Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "result0".
Did you mean:
result
2016 Sep 29
3
Load combine pass
> On 29 Sep 2016, at 21:01, Sanjoy Das <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Artur,
>
> Artur Pilipenko wrote:
>
> > BTW, do we really need to emit an atomic load if all the individual
> > components are bytes?
>
> Depends -- do you mean at the at the hardware level or at the IR
> level?
>
> If you mean at the IR level, then I
2013 Nov 04
0
[LLVMdev] conditional flow resulting in "Instruction does not dominate all uses!"
Well, what I had in mind was actually something like the following:
entry:
result0 = invoke func0 to defer_block unwind landing0
landing0:
landingpad
result1 = invoke func1 to defer_block unwind landing1
landing1:
landingpad
br defer_block
defer_block:
result = phi [ result0, entry ], [ result1, landing0 ], [ null, landing1 ]
...
This doesn't have landing pads...
2013 Nov 04
2
[LLVMdev] conditional flow resulting in "Instruction does not dominate all uses!"
On 4 November 2013 08:19, Henrique Santos
<henrique.nazare.santos at gmail.com> wrote:
> Well, what I had in mind was actually something like the following:
>
> entry:
> result0 = invoke func0 to defer_block unwind landing0
>
> landing0:
> landingpad
> result1 = invoke func1 to defer_block unwind landing1
>
> landing1:
> landingpad
> br defer_block
>
> defer_block:
> result = phi [ result0, entry ], [ result1, landing0 ], [ null,...
2013 Nov 04
2
[LLVMdev] conditional flow resulting in "Instruction does not dominate all uses!"
On 4 November 2013 02:31, Henrique Santos
<henrique.nazare.santos at gmail.com> wrote:
> But the incoming value from the landing pad will always be null, won't it?
> If so, just iterate through the predecessors and add the terminator as the
> incoming value if it's an invoke instruction and add the null value it's
> not.
> Won't that work?
>
Note that the
2013 Nov 04
0
[LLVMdev] conditional flow resulting in "Instruction does not dominate all uses!"
...013 at 2:25 PM, Rafael EspĂndola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com
> wrote:
> On 4 November 2013 08:19, Henrique Santos
> <henrique.nazare.santos at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Well, what I had in mind was actually something like the following:
> >
> > entry:
> > result0 = invoke func0 to defer_block unwind landing0
> >
> > landing0:
> > landingpad
> > result1 = invoke func1 to defer_block unwind landing1
> >
> > landing1:
> > landingpad
> > br defer_block
> >
> > defer_block:
> > result =...
2012 Sep 20
3
lattice dotplot reorder contiguous levels
my reproducible example
test<-structure(list(site = structure(c(1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 2L,
2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 3L,
3L, 3L, 3L, 3L, 3L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L,
4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 5L), .Label = c("A",
"B", "C", "D", "E"), class = "factor"),