search for: resolving

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 32455 matches for "resolving".

2010 Apr 15
5
Apparent BIND problem doing RBL lookups for Postfix
My apologies if I'm posting the wrong place, or am asking a common question. All my looking so far hasn't turned up anything very useful in knowing what to look at, or what to modify. --- CentOS 5, running BIND 9.3.6 i386 Hardware: P4, 2.8Ghz, 1G memory Sata drives - non mirrored etc. Load is light, usually under 0.1 -- This box is running Postfix as our mail server. BIND (9.3.6)
2009 Oct 22
19
undefined method `stringify_keys!' for "":String
i have an error undefined method `stringify_keys!'' for "":String my view is given below <%= form_tag :action => ''resolve_create'', :resolve => @resolve %> <p>resolution:<br /> <%= text_area ''resolve'',''content'', :cols => 40, :rows => 12 %></p> <%= submit_tag
2018 Nov 19
3
NetworkManager and /etc/resolv.conf
> On 11/17/18 8:31 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: >> On 11/17/2018 07:01 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: >>> On 11/17/2018 06:43 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: >>>> CentOS 7.5 image running on linode. >>>> >>>> unbound running on localhost. >>>> >>>> Have to use a cron job once a minute to keep /etc/resolv.conf using >>>> the
2013 Sep 20
6
[LLVMdev] LLD input graph handling proposal
Shankar and I discussed input file handling, and we came up with a design that may greatly simplify the input file handling, while giving more flexibility to developer to support complicated options, such as --{start,end}-group, -z rescan or -z rescan-now. It'd worth pursuing, so here's the idea: 1. We wouldn't probably want to let Resolver to handle the input graph directly, for we
2012 Jan 23
13
Template Help Please
Hello, I am trying to setup a template with data being passed in as a long string of data which is being returned via extlookup() i.e. $resolvers = "10.10.10.10 11.11.11.11.12.12.12.12" The template should split those up and put a nameserver entry per line in /etc/resolv.conf I have this in the template now:- <%=
2018 Nov 17
2
NetworkManager and /etc/resolv.conf
On 11/17/2018 07:01 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: > On 11/17/2018 06:43 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: >> CentOS 7.5 image running on linode. >> >> unbound running on localhost. >> >> Have to use a cron job once a minute to keep /etc/resolv.conf using >> the localhost for name resolution - whenever NetworkManager gets >> restarted (usually only a system boot) it
2014 Sep 05
1
Could not resolve host: mirror.centos.org
There seems to be a problem with my local dns server resolving mirror.centos.org. I know something about dns but obviously not enough to figure out what might be wrong here or how to fix this in bind configs. The SERVFAIL errors below seem to be related to AAAA and MX queries for the domain. Please advise. TIA. # host mirror.centos.org 8.8.8.8 Using domai...
2020 Sep 30
6
Bind9 issue
Rowland, To answer you first, my "example.com" registered host is a wildcat " *. example.com". Everything example.com returns my external ip address. Both bind9 and samba are running. Might add your "options" but for now, solving my problem, first. Louis, your answer in a few minutes. On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 8:09 AM Rowland penny via samba < samba at
2020 Aug 13
3
Samba DNS fails when queried with nslookup commands
Hai James, Thanks, thats exactly what we needed. I'll comment below. > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: James Atwell [mailto:james.atwell365 at gmail.com] > Verzonden: donderdag 13 augustus 2020 14:46 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > CC: L.P.H. van Belle > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Samba DNS fails when queried with > nslookup commands > > Hi Louis and
2020 Oct 01
1
Bind9 issue
...; > status=0/SUCCESS) > >? Main PID: 395 (named) > >? ? ?Tasks: 5 (limit: 2249) > >? ? Memory: 27.7M > >? ? CGroup: /system.slice/bind9.service > >? ? ? ? ? ? ??????395 /usr/sbin/named -u bind > > > > Sep 30 07:19:27 dtdc1 named[395]: network unreachable resolving ' > > dtdc1.ad.dtntwk.work/A/IN': 2001:500:2f::f#53 > > Sep 30 07:19:27 dtdc1 named[395]: network unreachable resolving ' > > dtdc1.ad.dtntwk.work/A/IN': 2001:503:c27::2:30#53 > > Sep 30 07:19:27 dtdc1 named[395]: network unreachable resolving ' > >...
