Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "responsibilites".
Did you mean:
responsibilities
2016 Jul 28
3
Why is Samba4 not recommended as a file server?
On 28/07/16 07:43, Michael Adam wrote:
> Exactly. And it is a recommendation for a better layout, not a strict
> requirement. Reasons being that it is genrally better to separate
> responsibilites, and that in this case, you have more control over the
> fine-tunings of a file server if it is not at the same time an AD/DC.
> Cheers - Michael
>
This is all very well and good Michael, but what if you only have one
computer ?
Microsoft recognised this and produced SBS, there are en...
2016 Jul 28
2
Why is Samba4 not recommended as a file server?
Mark Foley <mfoley at ohprs.org> writes:
> Since you bring up that topic (Samba4 not recommended as a file server), I've been meaning to
> ask on this list for a while: Why?
> [...]
>> As for the info you would like adding to the wiki, it used to be there,
>> but when the wiki was re-written, it was removed. The thinking seemed to
>> be, as samba doesn't
2006 Aug 16
1
Naming rights_roles join model using has_many :through and polymorphic associations
...oup
belongs_to :user
end
class Role < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :responsibilities
has_many :users, :through => :responsibilities
has_and_belongs_to_many :rights
end
class Right < ActiveRecord::Base
has_and_belongs_to_many :roles
end
NEW TABLES:
users
rights
roles
groups
responsibilites
rights_roles
Has anyone got any comments / corrections / ideas about this one?
Maybe a more suitable join model name than responsibilities
Leevi Graham
Front End Developer - User Interface Designer
www.leevigraham.com | Skype Me: leevi_graham
MSN Messenger: info@leevigraham.com
Download...
2016 Jul 28
0
Why is Samba4 not recommended as a file server?
...quot;, not "not using
> Samba".
>
> My understanding is that it is better to have one machine running the DC
> and another serving files.
Exactly.
And it is a recommendation for a better layout,
not a strict requirement.
Reasons being that it is genrally better to separate
responsibilites, and that in this case, you have more
control over the fine-tunings of a file server if it
is not at the same time an AD/DC.
Cheers - Michael
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: not...
2016 Jul 28
0
Why is Samba4 not recommended as a file server?
Am 28.07.2016 um 10:12 schrieb Rowland penny:
> On 28/07/16 07:43, Michael Adam wrote:
>> Exactly. And it is a recommendation for a better layout, not a strict
>> requirement. Reasons being that it is genrally better to separate
>> responsibilites, and that in this case, you have more control over the
>> fine-tunings of a file server if it is not at the same time an AD/DC.
>> Cheers - Michael
>
> This is all very well and good Michael, but what if you only have one
> computer?
then you setup a virtual machine which many...