search for: respsfrom

...boggling, so there might need some more tweaking, but > thanks to Garming it is has done the job for us since 4.3.0 for almost > one year. > > Cheers, > > Denis > > >> >> > Wasn't aware of this. Thank you for the info. If I was to delete the incorrect respsFrom/repsTo attributes, wouldn't the KCC just regenerate them over time once the KCC check and ISTG check kicked in? -- -James

On 9/28/2016 1:25 AM, garming at catalyst.net.nz wrote: >> >> Wasn't aware of this. Thank you for the info. If I was to delete the >> incorrect respsFrom/repsTo attributes, wouldn't the KCC just >> regenerate them over time once the KCC check and ISTG check kicked in? > > As long as the topology doesn't change or DCs which are not > bridgeheads do not go offline, there should be basically zero > additional reps over time....

> > Wasn't aware of this. Thank you for the info. If I was to delete the > incorrect respsFrom/repsTo attributes, wouldn't the KCC just > regenerate them over time once the KCC check and ISTG check kicked in? As long as the topology doesn't change or DCs which are not bridgeheads do not go offline, there should be basically zero additional reps over time. How often they build u...

On 9/22/2016 6:31 PM, Garming Sam wrote: > On 23/09/16 00:59, lingpanda101 at gmail.com wrote: >> For clarification I'll add a few things. >> >> I initially deleted all the NTDS site links for each site and allowed >> the new KCC to create them. However it did not create them I believe >> correctly. By that I mean it defined what appeared to be a bridgehead