search for: resultti

On Jan 16, 2010, at 11:15 AM, Talin wrote: > OK here's the patch for real this time :) > > On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 4:36 PM, Talin <viridia at gmail.com> wrote: > Here's a work in progress of the union patch. Note that the test > "union.ll" does not work, so you probably don't want to check this > in as is. However, I'd be interested in any

>>> >>> >>> The reason for the difference is that e.g "long" in >>> >>>> bool GOMP_loop_runtime_next(long, long) >>> >>> has a different size on different architectures. >>> >>> Currently we generate the prototypes and functions ourselves: >>>> declare i8 @GOMP_loop_runtime_next(i64*,

On 12/22/2010 03:12 PM, Peter Collingbourne wrote: > On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 01:38:06PM -0500, Tobias Grosser wrote: >> Hi, >> >> raghesh and I are working in Polly on automatically generating OpenMP >> calls. This works nicely on a 64bit architecture, >> however the functions we need to generate are slightly different on >> different platforms. >>

OK here's a new version of the patch - and the unions.ll test actually passes :) On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > > On Jan 16, 2010, at 11:15 AM, Talin wrote: > > OK here's the patch for real this time :) >> >> On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 4:36 PM, Talin <viridia at gmail.com> wrote: >> Here's a work

I am working on adding support for C++ exception handling when compiling for a native Windows target (that is a target with "MSVC" specified as the environment). Because of differences between how the native Windows runtime handles exceptions and the Itanium-based model used by current LLVM exception handling code, I believe this will require some extensions to the LLVM IR, though

I've made all the suggested changes - however, I'm having a bit of problem running the tests. I started "make check" and several hours later it had only made it through about 1/3 of the tests. I'm not sure what the deal is. On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > > On Jan 16, 2010, at 11:15 AM, Talin wrote: > > OK

I still think there is a bug somewhere, but not sure where yet. This is what is generated in intrinsic.gen: case Intrinsic::opencl_math_fdistance: // llvm.opencl.math.fdistance ResultTy = Type::FloatTy; ArgTys.push_back(Tys[0]); ArgTys.push_back(Tys[0]); break; This is the intrinsic definition: def int_opencl_math_fdistance_fast : Intrinsic<[llvm_float_ty],

On 12/26/2010 01:31 AM, Eric Christopher wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> The reason for the difference is that e.g "long" in >>>> >>>>> bool GOMP_loop_runtime_next(long, long) >>>> >>>> has a different size on different architectures. >>>> >>>> Currently we generate the prototypes and

On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 11:15 AM, Villmow, Micah <Micah.Villmow at amd.com> wrote: > I still think there is a bug somewhere, but not sure where yet. > This is what is generated in intrinsic.gen: > case Intrinsic::opencl_math_fdistance:          // > llvm.opencl.math.fdistance >    ResultTy = Type::FloatTy; >    ArgTys.push_back(Tys[0]); >    ArgTys.push_back(Tys[0]);

Oops. That was premature. I think your original question was on the right track. TableGen distinguishes between known and "overloaded" types (like "llvm_anyfloat_ty" in your example). The overloaded types are numbered separately, and the argument to LLVMMatchType is an index into these overloaded types, ignoring the known types. So, in your case, the first

>>> Please add a generous block comment to >>> llvm/include/llvm/Bitcode/LLVMBitCodes.h above the new enum >>> explaining >>> what the difference is though. :) >> > > Should have said: > >> Should I take the same approach to the encoding of pointer types in >> the types table? PointerTypes are a bit easier. The code to write them

On Apr 15, 2009, at 11:15 AM, Villmow, Micah wrote: > I still think there is a bug somewhere, but not sure where yet. > This is what is generated in intrinsic.gen: > case Intrinsic::opencl_math_fdistance: // > llvm.opencl.math.fdistance > ResultTy = Type::FloatTy; > ArgTys.push_back(Tys[0]); > ArgTys.push_back(Tys[0]); > break; OK. That looks right to me.

OK here's the patch for real this time :) On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 4:36 PM, Talin <viridia at gmail.com> wrote: > Here's a work in progress of the union patch. Note that the test "union.ll" > does not work, so you probably don't want to check this in as is. However, > I'd be interested in any feedback you're willing to give. > > -- > -- Talin

Here's a work in progress of the union patch. Note that the test "union.ll" does not work, so you probably don't want to check this in as is. However, I'd be interested in any feedback you're willing to give. -- -- Talin -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi Jin-Gu Kang! It are possible that the problem you are experiencing have already been solved in the current llvm 2.6 release tree and the current svn trunk. So try using llc from llvm 2.6 release branch or llvm pre2.7 svn trunk! It would be helpful if you could open a bugreport for this issue and attach the problematic od.bc since we need a testcase from the bitcode that exposes the bug inorder

Hi Reid, Thanks for the input. You wrote: > The @_Z4testv.unwind.1 helper just calls ~Inner(), but not ~Outer. That’s actually intentional. The thing to keep in mind is that all of the landing pads are going to be effectively removed by the time the final object image is generated. They are just there to facilitate the table generation, and in the __CxxFrameHandler3 case they don’t mean

David Greene wrote: > The problem is that Intrinsic::getDeclaration takes four > parameters but is only passed two: > > Function *Intrinsic::getDeclaration(Module *M, ID id, const Type **Tys, > unsigned numTys) It turns out that this happens all over llvm-convert.c. Tys and numTys default to zero, which is why it builds. The problem is,

ping... On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 12:25 PM, Talin <viridia at gmail.com> wrote: > OK here's a new version of the patch - and the unions.ll test actually > passes :) > > On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > >> >> On Jan 16, 2010, at 11:15 AM, Talin wrote: >> >> OK here's the patch for real this

On Nov 24, 2007, at 7:47 PM, Christopher Lamb wrote: > > On Nov 21, 2007, at 6:22 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > >> On Wed, 21 Nov 2007, Christopher Lamb wrote: >>>> Unlike alignment and volatility, I think that the address space >>>> qualifier >>>> should be represented explicitly in the type system. The >>>> reason for this

If I force it to use v2f32 for my register class, it still fails with: d:\hq\main\sw\appeng\tools\hpc\opencl\compiler\llvm\test\AMDIL>TableGen. exe -gen -dag-isel -I../../include/ test.td > output GPRV2F32:v2f32:$src1 MACRO_DISTANCE_FAST_v2f32: (set GPRF32:f32:$dst, (i ntrinsic_w_chain:f32 84:iPTR, GPRV2F32:v2f32:$src0, GPRV2F32:v2f32:$src1)) TableGen.exe: In