search for: resubmission

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 34 matches for "resubmission".

2015 Feb 05
3
Resubmission after N days
...he move? >>> Then use any IMAP client library, use the LIST command to get the mailboxes, FETCH to get the messages and COPY/EXPUNGE >>> to move them. > >> You are right moving the mail should be simple. > >> I ask myself it is possible to store the date of the resubmission in the mail itself. > > How shall the date be visible to the user? > > Remember that altering the message may invalidate DKIM and other security / verification stuff. > > Instead of a simple "mv" you can prefix the message with "X-Date: " header, so you mark...
2015 Feb 05
2
Resubmission after N days
...at specific action shall be done via IMAP? The move? > Then use any IMAP client library, use the LIST command to get the mailboxes, FETCH to get the messages and COPY/EXPUNGE > to move them. You are right moving the mail should be simple. I ask myself it is possible to store the date of the resubmission in the mail itself. Thomas
2015 Feb 06
0
Resubmission after N days
...gt; Then use any IMAP client library, use the LIST command to get the mailboxes, FETCH to get the messages and COPY/EXPUNGE >>>> to move them. >> >>> You are right moving the mail should be simple. >> >>> I ask myself it is possible to store the date of the resubmission in the mail itself. >> >> How shall the date be visible to the user? >> >> Remember that altering the message may invalidate DKIM and other security / verification stuff. >> >> Instead of a simple "mv" you can prefix the message with "X-Date: &quot...
2015 Feb 04
3
Resubmission after N days
...t; >> I would like to implement a 43Folder system[1] with dovecot and a mail user agent. > >> Use case: > >> - I have a new mail in my inbox. I read it and see that I can't handle it now. I want to handle this mail in 5 days. >> - Now I want to have some sort of resubmission: the mail should be moved to a different location for these 5 days. >> - After 5 days the mail should be moved to my inbox again. > > What mail storage are you using? With Maildir all messages are plain files, you could move those messages into a specific folder and do: Yes, I use Mai...
2015 Feb 05
0
Resubmission after N days
...IMAP? The move? >> Then use any IMAP client library, use the LIST command to get the >> mailboxes, FETCH to get the messages and COPY/EXPUNGE >> to move them. > > You are right moving the mail should be simple. > > I ask myself it is possible to store the date of the resubmission in the mail > itself. How shall the date be visible to the user? Remember that altering the message may invalidate DKIM and other security / verification stuff. Instead of a simple "mv" you can prefix the message with "X-Date: " header, so you mark the message, but it i...
2015 Feb 04
8
Resubmission after N days
Hi, I would like to implement a 43Folder system[1] with dovecot and a mail user agent. Use case: - I have a new mail in my inbox. I read it and see that I can't handle it now. I want to handle this mail in 5 days. - Now I want to have some sort of resubmission: the mail should be moved to a different location for these 5 days. - After 5 days the mail should be moved to my inbox again. How can this be done with Dovecot/IMAP? I have programming experience, but I am new to Dovecot/IMAP. I would like solve this with Dovecot only (without a database or web...
2015 Feb 04
0
Resubmission after N days
...homas G?ttler wrote: > I would like to implement a 43Folder system[1] with dovecot and a mail user agent. > > Use case: > > - I have a new mail in my inbox. I read it and see that I can't handle it now. I want to handle this mail in 5 days. > - Now I want to have some sort of resubmission: the mail should be moved to a different location for these 5 days. > - After 5 days the mail should be moved to my inbox again. What mail storage are you using? With Maildir all messages are plain files, you could move those messages into a specific folder and do: find /path/to/folder -mtime...
2015 Feb 04
0
AW: Resubmission after N days
...Febr. 4, 2015 07:02 schrieb Thomas G?ttler : Hi, I would like to implement a 43Folder system[1] with dovecot and a mail user agent. Use case: - I have a new mail in my inbox. I read it and see that I can't handle it now. I want to handle this mail in 5 days. - Now I want to have some sort of resubmission: the mail should be moved to a different location for these 5 days. - After 5 days the mail should be moved to my inbox again. How can this be done with Dovecot/IMAP? I have programming experience, but I am new to Dovecot/IMAP. I would like solve this with Dovecot only (without a database or web...
2015 Feb 05
0
Resubmission after N days
...ld like to implement a 43Folder system[1] with dovecot and a mail user agent. >> >>> Use case: >> >>> - I have a new mail in my inbox. I read it and see that I can't handle it now. I want to handle this mail in 5 days. >>> - Now I want to have some sort of resubmission: the mail should be moved to a different location for these 5 days. >>> - After 5 days the mail should be moved to my inbox again. >> >> What mail storage are you using? With Maildir all messages are plain files, you could move those messages into a specific folder and do: >...
