search for: ret_true

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "ret_true".

Did you mean: ret_tree
2006 Mar 16
2
[LLVMdev] Stupid '-load-vn -licm' question (LLVM 1.6)
...yte* %end, int -1 ; <ubyte*> [#uses=1] br label %loop_test regex6: ; preds = %loop_test %c8 = load ubyte* %iter ; <ubyte> [#uses=1] %matches9 = seteq ubyte %c8, 97 ; <bool> [#uses=1] br bool %matches9, label %ret_true, label %regex2 regex2: ; preds = %regex6 %c = load ubyte* %iter ; <ubyte> [#uses=1] %matches = seteq ubyte %c, 98 ; <bool> [#uses=1] br bool %matches, label %ret_true, label %loop_step loop_step: ; preds = %regex2...
2006 Mar 17
3
[LLVMdev] Stupid '-load-vn -licm' question (LLVM 1.6)
...are actually reduced to a switch statement using '-anders-aa -load-vn -gcse -simplifycfg -instcombine': regex6: ; preds = %loop_test %c8 = load ubyte* %iter ; <ubyte> [#uses=1] switch ubyte %c8, label %loop_step [ ubyte 97, label %ret_true ubyte 98, label %ret_true ] Unfortunately, this generates really weird code on the LLVM 1.6 PowerPC backend: LBB_matches_1: ; regex6 lbz r4, 0(r3) LBB_matches_2: ; NodeBlock rlwinm r5, r4, 0, 24, 31 cmplwi cr0, r5, 98 blt cr0, LBB...
2006 Mar 17
0
[LLVMdev] Stupid '-load-vn -licm' question (LLVM 1.6)
...; <ubyte*> > [#uses=1] > br label %loop_test > > regex6: ; preds = %loop_test > %c8 = load ubyte* %iter ; <ubyte> [#uses=1] > %matches9 = seteq ubyte %c8, 97 ; <bool> [#uses=1] > br bool %matches9, label %ret_true, label %regex2 > > regex2: ; preds = %regex6 > %c = load ubyte* %iter ; <ubyte> [#uses=1] > %matches = seteq ubyte %c, 98 ; <bool> [#uses=1] > br bool %matches, label %ret_true, label %loop_step > > loop_step:...
2006 Mar 17
0
[LLVMdev] Stupid '-load-vn -licm' question (LLVM 1.6)
...0(r3) > LBB_matches_2: ; NodeBlock > rlwinm r5, r4, 0, 24, 31 > cmplwi cr0, r5, 98 > blt cr0, LBB_matches_4 ; LeafBlock > LBB_matches_3: ; LeafBlock1 > rlwinm r4, r4, 0, 24, 31 > cmpwi cr0, r4, 98 > beq cr0, LBB_matches_8 ; ret_true > b LBB_matches_5 ; NewDefault > LBB_matches_4: ; LeafBlock > rlwinm r4, r4, 0, 24, 31 > cmpwi cr0, r4, 97 > beq cr0, LBB_matches_8 ; ret_true > LBB_matches_5: ; NewDefault > LBB_matches_6: ; loop_step > > I'm particularly confused...