Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "responsibe".
Did you mean:
responsible
2008 Jul 07
2
[LLVMdev] Eager JIT
...ting all LLVM objects. I've written my own JITMemoryManager to
ensure that the binary code itself does not get deleted. Unfortunately, with
lazy compilation the stub tries to call an LLVM method while everything else
has already been deleted.
It looks like JIT::getPointerToFunctionOrStub is responsibe for creating the
stubs, and I've tried overloading it to emit the function instead of a stub,
but unfortunately the JIT class has a private constructor, making it
impossible to create a derived class.
Is there any other way to achieve this without changing LLVM code? Or does
this sound like...
2008 Jul 07
0
[LLVMdev] Eager JIT
...I’ve written my
> own JITMemoryManager to ensure that the binary code itself does not
> get deleted. Unfortunately, with lazy compilation the stub tries to
> call an LLVM method while everything else has already been deleted.
>
> It looks like JIT::getPointerToFunctionOrStub is responsibe for
> creating the stubs, and I’ve tried overloading it to emit the
> function instead of a stub, but unfortunately the JIT class has a
> private constructor, making it impossible to create a derived class.
>
> Is there any other way to achieve this without changing LLVM code?...