Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "resummarize".
2012 Oct 05
4
[LLVMdev] TSVC/Equivalencing-dbl
...at gmail.com>
> To: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov>
> Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu
> Sent: Friday, October 5, 2012 12:10:03 PM
> Subject: Re: TSVC/Equivalencing-dbl
>
> Oops, I ran the testsuite wrong: read clang output for dragonegg
> output.
Okay, can you resummarize? Do you mean that?
gcc -O0:
S1421 0.00 16000
gcc -O0 under valgrind:
S1421 0.00 17208.404325315
clang:
S1421 0.00 17208.404325315
This is all on Darwin, right?
I would certainly tend to suspect an 80-bit-intermediate issue, but, both...
2012 Oct 05
0
[LLVMdev] TSVC/Equivalencing-dbl
...Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov>
>> Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu
>> Sent: Friday, October 5, 2012 12:10:03 PM
>> Subject: Re: TSVC/Equivalencing-dbl
>>
>> Oops, I ran the testsuite wrong: read clang output for dragonegg
>> output.
>
> Okay, can you resummarize? Do you mean that?
>
> gcc -O0:
> S1421 0.00 16000
>
> gcc -O0 under valgrind:
> S1421 0.00 17208.404325315
>
> clang:
> S1421 0.00 17208.404325315
exactly. For "clang" this is only when building lik...
2012 Oct 05
2
[LLVMdev] TSVC/Equivalencing-dbl
...gt;
> >> Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu
> >> Sent: Friday, October 5, 2012 12:10:03 PM
> >> Subject: Re: TSVC/Equivalencing-dbl
> >>
> >> Oops, I ran the testsuite wrong: read clang output for dragonegg
> >> output.
> >
> > Okay, can you resummarize? Do you mean that?
> >
> > gcc -O0:
> > S1421 0.00 16000
> >
> > gcc -O0 under valgrind:
> > S1421 0.00 17208.404325315
> >
> > clang:
> > S1421 0.00 17208.404325315
>
> exactly...
2012 Oct 07
0
[LLVMdev] TSVC/Equivalencing-dbl
...gt;
> >> Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu
> >> Sent: Friday, October 5, 2012 12:10:03 PM
> >> Subject: Re: TSVC/Equivalencing-dbl
> >>
> >> Oops, I ran the testsuite wrong: read clang output for dragonegg
> >> output.
> >
> > Okay, can you resummarize? Do you mean that?
> >
> > gcc -O0:
> > S1421 0.00 16000
> >
> > gcc -O0 under valgrind:
> > S1421 0.00 17208.404325315
> >
> > clang:
> > S1421 0.00 17208.404325315
>
> exactly...
2012 Oct 05
2
[LLVMdev] TSVC/Equivalencing-dbl
Hi Hal, I was looking into why this fails with dragonegg, and noticed the
following: if I compile with GCC (-O0) then I get as output:
Running each loop 3125 times...
Loop Time(Sec) Checksum
S421 0.00 32010.620068485
S1421 0.00 16000
S422 0.00 3.7377231414078
S423 0.00 32000.736895702
S424 0.00 32822.36069424
This is the same as the reference output. If I run exactly the
2012 Oct 05
0
[LLVMdev] TSVC/Equivalencing-dbl
Oops, I ran the testsuite wrong: read clang output for dragonegg output.
2007 Jun 23
4
Zaptel Compilation
Hi List;
I am facing a problem relaed to menuselect when I am
trying to compile zaptel -1.4.2.1, the error as
following:
[root at localhost zaptel-1.4.2.1]# make linux26
make[1]: Entering directory
`/usr/src/asterisk-1.4.4/zaptel-1.4.2.1/menuselect'
make[2]: Entering directory
`/usr/src/asterisk-1.4.4/zaptel-1.4.2.1/menuselect'
make[3]: Entering directory