search for: resurse

It appears that in version 0.23 of puppet that how I am trying to create directories is nor working. If I have a snippet like this: # Set up the images file {"$git_web_image_location": ensure => directory, recurse => true } which becomes: file {"/var/www/html/images/git": ensure => directory,

On 7/16/13 5:23 AM, Evan Cheng wrote: > Thanks for the proposal. This is important work which is one step towards making LTO more applicable for large applications. Some comments inline. > > On Jul 12, 2013, at 3:49 PM, Shuxin Yang <shuxin.llvm at gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> 3.1.1 Figure out Partition scheme >> ---------------------------------- >> we

On Jul 16, 2013, at 10:37 AM, Shuxin Yang <shuxin.llvm at gmail.com> wrote: > > On 7/16/13 5:23 AM, Evan Cheng wrote: >> Thanks for the proposal. This is important work which is one step towards making LTO more applicable for large applications. Some comments inline. >> >> On Jul 12, 2013, at 3:49 PM, Shuxin Yang <shuxin.llvm at gmail.com> wrote: >>

Hi, Hopefully this isn't duplicating info. If so, sorry for the noise. I tried searching through old posts to this list about this issue, but couldn't find anything that worked. Below is a script I have put together that lets you rsync from a Windows 2003 shadow copy without having to copy files out of it first. You can link the shadow copy to either a drive letter or to a folder. You

I noticed today, that rsync does not appear to set the permissions on a directory until all of the contents are in place. this only really becomes noticeable and/or problematic when rsync'ing a large directory tree as root to a new, empty, location. For example, if you have the following tree: /foo /bar /file1 /file2 /baz /file3 /file4 When rsyncing this tree to another

Thanks for the proposal. This is important work which is one step towards making LTO more applicable for large applications. Some comments inline. On Jul 12, 2013, at 3:49 PM, Shuxin Yang <shuxin.llvm at gmail.com> wrote: > > > 3.1.1 Figure out Partition scheme > ---------------------------------- > we randomly pick up some function and put them in a partition. > It

In another thread recursive snapshot creation was found atomic so that it is done quickly, and more important, all at once or nothing at all. Do you know if recursive destroying and renaming of snapshots are atomic too? Regards Henrik Heino

B.t.w. I've created a PR for it that resolves it (see https://github.com/NLnetLabs/nsd/pull/346 ), but we may need to discuss if and how to resolve it first. First I'd like to know if your configuration is similar in that the CNAME or DNAME target does contain an allow-query list. Op 03-07-2024 om 10:52 schreef Willem Toorop via nsd-users: > Hi Jamie, > > I can reproduce,

I''ve spent the past while researching this but I''m just not finding a solution. I''ve been trying to get my xen kernel booting on a pretty much stock CentOS 4.4 installation. I installed Xen from src rpm and installed all the requisite software and I''m sure it''s with the ram disk but I can''t figure out how to resolve this. With a stock kernel

Hi, There: This is the proposal for parallelizing post-ipo stage. See the following for details. I also attach a toy-grade rudimentary implementation. This implementation can be used to illustrate some concepts here. This patch is not going to be committed. Unfortunately, this weekend I will be too busy to read emails. Please do not construe delayed response as being rude :-).

On 12 July 2013 15:49, Shuxin Yang <shuxin.llvm at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, There: > > This is the proposal for parallelizing post-ipo stage. See the following > for details. > > I also attach a toy-grade rudimentary implementation. This > implementation can be > used to illustrate some concepts here. This patch is not going to be > committed. > >