2004 Feb 04
0
RAID 0 Problems - resubmission as subsriber
Can some one help me with a ext3 file sys problem?? I have a raid 0 array that was not shut down properly due to bad contacts in a removable drive bay. It consists of two 80Gb drives. I can create /dev/md0 ok. but if fails during mount. When I run: fsck -n /dev/md0 it reports the following: fsck 1.32 e2fsck 1.32 SuperBlock has a bad ext3 journal (inode 8) clear? no fsck.ext2: illegal inode
2002 May 09
0
[PATCH] (Resubmission) 'Connection reset by peer' with rsync server on cygwin
Hello? Concerns were raised about the action of shutdown() on Unices - I replied with evidence suggesting that this would not be a problem. I have not heard anything since. If this has to be held over to 2.6.0, fair enough - but please tell me whether itjust needs time, or me to go and fix something??? Thanks Max. BEGIN PATCH diff -mru rsync-2.5.5/clientserver.c
2002 Jul 20
0
[PATCH] (Resubmission) Enable push to remote rsynced server using rsync:// URL
Hello, Recently I noticed a disparity in the use of HOST::MODULE and rsync://HOST/MODULE syntax by rsync. HOST::MODULE can be used to both pull from and push to a remote rsyncd server, but rsync://HOST/MODULE can only be used to pull from a remote rsyncd server. The attached patch resolves this issue by also allowing a rsync:// URL to be used to push files to a remote rsyncd server. Testing:
2012 Mar 25
3
attempt to access beyond end of device and livelock
Hi Dongyang, Yan, When testing BTRFS with RAID 0 metadata on linux-3.3, we see discard ranges exceeding the end of the block device [1], potentially causing dataloss; when this occurs, filesystem writeback becomes catatonic due to continual resubmission. The reproducer is quite simple [2]. Hope this proves useful... Thanks, Daniel --- [1] attempt to access beyond end of device ram0: rw=129, want=8452072, limit=4096000 ... --- [2] modprobe brd rd_size=2048000 (or boot with ramdisk_size=2048000) mkfs.btrfs -m raid0 /dev/ram0 /dev/ram1 mount...
2012 Jul 26
4
[PATCH 0/2] virtio-scsi fixes for 3.6
James, patch 1 fixes scanning of LUNs whose number is greater than 255. QEMU passes a max_lun of 16383 (because it uses SAM numbering) but in Linux it must become 32768 (because LUNs above 255 are "relocated" to 16640). Patch 2 is a resubmission of the patch for online resizing of virtio-scsi LUNs, which needs to be rebased. LUNs above 255 now work for all of scanning, hotplug, hotunplug and resize. Thanks, Paolo Paolo Bonzini (2): virtio-scsi: fix LUNs greater than 255 virtio-scsi: support online resizing of disks drivers/scsi/v...
2012 Jul 26
4
[PATCH 0/2] virtio-scsi fixes for 3.6
James, patch 1 fixes scanning of LUNs whose number is greater than 255. QEMU passes a max_lun of 16383 (because it uses SAM numbering) but in Linux it must become 32768 (because LUNs above 255 are "relocated" to 16640). Patch 2 is a resubmission of the patch for online resizing of virtio-scsi LUNs, which needs to be rebased. LUNs above 255 now work for all of scanning, hotplug, hotunplug and resize. Thanks, Paolo Paolo Bonzini (2): virtio-scsi: fix LUNs greater than 255 virtio-scsi: support online resizing of disks drivers/scsi/v...
2004 Aug 06
2
Some diffs to libshout for MacOSX
Resubmission of patches with curteous nods from the MusicKit Project... - SKoT ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stephen Brandon" <stephen@brandonitconsulting.co.uk> To: <icecast-dev@xiph.org> Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 1:26 PM Subject: [icecast-dev] Some diffs to libshout for M...
2012 Oct 22
1
[PATCH] memdisk: adjust order of DPT values in mstructs.h
This is a resubmission of my patch sent Jun 18, 2011 since it does not seem it was accepted. Please let me know if I am doing something wrong in how I am submitting this patch. Thank you. The below patch will swap order of sectors/track with bytes/sector to match diskette parameter table order (as pointed to by INT 1E...
2013 Mar 04
2
SAS and R complement each other
I'm not sure why you posted the original note. I quit using SAS in 1991 and haven't needed it yet. Frank RogerJDeAngelis wrote > Sorry about the double post. But I keep getting 'post' rejections, so I > resubmitted about an hour later. ----- Frank Harrell Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University -- View this message in context:
2015 Apr 07
1
Package compilation woes on submission.
...el and R-release in windows 7 local and ubuntu 12.04 local. The package has a C file in src folder which successfully compiled in all the cases (there were few trivial warnings). I had submitted the package last week and was asked to resubmit with few changes in the description file. However upon resubmission today, the C code failed to compile in the reviewer's system throwing several errors. I rechecked the package with windows 7 and ubuntu as before and there were no errors. I tried winbuilder with R-release as well as R 3.2.0 beta again without any errors. The only difference that I could unde...
2024 Mar 29
1
declare and validate options
> > I think there are too many packages that would need changes under this > scheme. There would be zero if the registration of options is not required for packages first uploaded on CRAN before the feature is implemented. If an option is not registered no validation is triggered and nothing breaks even if we opt in the behavior. > If those functions could be made simple enough and