failed to preclude symbol export fights in the past > > and there is a reasonable argument to try not to retract functionality > > that had been previously exported regardless of that document. > > Can you point me to any specific example where this would be the case > for the core kernel symbols please? The most recent example that comes to mind was the thrash around __kernel_fpu_{begin,end}...

...500 type: ID_TYPE_UID xidNumber: 0 distinguishedName: CN=S-1-5-21-2025076216-3455336656-3842161122-500 Oh look it is mapped to '0' i.e. 'root' > > So the winbind devs obviously also thinks that Administrator should be > mapped like every other domain user. Do you want to retract that last statement ? > The nice thing about this is that RFC2307 enabled winbind hosts, > sssd-ad hosts and winbind hosts still using RID can all coexist > peacefully and with the same UID/GID mapping (a need I had, thus > creating the need for the migration script). > > But as...

Hi wxRuby 1.9.7 is now available from rubyforge. This release is mainly to restore one-step gem installation for Windows users, so they can easily benefit from the many enhancements and fixes that were included in 1.9.6. The gem will now install Microsoft''s VC version 8.0 dlls. As usual ''gem install wxruby'' should get you the latest version. For users on Linux and

...On the other hand, this might create a bunch > > of dead-register-dependency special cases in CodeGen which would > > not be worth the effort. What do you think? > > I am not sure I follow completely, but it sounds like it would be > quite fragile? I think you're right, I retract my suggestion. Thanks again, Hal > > /jakob > -- Hal Finkel Postdoctoral Appointee Leadership Computing Facility Argonne National Laboratory

...he described objective is still in the works, I have stumbled upon what I believe to be a critical issue with the handling of negative rights in the present ACL plugin - to be precise, the cache component of it handles them in the exact same way as it does positive rights, thus granting rather than retracting the individual privileges. To fix this, go to src/plugins/acl/acl-cache.c:391. The line and the one following it should read p[j] |= obj_cache->my_neg_rights[i]->mask[j]; Replace that to read p[j] &= ~obj_cache->my_neg_rights[i]->mask[j]; I hope this information...