Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "resp_param".
Did you mean:
res_param
2000 Mar 20
0
smbfs patch - listing large direcories from an OS/2 server
...n a FINDNEXT
* - fixed loop_count bug
* - got rid of resume_key
+ * 20/03/00 (chrisp)
+ * - fixed FINDFIRST flags for OS/2 Server
+ * - added lastname/mask stuff back (OS/2 needs it)
*/
#include <linux/types.h>
@@ -1550,6 +1553,7 @@
int resp_param_len = 0;
int ff_searchcount = 0;
int ff_eos = 0;
+ int ff_lastname = 0;
int ff_dir_handle = 0;
int loop_count = 0;
int mask_len, i, result;
@@ -1597,16 +1601,11 @@
command = TRANSACT2_FINDFIRST;
WSET(param...
2000 Jun 28
1
[Patch] Shorter patch for smbfs 2.2.16
...@
char *p, *mask, *param = server->temp_buf;
__u16 command;
int first, entries, entries_seen;
+
+ /* Both NT and OS/2 accept info level 1 (but see note below). */
int info_level = 260;
const int max_matches = 512;
@@ -1375,11 +1605,18 @@
int resp_param_len = 0;
int ff_searchcount = 0;
int ff_eos = 0;
+ int ff_lastname = 0;
int ff_dir_handle = 0;
int loop_count = 0;
int mask_len, i, result;
static struct qstr star = { "*", 1, 0 };
+ /*
+ * use info level 1 for older serv...