Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "result_t".
Did you mean:
result_r
2012 Dec 17
0
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Teaching ScalarEvolution to handle IV=add(zext(trunc(IV)), Step)
...formance problem I am seeing for simple benchmark.
>
> Starting with this C code:
>
> 01: signed char foo(void)
> 02: {
> 03: const int count = 8000;
> 04: signed char result = 0;
> 05: int j;
> 06:
> 07: for (j = 0; j < count; ++j) {
> 08: result += (result_t)(3);
> 09: }
> 10:
> 11: return result;
> 12: }
FWIW, this code is probably not doing what it was intended to do; it's
result is implementation-defined or an implementation-defined signal is
raised (6.3.1.3).
>
> I end up with this IR feeding into Induction Variable Simpli...
2012 Dec 10
3
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Teaching ScalarEvolution to handle IV=add(zext(trunc(IV)), Step)
...n this patch for ScalarEvolution.
It addresses a performance problem I am seeing for simple benchmark.
Starting with this C code:
01: signed char foo(void)
02: {
03: const int count = 8000;
04: signed char result = 0;
05: int j;
06:
07: for (j = 0; j < count; ++j) {
08: result += (result_t)(3);
09: }
10:
11: return result;
12: }
I end up with this IR feeding into Induction Variable Simplification:
01: define signext i8 @foo() nounwind readnone {
02: entry:
03: br label %for.body
04:
05: for.body: ; preds = %entry,
%for.body
06: %j.04...
2012 Dec 18
2
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Teaching ScalarEvolution to handle IV=add(zext(trunc(IV)), Step)
...hmark.
>>
>> Starting with this C code:
>>
>> 01: signed char foo(void)
>> 02: {
>> 03: const int count = 8000;
>> 04: signed char result = 0;
>> 05: int j;
>> 06:
>> 07: for (j = 0; j < count; ++j) {
>> 08: result += (result_t)(3);
>> 09: }
>> 10:
>> 11: return result;
>> 12: }
> FWIW, this code is probably not doing what it was intended to do; it's
> result is implementation-defined or an implementation-defined signal is
> raised (6.3.1.3).
Yes. The code is somewhat contrived. It...
2004 Oct 04
1
Button property not in FXTableItem for 1.2 ??
I''m using a table in an application, and it worked in 1.0 - but in 1.2
this line:
@result_table.getItem(0,j).button=true
gives this error:
main.rb:91:in `display_result'': undefined method `setButton='' for
Id:Fox::FXTableItem (NoMethodError)
What am I doing wrong??
(Plus - it''s not in the RDoc anymore... where did it go?)
-Rich