search for: resusable

Hi All, I havent heard a response back to my previous posts so I am now trying from a "broader" topic. What I have is the following: A 2 Form Factor Token Authentication system similar to RSA SecureID A Linux SAMBA 3.0.14a-Debian I've got the two systems authenticating against each other with RADIUS via PAM support. When I tell SAMBA to use this PAM support as well, I see the

Hello, when looking at "Writing R Extensions" with mem-allocation in mind, I wondered, which functions to use to substitute malloc(), calloc(), realloc() and strdup() and free(). It looked like Calloc() or R_Calloc() might be useful for some of my tasks, but when trying to use R_Calloc() for example, I got some error messages which I don't see where they are coming from. Maybe I

...n''t store that in session (it throws TypeError) so the next best thing (on the suggestion by Ola from this mailing list) I am storing it in Class variable or I can store this rpc_driver object in global variable. In brief my concerns are related to race conditions that may arise if I store resusable objects in class/global variables. I know it is very difficult to simulate and identify a race condition. But this is what I think may happen if I use class variable or even global variable to store SOAP::RPC::Driver object. In production each controller is loaded only once which I assume means t...

------------- Begin Forwarded Message ------------- Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 09:09:14 -0500 (CDT) From: Terry Therneau <therneau at mayo.edu> Subject: RE: Problem with coxme To: jhz22 at medschl.cam.ac.uk Cc: R-help at stat.mat.ethz.ch, liulei at virginia.edu, spencer.graves at pdf.com Content-MD5: BXKVsHtW/1I9mIUqrXBU0g== The original question involved a strange error message from coxme

Hi (Roger), I saw the announcement of filehash v2.0 and the sentence "This development has lead to better file locking for concurrent access and faster reading and writing of data in general" caught my attention. What kind of file locking do you refer to here? I am looking for a mechanism that can be used to lock files for reading and/or writing, and I'd love to have a cross

...If you've got any comments on the code, or anything local to the patch I'd be grateful if you could leave a comment on the relevant review. If there is anything more general then responding to this message may be better. The majority of the actual work is writing the tests, which should be resusable however the implementation ends up. The following patches are the glue code needed for range extension thunks to be implemented. [LLD][ELF] Make createThunks a class [NFC] https://reviews.llvm.org/D31654 [LLD][ELF] Fix Thunks with placement restrictions and linker scripts https://reviews.llvm.org/...

A new intel-gpu-tools quarterly release is available with the following changes: - New frequency manipulation tool (intel_gpu_frequency) - Adjustments for the Solaris port (Alan Coopersmith). - Remove tests/NAMING-CONVENTION since it's all in the docbook now, to avoid divergent conventions. - New CRITICAL log level for really serious stuff (Thomas Wood). - Interactive test mode can now

This is release 0.9.40 of Wine, a free implementation of Windows on Unix. What's new in this release: - Many MSHTML improvements. - A few more sound fixes. - Many Direct3D fixes. - Lots of bug fixes. Because of lags created by using mirrors, this message may reach you before the release is available at the public sites. The sources will be available from the following locations:

On 7/1/20 12:40 AM, Michael Kruse via llvm-dev wrote: > To illustrate some difficulties with FileCheck, lets make a > non-semantic change in LLVM: > >     --- a/llvm/lib/Analysis/VectorUtils.cpp >     +++ b/llvm/lib/Analysis/VectorUtils.cpp >     @@ -642,8 +642,8 @@ MDNode *llvm::uniteAccessGroups(MDNode > *AccGroups1, MDNode *AccGroups2) { >          return AccGroups1;

Hi, All Intel QA conducted a full validation for xen 4.1 rc1, it includes VT-x, VT-d, SRIOV, RAS, TXT and xl tools testing. 24 issues were exposed. Refer the bug list, please. We already assigned 14 bugs to Intel developers (which has an ''Intel'' tag in the bug title), most of the rest 10 bugs are related xl command. For the these bugs, need community''s help to fix

Hi all, Link protection is a new feature we are planning to introduce to Solaris and we would like to solicit your feedback on it. Please see attached document for details.