Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "resure".
Did you mean:
resume
2012 Apr 25
1
3.2.7 vs 3.5 locking logic/mechanism - locking denied to non-owners
hi everybody
I'm hoping some experts could shed a bit more light on the
subject
I cannot work it out and it's potentially quite a hassle
win xp sp3 client
samba 3.2.7 on sles 11
samba 3.5.10 on rhel 6.1
and one app the the front end to a user, that does not write
anything back to the resure
this is what I think goes on:
3.5 somehow denies some sort of locking to the client if the
user does not own/write to data tree
no such problem with 3.2
I've compared runtime configs of both sambas and virtually
the look almost identical, well, where the differences are
they look unrelated...