search for: responsibilit

On 28/07/16 07:43, Michael Adam wrote: > Exactly. And it is a recommendation for a better layout, not a strict > requirement. Reasons being that it is genrally better to separate > responsibilites, and that in this case, you have more control over the > fine-tunings of a file server if it is not at the same time an AD/DC. > Cheers - Michael > This is all very well and good Michael, but what if you only have one computer ? Microsoft recognised this and produced SBS, there are...

Mark Foley <mfoley at ohprs.org> writes: > Since you bring up that topic (Samba4 not recommended as a file server), I've been meaning to > ask on this list for a while: Why? > [...] >> As for the info you would like adding to the wiki, it used to be there, >> but when the wiki was re-written, it was removed. The thinking seemed to >> be, as samba doesn't

...ed I wish to add roles to other things as well such as groups of users. What I don''t want is to have to create another join table roles_groups. I think this can be re-factored using polymorphic associations like so. NEW MODEL CLASSES: class User < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :responsibilities, :as => :roleable has_many :roles, :through => : responsibilities end class Group < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :responsibilities, :as => :roleable has_many :roles, :through => : responsibilities end class Responsibilities < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :gro...

...quot;, not "not using > Samba". > > My understanding is that it is better to have one machine running the DC > and another serving files. Exactly. And it is a recommendation for a better layout, not a strict requirement. Reasons being that it is genrally better to separate responsibilites, and that in this case, you have more control over the fine-tunings of a file server if it is not at the same time an AD/DC. Cheers - Michael -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 181 bytes Desc: no...

Am 28.07.2016 um 10:12 schrieb Rowland penny: > On 28/07/16 07:43, Michael Adam wrote: >> Exactly. And it is a recommendation for a better layout, not a strict >> requirement. Reasons being that it is genrally better to separate >> responsibilites, and that in this case, you have more control over the >> fine-tunings of a file server if it is not at the same time an AD/DC. >> Cheers - Michael > > This is all very well and good Michael, but what if you only have one > computer? then you setup a virtual machine which ma...