2018 Nov 19
0
NetworkManager and /etc/resolv.conf
On 11/19/18 6:49 AM, Simon Matter wrote: >> On 11/17/18 8:31 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: >>> On 11/17/2018 07:01 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: >>>> On 11/17/2018 06:43 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: >>>>> CentOS 7.5 image running on linode. >>>>> >>>>> unbound running on localhost. >>>>> >>>>> Have to use a cron
2013 Sep 20
0
[LLVMdev] LLD input graph handling proposal
On Sep 20, 2013, at 3:37 PM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 3:29 PM, Nick Kledzik <kledzik at apple.com> wrote: > Rui, > > I like this in general, but have a few questions. > > On Sep 20, 2013, at 2:30 PM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote: > >> 2. We would instead add a new method nextFile() to LinkingContext,
2013 Sep 20
3
[LLVMdev] LLD input graph handling proposal
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Nick Kledzik <kledzik at apple.com> wrote: > > On Sep 20, 2013, at 3:37 PM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 3:29 PM, Nick Kledzik <kledzik at apple.com> wrote: > >> Rui, >> >> I like this in general, but have a few questions. >> >> On Sep 20, 2013, at 2:30 PM, Rui
2007 Jul 24
2
Mocking Resolv::DNS?
Hello Rspecers, I have a rails project where I am calling Resolv::DNS.open and then using the block to check a domain name. The code snippet in question is: domain = "mytest.com" Resolv::DNS.open do |dns| @mx = dns.getresources(domain, Resolv::DNS::Resource::IN::MX) end I obviously want to stub this out, especially for speed but can''t quite work out how. I
2020 Sep 30
0
Bind9 issue
...; > status=0/SUCCESS) > > Main PID: 395 (named) > > Tasks: 5 (limit: 2249) > > Memory: 27.7M > > CGroup: /system.slice/bind9.service > > ??????395 /usr/sbin/named -u bind > > > > Sep 30 07:19:27 dtdc1 named[395]: network unreachable resolving ' > > dtdc1.ad.dtntwk.work/A/IN': 2001:500:2f::f#53 > > Sep 30 07:19:27 dtdc1 named[395]: network unreachable resolving ' > > dtdc1.ad.dtntwk.work/A/IN': 2001:503:c27::2:30#53 > > Sep 30 07:19:27 dtdc1 named[395]: network unreachable resolving ' > >...
2020 Oct 23
0
new dc does not allow login..?
To fix this, i would start with. First, set the first AD-DC its resolv.conf to SERVER_IP=$(ip -o route get to 8.8.8.8 | sed -n 's/.*src \([0-9.]\+\).*/\1/p') search $(hostname -d) > resolv.conf.new nameserver ${SERVER_IP} >> resolv.conf.new nameserver 8.8.8.8 # because we want a fallback to internet, for now. >> resolv.conf.new mv /etc/resolv.conf{,.backup} mv
2020 Nov 10
4
samba-tool gpo listall error
More problems... So cat /etc/resolv.conf yields nothing. root at ad2:~# ll /etc/resolv.conf lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 39 Jun 17 2018 /etc/resolv.conf -> ../run/systemd/resolve/stub-resolv.conf Shows a broken link. Since this is Ubuntu 18.04 with systemd and the stub-resolv.conf missing, I'm lost. I'll test my google fu to try to figure this out, but if someone can point me in the right
2018 May 25
1
nameservers, all DCS??
I dont understand whats the question here. But what i can say about the resolv.conf settings if you have multiple dc's. You have to think in 2 DNS resolving settings. 1) on the server as client resolving ( resolv.conf ) 2) clients resolving ( DNS Services ) The difference explained. If i do : ping hostname this is a server which is doing a client dns request through resolve.conf If i do : dig A hostname @DNSSERVER this is a server which is do...
2018 Nov 17
0
NetworkManager and /etc/resolv.conf
On 11/17/18 8:31 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: > On 11/17/2018 07:01 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: >> On 11/17/2018 06:43 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: >>> CentOS 7.5 image running on linode. >>> >>> unbound running on localhost. >>> >>> Have to use a cron job once a minute to keep /etc/resolv.conf using >>> the localhost for name resolution - whenever
2013 Sep 20
1
[LLVMdev] LLD input graph handling proposal
Hi Nick, On 9/20/2013 5:29 PM, Nick Kledzik wrote: > Rui, > > I like this in general, but have a few questions. > > On Sep 20, 2013, at 2:30 PM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote: > >> 2. We would instead add a new method nextFile() to LinkingContext, which returns a new file from which Resolver should try to resolve undefined symbols. Resolver wouldn't