Displaying 20 results from an estimated 89 matches for "resurfaces".
Did you mean:
resurfaced
2016 Oct 14
0
Bug 6870 resurfaced in Samba 4.2.10
Hai,
Did you check if ifconfig still shows ipv6 adresses. ( even ::1 )
Can you check that.
I have several with ipv6 on and severel only ipv4.
As of 4.1.17+ i didnt see this happing here. Now on 4.4.5
I think you have forgotten something.
Greetz,
Louis
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Rebecca Gellman
> via samba
2018 Jan 08
0
CentOS 7.4 fails to boot as Xen PV guest: resurfaces (now also) with centosplus kernel 693.11.6.el7
On Sun, Jan 7, 2018 at 12:07 PM, David Groep <davidg at nikhef.nl> wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Maybe I'm the only one - so before filing it as a bug: it appears that
> the latest set of kernel patches in 3.10.0-693.11.6.el7 makes issue
> 0013763 "CentOS 7.4 kernel (3.10.0-693*) fails to boot as Xen PV guest"
> re-surface *also* with the CentOS PLUS kernel. But
2016 Oct 17
0
Bug 6870 resurfaced in Samba 4.2.10
On 2016-10-17 18:13, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 09:41:10AM -0700, Jeremy Allison via samba wrote: On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 05:13:08PM +0100, Rebecca Gellman via samba wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> So I did some digging into the source code, and I think I've found the
> issue. Around line 120 of source3/libads/cldap.c:
>
> for (i=0; i<num_servers;
2016 Oct 18
1
Bug 6870 resurfaced in Samba 4.2.10
On 2016-10-17 19:37, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 11:27:12AM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
>
>> No, it's not so bad. libcli/cldap/cldap.c is clearly supposed to cope
>> with caller.cldap == NULL - you can see this in the function
>> cldap_search_state_destructor() which checks:
>>
>> if (s->caller.cldap)
>>
>> before
2003 Mar 19
2
Old bug resurfacing?
I found this in the archives:
http://samba.cadcamlab.org/lists/samba/Feb2002/00318.html
It pertains pretty directly to the problem I'm seeing.
I first started having it with my 2.7 installed version
so I upgraded to 2.8. I'm still having the same problem.
Basically, I have a group of web developers that use
the linux/samba server for editing files for the site.
All the files are
2008 Jul 17
2
gecko-libs dependency resurfaces
In doing an update of centos 5.2 this morning, I observed that the old
gecko-libs dependency issue caused yum update to fail because it was
required by nspluginwrapper (x64_86), devhelp, yelm and firefox. Also, a
firefox (x64_86) showed the red hat splash screen rather than centos.
Manual installation of affected rpms using --nodeps (I don't advise this) did
not apear to impair the
2016 Oct 17
2
Bug 6870 resurfaced in Samba 4.2.10
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 07:13:46PM +0100, Rebecca Gellman via samba wrote:
>
>
> On 2016-10-17 18:13, Jeremy Allison wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 09:41:10AM -0700, Jeremy Allison via samba wrote: On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 05:13:08PM +0100, Rebecca Gellman via samba wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > So I did some digging into the source code, and I
2016 Oct 17
0
Bug 6870 resurfaced in Samba 4.2.10
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 05:13:08PM +0100, Rebecca Gellman via samba wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> So I did some digging into the source code, and I think I've found the
> issue. Around line 120 of source3/libads/cldap.c:
>
> for (i=0; i<num_servers; i++) {
> NTSTATUS status;
>
> status = cldap_socket_init(state->cldap,
> NULL, /* local_addr */
2016 Oct 17
2
Bug 6870 resurfaced in Samba 4.2.10
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 09:41:10AM -0700, Jeremy Allison via samba wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 05:13:08PM +0100, Rebecca Gellman via samba wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > So I did some digging into the source code, and I think I've found the
> > issue. Around line 120 of source3/libads/cldap.c:
> >
> > for (i=0; i<num_servers;
2007 Nov 29
4
Rollbacks, Sqlite3 bug. Has this been reintroduced ?
Hey,
I just updated from the edge and it looks like this _issue_ has resurfaced.
Yesterday things were working (stories and specs).
No code base changes, only rspec and rspec_on_rails
After updating today I now need to set <config.txn...fixtures> to false in
the spec_helper.rb
to get the specs running, the stories are fine. Looks like the fixture
loading is trying to start a txn.
