search for: responsibilti

I hate to use that "noob" word, but in this case I think it might be proper. Our company is getting ready to get rid of Netware and start using Samba. It will require that users log in and by doing so, have a login script map drives to particular drive letters base on either their user or group. I've been administering Centos servers for quite a while. I have no problem with

On Sun September 15 2002 04:03, Geoff Shang wrote: > Hi: > > ah. Your mp3 player is downloading the stream instead of playing it right > away. You need to create an M3U file with your stream URL in it and link > to that on your website. Your player will download this and open the > contained URL and play it. So as an example > > stream.m3u contains: > >

Hi, all. My company is setting up a branch office in Germany, and I'm very interested in a VoIP provider over thataway. However, I'd need a few things: - Reliability. Can't have my branch office's DID's just going down. A company with a proven track record would be very, very good. - English. I speak great English, decent Spanish... and zilch German. So, as provincial as

I'm using a NT4-style domain on my home network, with Samba 3.5.3 acting as PDC. I would like to transfer PDC responsibilty to a different GNU/Linux machine so I can retire the original PDC. With Windows DCs, I understand this is simple -- just create a BDC, promote it, and remove the old. However, an analogous approach would be problematic here, because in Samba going from one DC to two is

machine (just with an updated OS and hardware.) You are not promoting/demoting domain controllers, and you don't have two DC's active at the same time. -----Original Message----- From: samba-bounces at lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] On Behalf Of Michael Deutschmann Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 8:51 PM To: samba at lists.samba.org Subject: [Samba]

I have been reading about testing in RoR for what seems like hours now in search of the answer to what is probably a simple problem. Where is the best place to test the second action explained below? I have a controller (NetworkingController) with a method (create_network_segment) that makes use of two models (NetworkSegment and NetworkIpaddress). This particular method does two actions: 1.

when an nt 4.0 workstation or backup domain controller is joined to a domain, the trust account password is set to a well-known initial value. if you are concerned about internal network security, this is not really an acceptable risk: any captured network traffic can be decoded simply from knowing the name of the workstation, which is contained in the network traffic itself. the initial value

In "Modern Applied Statistics with S-Plus" 3rd ed., footnote on page 153 regarding a model lm(Gas~Insul/(Temp+I(Temp^2))-1,whiteside), I read "Notice that when the quadratic terms are present, first degree coefficients mean 'the slope of the curve at temperature zero', so a non-significant value does not mean that the linear term is not needed.

In order to compile the latest Vorbis library on the Macintosh, the change appended to this message needs to be made to os_types.h.in. Then, anyone who wants to actually build it must first copy os_types.h.in to os_types.h by hand, since MacOS does not include a command line and thus cannot run configure. It really bugs me that the whole "platforms which don't support configure

Johannes, did you try it on AMD GPUs? If not, I think it might be early to claim it as a general interface for NVidia/AMD GPUs. I'm ok, if you want tointroduce a basic class for the GPU-specific codegen, but it must be done step-by-step and thoroughly tested and reviewed. Theremightbe some parts, common with NVPTX codegen. You can put the commonfunctions into a base class and remove them from