Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "responsabilti".
Did you mean:
responsabilit
2007 Jan 13
0
[LLVMdev] Indirect branch instruction
On Thu, 11 Jan 2007, Eric van Riet Paap wrote:
>> The switch instruction serves the same functional role. In llvm- gcc,
>> the GCC "Address of label" and "indirect goto" extensions are compiled
>> into a switch instruction.
>
> I think the question is how to branch to a location of which you do not
> have a label.
I'm not sure what you mean.
2007 Jan 11
4
[LLVMdev] Indirect branch instruction
On Jan 11, 2007, at 7:14 AM, Chris Lattner wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Jan 2007, Nicolas Geoffray wrote:
>> I was looking for an indirect branch instruction in llvm, which would
>> not take a BasicBlock as argument, but a value. Reid told me on
>> IRC that
>> there is no such instruction in llvm.
>>
>> Is this deliberate? Or did you never face the need of this