search for: responsabilty

On Thu, 11 Jan 2007, Eric van Riet Paap wrote: >> The switch instruction serves the same functional role. In llvm- gcc, >> the GCC "Address of label" and "indirect goto" extensions are compiled >> into a switch instruction. > > I think the question is how to branch to a location of which you do not > have a label. I'm not sure what you mean.

On Jan 11, 2007, at 7:14 AM, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Wed, 10 Jan 2007, Nicolas Geoffray wrote: >> I was looking for an indirect branch instruction in llvm, which would >> not take a BasicBlock as argument, but a value. Reid told me on >> IRC that >> there is no such instruction in llvm. >> >> Is this deliberate? Or did you never face the need of this