search for: rethinking

I feel the need to apologize for my previous email to the list. I was thinking that I was sharing something that I am currently exited with, with my associates. I now realize that I was sooo... off-topic, it's ridiculous. Sorry for the improper post to the list. Feel free to keep any further comments, concerning my improper use of the list, off-list. Thank You, Steven B TeamVie at

I spent the last couple of days rethinking how we go about building the appliance, and the difficulties we have porting that to other Linux distros. I've come up with a much better way that works better and faster on (so far) Fedora and Debian (probably on Ubuntu too, not tried it), and should be much simpler to port to other distros....

Dear All, I've read Thomas Lumley's fortune "If the answer is parse() you should usually rethink the question.". But I am not sure it that also applies (and why) to other situations (Lumley's comment http://tolstoy.newcastle.edu.au/R/help/05/02/12204.html was in reply to accessing a list). Suppose I have similarly called functions, except for a postfix. E.g. f.1 <-

Hi All, This past Wine conference, while great fun as always, was not as well attended as Wine conferences in the past. So I would like to stir up trouble by suggesting we rethink WineConf. For those that have not attended, the Wine conference has been a mostly annual affair since 2002. It is open to all, but is advertised as being aimed at Wine developers. About 35 people attend each year.

I'm looking for an open source router solution, and someone from the list recently recommended zebra (www.zebra.org). I haven't yet identified all my needs, but I'm guessing that it will do all my routing needs for a, say, class C set of IP addresses, particularly if I ever have to do anything BGP-related. Anyone have any pointers before I delve in? Or possibly a recommendation for

On 2017?03?23? 13:34, Jason Wang wrote: > > >> >>> +{ >>> + if (rvq->rh != rvq->rt) >>> + goto out; >>> + >>> + rvq->rh = rvq->rt = 0; >>> + rvq->rt = skb_array_consume_batched_bh(rvq->rx_array, rvq->rxq, >>> + VHOST_RX_BATCH); >> A comment explaining why is

On 2020/6/2 ??3:08, Jason Wang wrote: >> >>> +static const struct pci_device_id vp_vdpa_id_table[] = { >>> +??? { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_REDHAT_QUMRANET, PCI_ANY_ID) }, >>> +??? { 0 } >>> +}; >> This looks like it'll create a mess with either virtio pci >> or vdpa being loaded at random. Maybe just don't specify >> any IDs for

On 2017?03?23? 13:34, Jason Wang wrote: > > >> >>> +{ >>> + if (rvq->rh != rvq->rt) >>> + goto out; >>> + >>> + rvq->rh = rvq->rt = 0; >>> + rvq->rt = skb_array_consume_batched_bh(rvq->rx_array, rvq->rxq, >>> + VHOST_RX_BATCH); >> A comment explaining why is

On 2020/6/2 ??3:08, Jason Wang wrote: >> >>> +static const struct pci_device_id vp_vdpa_id_table[] = { >>> +??? { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_REDHAT_QUMRANET, PCI_ANY_ID) }, >>> +??? { 0 } >>> +}; >> This looks like it'll create a mess with either virtio pci >> or vdpa being loaded at random. Maybe just don't specify >> any IDs for

Hello, can CentOS 6.8 be run on a mini-PC like this? https://www.zotac.com/product/mini_pcs/zbox-ci323-nano would like to configure this as a Firewall, and this should be instead of my router (integratet firewall, NAT) and wlan-ap Thanks, Walter

On 2020/6/7 ??9:51, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 04:54:17PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >> On 2020/6/2 ??3:08, Jason Wang wrote: >>>>> +static const struct pci_device_id vp_vdpa_id_table[] = { >>>>> +??? { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_REDHAT_QUMRANET, PCI_ANY_ID) }, >>>>> +??? { 0 } >>>>> +}; >>>> This

On 2020/6/7 ??9:51, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 04:54:17PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >> On 2020/6/2 ??3:08, Jason Wang wrote: >>>>> +static const struct pci_device_id vp_vdpa_id_table[] = { >>>>> +??? { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_REDHAT_QUMRANET, PCI_ANY_ID) }, >>>>> +??? { 0 } >>>>> +}; >>>> This

Hi llvm list ! Everything is in the question. I've read this discussion on the mailinglist * [LLVMdev] LLVM IR is a compiler IR<https://groups.google.com/d/topic/llvm-dev/N3r_a1Vbrog/discussion> . * But since llvm3 and type system rewrite, is it a good idea to rethink about a VM wich could run the IR bytecode directly? llvm has differents bytecode from low level, to more hight level...

I am working on wxFileType and wxMimeTypesManager, most of which I have done but I had to comment out a nested class in wxFileType and the methods that use it. Does anyone have a clever way to get around nested classes since SWIG does not currently support them? Sean

To whom it may concern, 1. I would like to know if there is a command in R to choose a function for a given dataset. I am facing a difficult question about how to fit the data [ please attachment ] 2. Are there any function that will allow users to do the piecewise regression? If not, is it going to be provide in the new updated version? What I am using is the piecewise logistic regression,

> On Jun 17, 2014, at 2:10 PM, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> wrote: > >>> 2. Metadata compatibility. We already had precedence of introducing >>> incompatible changes into metadata format in the past within release. >>> Should we use relaxes rules for metadata compatibility? >> >> I think we have a special case for debug metadata (and

So, I have a test domain set up with rfc2307 = yes . Now I'm trying to figure out if a) my nfs automount data came over from OpenLDAP, and b) if not, how to get it into samba 4's ldap, or something else??? Do I need to rethink my approach? Mount locations are pretty consistent based on primary group/userid Needs to work on Linux. Existing entries look like this... # /u,

On Jul 9, 2014, at 3:51 PM, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 3:12 PM, Evan Cheng <evan.cheng at apple.com> wrote: >> >>> On Jun 17, 2014, at 2:10 PM, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>>> 2. Metadata compatibility. We already had precedence of introducing >>>>>

Hello, Is there any way of removing this line from showing on the console? I have a script that logs in every few seconds to manager and it makes the CLI output very hard to follow because of the " == Parsing '/etc/asterisk/manager.conf': Found". (Yes, Found! manager.conf was there 3 seconds ago, guess what it's still there.) There is a very old feature request about this

On 2020/6/8 ??2:32, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Mon, Jun 08, 2020 at 11:32:31AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >> On 2020/6/7 ??9:51, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >>> On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 04:54:17PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >>>> On 2020/6/2 ??3:08, Jason Wang wrote: >>>>>>> +static const struct pci_device_id vp_vdpa_id_table[] = {