search for: result0

Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "result0".

Did you mean: result
2016 Sep 29
3
Load combine pass
> On 29 Sep 2016, at 21:01, Sanjoy Das <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com> wrote: > > Hi Artur, > > Artur Pilipenko wrote: > > > BTW, do we really need to emit an atomic load if all the individual > > components are bytes? > > Depends -- do you mean at the at the hardware level or at the IR > level? > > If you mean at the IR level, then I
2013 Nov 04
0
[LLVMdev] conditional flow resulting in "Instruction does not dominate all uses!"
Well, what I had in mind was actually something like the following: entry: result0 = invoke func0 to defer_block unwind landing0 landing0: landingpad result1 = invoke func1 to defer_block unwind landing1 landing1: landingpad br defer_block defer_block: result = phi [ result0, entry ], [ result1, landing0 ], [ null, landing1 ] ... This doesn't have landing pads...
2013 Nov 04
2
[LLVMdev] conditional flow resulting in "Instruction does not dominate all uses!"
On 4 November 2013 08:19, Henrique Santos <henrique.nazare.santos at gmail.com> wrote: > Well, what I had in mind was actually something like the following: > > entry: > result0 = invoke func0 to defer_block unwind landing0 > > landing0: > landingpad > result1 = invoke func1 to defer_block unwind landing1 > > landing1: > landingpad > br defer_block > > defer_block: > result = phi [ result0, entry ], [ result1, landing0 ], [ null,...
2013 Nov 04
2
[LLVMdev] conditional flow resulting in "Instruction does not dominate all uses!"
On 4 November 2013 02:31, Henrique Santos <henrique.nazare.santos at gmail.com> wrote: > But the incoming value from the landing pad will always be null, won't it? > If so, just iterate through the predecessors and add the terminator as the > incoming value if it's an invoke instruction and add the null value it's > not. > Won't that work? > Note that the
2013 Nov 04
0
[LLVMdev] conditional flow resulting in "Instruction does not dominate all uses!"
...013 at 2:25 PM, Rafael EspĂ­ndola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com > wrote: > On 4 November 2013 08:19, Henrique Santos > <henrique.nazare.santos at gmail.com> wrote: > > Well, what I had in mind was actually something like the following: > > > > entry: > > result0 = invoke func0 to defer_block unwind landing0 > > > > landing0: > > landingpad > > result1 = invoke func1 to defer_block unwind landing1 > > > > landing1: > > landingpad > > br defer_block > > > > defer_block: > > result =...
2012 Sep 20
3
lattice dotplot reorder contiguous levels
my reproducible example test<-structure(list(site = structure(c(1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 3L, 3L, 3L, 3L, 3L, 3L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 5L), .Label = c("A", "B", "C", "D", "E"), class = "factor"),