Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "ret_print".
Did you mean:
get_print
2020 Sep 06
0
[libnbd PATCH 1/3] generator: Introduce REnum/RFlags return types
...-> pr "\"%%d\", ret"
+ | RBool | RErr | RFd | RInt | REnum (_) -> pr "\"%%d\", ret"
| RInt64 | RCookie -> pr "\"%%\" PRIi64 \"\", ret"
| RStaticString | RString ->
pr "\"%%s\", ret_printable ? ret_printable : \"\""
- | RUInt -> pr "\"%%u\", ret"
+ | RUInt | RFlags (_) -> pr "\"%%u\", ret"
);
pr ");\n";
(match ret with
| RStaticString | RString -> pr " free (ret_printable...
2020 Sep 06
8
[libnbd PATCH 0/3] Improve type-safety of ocaml/golang getters
Natural fallout after my recent testsuite additions that fixed a
couple of ocaml bugs in the setters. However, on at least the OCaml
code, I'm not sure what we should do if a newer libnbd ever returns a
bit that an older NBD.mli was not expecting at the time the OCaml
compiler ran (see below). I'm also not sure if there is a more
efficient way to avoid outputting Val_FOO() converters for