search for: resposnsibility

Hi all, I need to know the SIP response code from within the dial plan, someone could point me on how to? Gabriel Ortiz -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20090506/2e62bfda/attachment.htm

Hello all, I''m writing to the list, because I have a problem setting up my routing that I''m unable to overcome. 1. The situation: +-------------+ +-------------+ | actaea | eth0 | ilex | | 192.168.1.4 |------ localnet ------| 192.168.1.1 | +-------------+ 192.168.1.0/24 +-------------+

...was scalar to begin with. If the front end is generating vector widths for which the target has no native support, and if the front end cares about the performance of that vector code, it should explicitly run the Scalarizer pass itself. AIUI, it would also be the front end's resposnsibility to identify which targets have support for which vector widths and which would instead use scalarisation. That seems to be a less clean interface. E.g. as things stand today, llvmpipe is able to do everything it needs to do with generic IR. Porting it to a new target is a very trivial cha...

Hello, I'm trying to plot a fitted lm() line on a plot when the one explanatory variable is log transformed and log="x". I get different lines using abline and predict.lm(). #Example x <- 1:100 y <- rnorm(100) plot(y ~ x, log="x") abline(lm(y ~ log(x))) lines(x, predict(lm(y ~ log(x))), lwd=2) I'm sure I'm missing something but could someone tell me which

Hi Richard, Thanks for working on this. We should probably move this discussion to llvm-dev because it is not strictly related to the patch review anymore. The code below is not representative of general c/c++ code. Usually only domain specific language (such as OpenCL) contain vector instructions. The LLVM pass manager configuration (pass manager builder) is designed for C/C++ compilers, not