I
2016 Oct 13
3
Bug 6870 resurfaced in Samba 4.2.10
According to this bugzilla entry, bug 6870 has been fixed as of at least
version 3.5:
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6870
However, I assert that it is present in 4.2.10, which ships with Debian
Jessie.
On my home network (IPv4 and IPv6), a box with Samba 4.2.10 with IPv6
disabled (via sysctl), will fail to contact a DC because the IPv6
connect fails immediately before the v4
2016 Oct 17
2
Bug 6870 resurfaced in Samba 4.2.10
Hi,
So I did some digging into the source code, and I think I've found the
issue. Around line 120 of source3/libads/cldap.c:
for (i=0; i<num_servers; i++) {
NTSTATUS status;
status = cldap_socket_init(state->cldap,
NULL, /* local_addr */
state->servers[i],
&state->cldap[i]);
if (tevent_req_nterror(req, status)) {
return tevent_req_post(req, ev);
2018 Jan 07
2
CentOS 7.4 fails to boot as Xen PV guest: resurfaces (now also) with centosplus kernel 693.11.6.el7
Dear all,
Maybe I'm the only one - so before filing it as a bug: it appears that
the latest set of kernel patches in 3.10.0-693.11.6.el7 makes issue
0013763 "CentOS 7.4 kernel (3.10.0-693*) fails to boot as Xen PV guest"
re-surface *also* with the CentOS PLUS kernel. But maybe in a
different way ...
Thanks to the (great!) quick work on making the plus kernel available
(in #14330,
2019 Jan 22
2
[PATCH] lib: Reset errno to zero to avoid erroneously returning E2BIG
This line was accidentally removed in 77fe74fc, causing
bug #1145056 (Bugzilla) to resurface.
---
lib/utf16.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/lib/utf16.c b/lib/utf16.c
index e099548..67fa996 100644
--- a/lib/utf16.c
+++ b/lib/utf16.c
@@ -58,6 +58,7 @@ _hivex_recode (hive_h *h, recode_type t,
/* Reset errno here because we don't want to accidentally
* return
2006 Mar 06
2
Problems with heatmap.2 in the gregmisc package
Hi
Sorry to revisit an old problem, I seemed to solve this in 2004, only
for it to resurface :-S
I am trying to plot a heatmap, and I don't want the columns of my matrix
re-ordered. The function doesn't seem to behave as the help would have
you believe:
a <- matrix(rnorm(100),nr=20)
a.d <- dist(a)
a.hc <- hclust(a.d)
a.de <- as.dendrogram(a.hc)
# columns are re-ordered
2015 Feb 16
2
[LLVMdev] (no subject)
This is my first post so not sure I've done everything right.
Just started playing with LLVM on Windows 7, VS C++.
Was trying to play with the example 4 and got the following error:
"LLVM ERROR: Incompatible object format" I was able resolve the problem by following the suggestion found here:http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2013-December/068395.html This issue seems to
2019 May 23
2
system unresponsive
On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 10:02 AM mark <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote:
> That seems unlikely. Foe one, I've seen that... but I *always* see entries
> in the log about the oom-killer being invoked. For another, this isn't a
> compute node, it's *only* a fileserver, serving projects, home
> directories, and backups (home-grown b/u, uses rsync), and backups don't
>
2005 May 02
1
Re: Long Shorewall Startup Times Revisited
Gregory Pleau wrote:
>>
>> The problem that you had with LDAP causing long Shorewall startup has
>> resurfaced. In your mail to me, you mentioned that you had found that
>> the issue was a permissions problem but gave no details.
>>
>> Would you be so kind as to give me the details so I can pass them on to
>> the current sufferer? I notice that you are
2006 Apr 12
2
RedCloth versus BlueCloth efficiency
Has anyone profiled the performance of RedCloth versus BlueCloth?
I''m starting to realise that RedCloth is a more mature ruby project,
although Markdown the syntax maybe more widespread than Textilize.
Apart from the syntax, does anyone feel they have a preference, in terms
of performance or number of outstanding bugs?
Many thanks in advance.
CHEERS> SAM
2018 Mar 26
2
R Lapack – why a subset?
Hi,
Why doesn't R include a full Lapack but only a subset?
My cda package (now archived) relying on RcppArmadillo has broken multiple
times on CRAN over the past few years following updates in the underlying
Armadillo library, Every time it follows the same pattern: Armadillo adds a
function to solve a specialised linear system more efficiently, and the
corresponding Lapack routine is not