Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "reteam".
2013 Aug 28
2
[LLVMdev] Adding diversity for security (and testing)
...Are there other classes of attackers you have in mind?
Of course, AES is _really_ fast [4] and in general, for a security application, I can't think of a good reason not to use a CSPRNG when random numbers are warranted.
1. http://users.ece.cmu.edu/~ejschwar/papers/usenix11.pdf
2. http://www.reteam.org/papers/e59.pdf
3. http://www.isg.rhul.ac.uk/tls/TLStiming.pdf
4. http://cr.yp.to/aes-speed/aesspeed-20080926.pdf
--
Stephen Checkoway
2013 Aug 28
0
[LLVMdev] Adding diversity for security (and testing)
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 9:14 PM, Todd Jackson <quantum.skyline at gmail.com>wrote:
>
> > We would also include a secure random number generator which links
>> > against OpenSSL. This would of course be an optional module disabled
>> > by default, but is necessary so the randomization is cryptographically
>> > secure and useful in security applications.
2013 Aug 27
4
[LLVMdev] Adding diversity for security (and testing)
> > We would also include a secure random number generator which links
> > against OpenSSL. This would of course be an optional module disabled
> > by default, but is necessary so the randomization is cryptographically
> > secure and useful in security applications.
>
> I am not sure why you need this feature. You can provide LLVM with a
> SEED value that can be