search for: retra

Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "retra".

Did you mean: retry
2019 Nov 20
2
Schema replication error with W2008R2
...de DSA: db85dd66-8b46-43d6-8da3-f12447ed66c6 ==== VECINOS DE ENTRADA ====================================== DC=eadom,DC=ea Default-First-Site-Name\MERCURIO7 v?a RPC GUID del objeto DSA: e644a216-b852-4303-ad3c-09e5733b7233 El ?ltimo intento, efectuado el 2019-11-20 10:29:58, se retras? por una raz?n normal, resultado 8418 (0x20e2): Error en la operaci?n de replicaci?n debido a que no coinciden los esquemas entre los servidores implicados. ?ltima operaci?n correcta efectuada el 2019-11-17 21:45:40. Defau...
2018 Sep 21
2
[GlobalISel] Legalize generic instructions that also depend on type of scalar, not only scalar size
Hi, Mips32 has 64 bit floating point instructions, while i64 instructions have to be emulated with i32 instructions. This means that G_LOAD should be custom legalized for s64 integer value, and be legal for s64 floating point value. There are also other generic instructions with the same problem: G_STORE, G_SELECT, G_EXTRACT, and G_INSERT. There are also other configurations where integer
2014 Apr 22
3
[LLVMdev] adding comment
...hineInstr::FastISel) to set the flag. Some passes seem to be stripping the comment flags though. The one I noticed is the pseudo-instruction expansion pass: # *** IR Dump After Machine Copy Propagation Pass ***: # Machine code for function retfloat: Post SSA BB#0: derived from LLVM BB %entry RetRA; comment-flags: FastISel # End machine code for function retfloat. # *** IR Dump After Post-RA pseudo instruction expansion pass ***: # Machine code for function retfloat: Post SSA BB#0: derived from LLVM BB %entry RET %RA # End machine code for function retfloat. > -----Original Mes...
2014 Apr 17
2
[LLVMdev] adding comment
Would adding a flag to MachineInstr::MIFlag do the trick? I'm thinking that fast isel could ensure that a flag (e.g. MIFlag::FastISel) is added to the instructions it creates, then the instruction printer could optionally emit a comment for instructions that have this flag. > -----Original Message----- > From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] >
2015 Aug 25
2
[LLVMdev] TableGen Register Class not matching for MI in 3.6
BB#0: derived from LLVM BB %entry %vreg0<def> = MOV16Copy_IMM_REG <ga:@a+1>[TF=1]; GPRRegs:%vreg0 %vreg1<def> = COPY %vreg0; PTRRegs:%vreg1 GPRRegs:%vreg0 Send_iii %NULLR0, %vreg1<kill>, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0; PTRRegs:%vreg1 RetRA This is what I get. This is what I'd like to get: BB#0: derived from LLVM BB %entry %vreg0<def> = MOV16Copy_IMM_REG <ga:@a+1>[TF=1]; PTRRegs:%vreg0 Send_iii %NULLR0, %vreg1<kill>, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0; PTRRegs:%vreg0 RetRA On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 3:56 PM, Quentin Colombet &...
2015 Aug 25
2
[LLVMdev] TableGen Register Class not matching for MI in 3.6
AddRegisterOperand calls getVR and yes, I think an IMPLICIT_DEF is being generated. On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 2:40 PM, Quentin Colombet <qcolombet at apple.com> wrote: > > On Aug 25, 2015, at 11:05 AM, Ryan Taylor <ryta1203 at gmail.com> wrote: > > I have not tried 3.5, it's a significant amount of work to port from one > version to the next though, I did not