search for: responsibiltyset

...ly if it is present in the "ResponsibilitySet", that check is made on line 273. However, the inline functions are not in that set so they are not promoted to strong definitions. Shouldn't functions defined in the jitted code be our responsibility? Looking closer what happens with the ResponsibiltySet. When it is created it tries to to find symbols for all the names it knows about. Eventually the look up request ends up in my application where I use a LegacyIRCompileLayer to search for the symbol in the jitted module. That function call eventually ends up in getSymbol in RTDyldObjectLinkingLayer...

...tcode and run it with lli. This will > provide more information and the issue may be discussed easier on bitcode > level. (Not very familiar with clang-interpreter, but it looks more like an > example for illustration than a bulletproof tool.) > > Looking closer what happens with the ResponsibiltySet. When it is created > it tries to to find symbols for all the names it knows about. Eventually > the look up request ends up in my application [...] > > Instead of using the legacy resolvers you might prefer a fallback symbol > generator here. The lli tool uses this approach to provi...