search for: resolver

...n that failure above. --- 14-Apr-2010 14:24:57.654 queries: info: client 127.0.0.1#42018: query: 33.229.242.205.zen.spamhaus.org IN A + 14-Apr-2010 14:24:57.654 security: debug 3: client 127.0.0.1#42018: query (cache) '33.229.242.205.zen.spamhaus.org/A/IN' approved 14-Apr-2010 14:24:57.654 resolver: debug 1: createfetch: 33.229.242.205.zen.spamhaus.org A 14-Apr-2010 14:24:57.654 resolver: debug 3: fctx 0x932e140(33.229.242.205.zen.spamhaus.org/A'): create 14-Apr-2010 14:24:57.654 resolver: debug 3: fctx 0x932e140(33.229.242.205.zen.spamhaus.org/A'): join 14-Apr-2010 14:24:57.654 resol...

i have an error undefined method `stringify_keys!'' for "":String my view is given below <%= form_tag :action => ''resolve_create'', :resolve => @resolve %> <p>resolution:<br /> <%= text_area ''resolve'',''content'', :cols => 40, :rows => 12 %></p> <%= submit_tag

...ed. >> >> I hope RHEL/CentOS 8 do networking better, as in, not have spaghetti >> scripts called here and there making something that should be a config >> option hard to do. >> >> With DNS the only way to trust results is if the zone is signed and >> local resolver validates. You can't ever trust external nameservers >> defined by dhcp to validate. So there's very valid reasons to want to >> use local unbound. >> _______________________________________________ > > > I don't know about CentOS 7 because I'm running Cen...

...d we came up with a design that may greatly simplify the input file handling, while giving more flexibility to developer to support complicated options, such as --{start,end}-group, -z rescan or -z rescan-now. It'd worth pursuing, so here's the idea: 1. We wouldn't probably want to let Resolver to handle the input graph directly, for we don't want to implement the details of input graph control node behavior for --{start,end}-group, -z rescan{,-now}, or whatever you define as a new linker option. Implementing it to Resolver would make it messy. 2. We would instead add a new method ne...

Hello, I am trying to setup a template with data being passed in as a long string of data which is being returned via extlookup() i.e. $resolvers = "10.10.10.10 11.11.11.11.12.12.12.12" The template should split those up and put a nameserver entry per line in /etc/resolv.conf I have this in the template now:- <%= scope.lookupvar(''resolver::params::resolvers'').split(/\s+/).each do | ns | %> nameserver <...

...rver ::1' > /etc/resolv.conf seems to do what I need. I hope RHEL/CentOS 8 do networking better, as in, not have spaghetti scripts called here and there making something that should be a config option hard to do. With DNS the only way to trust results is if the zone is signed and local resolver validates. You can't ever trust external nameservers defined by dhcp to validate. So there's very valid reasons to want to use local unbound.

There seems to be a problem with my local dns server resolving mirror.centos.org. I know something about dns but obviously not enough to figure out what might be wrong here or how to fix this in bind configs. The SERVFAIL errors below seem to be related to AAAA and MX queries for the domain. Please advise. TIA. # host mirror.centos.org 8.8.8.8 Using domain server: Name: 8.8.8.8 Address:

Rowland, To answer you first, my "example.com" registered host is a wildcat " *. example.com". Everything example.com returns my external ip address. Both bind9 and samba are running. Might add your "options" but for now, solving my problem, first. Louis, your answer in a few minutes. On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 8:09 AM Rowland penny via samba < samba at

Hai James, Thanks, thats exactly what we needed. I'll comment below. > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: James Atwell [mailto:james.atwell365 at gmail.com] > Verzonden: donderdag 13 augustus 2020 14:46 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > CC: L.P.H. van Belle > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Samba DNS fails when queried with > nslookup commands > > Hi Louis and

...7 dtdc1 named[395]: network unreachable resolving ' > > dtdc1.ad.dtntwk.work/A/IN': 2001:dc3::35#53 > > Sep 30 07:19:27 dtdc1 named[395]: network unreachable resolving ' > > dtdc1.ad.dtntwk.work/A/IN': 2001:500:12::d0d#53 > > Sep 30 07:19:28 dtdc1 named[395]: resolver priming query complete > > > > Add the log from this morning > > > Sep 30 07:19:21 dtdc1 named[395]: starting BIND > > 9.11.5-P4-5.1+deb10u2-Debian (Extended Support Version) <id:998753c> > > > > Sep 30 07:19:21 dtdc1 named[395]: running on Linux x86_6...

...; I hope RHEL/CentOS 8 do networking better, as in, not have spaghetti >>> scripts called here and there making something that should be a config >>> option hard to do. >>> >>> With DNS the only way to trust results is if the zone is signed and >>> local resolver validates. You can't ever trust external nameservers >>> defined by dhcp to validate. So there's very valid reasons to want to >>> use local unbound. >>> _______________________________________________ >> >> >> I don't know about CentOS 7 bec...

...k at apple.com> wrote: > Rui, > > I like this in general, but have a few questions. > > On Sep 20, 2013, at 2:30 PM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote: > >> 2. We would instead add a new method nextFile() to LinkingContext, which returns a new file from which Resolver should try to resolve undefined symbols. Resolver wouldn't handle the input graph at all. Instead, Resolver calls nextFile() repeatedly to link until nextFile() returns a null value. >> >> 3. Resolver will notify Linking Context when (A) all undefined symbols are resolved (success)...

...> Rui, >> >> I like this in general, but have a few questions. >> >> On Sep 20, 2013, at 2:30 PM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote: >> >> 2. We would instead add a new method nextFile() to LinkingContext, which >> returns a new file from which Resolver should try to resolve undefined >> symbols. Resolver wouldn't handle the input graph at all. Instead, Resolver >> calls nextFile() repeatedly to link until nextFile() returns a null value. >> >> 3. Resolver will notify Linking Context when (A) all undefined symbols >&...

Hello Rspecers, I have a rails project where I am calling Resolv::DNS.open and then using the block to check a domain name. The code snippet in question is: domain = "mytest.com" Resolv::DNS.open do |dns| @mx = dns.getresources(domain, Resolv::DNS::Resource::IN::MX) end I obviously want to stub this out, especially for speed but can''t quite work out how. I

...7 dtdc1 named[395]: network unreachable resolving ' > > dtdc1.ad.dtntwk.work/A/IN': 2001:dc3::35#53 > > Sep 30 07:19:27 dtdc1 named[395]: network unreachable resolving ' > > dtdc1.ad.dtntwk.work/A/IN': 2001:500:12::d0d#53 > > Sep 30 07:19:28 dtdc1 named[395]: resolver priming query complete > > > > Add the log from this morning > > > Sep 30 07:19:21 dtdc1 named[395]: starting BIND > > 9.11.5-P4-5.1+deb10u2-Debian (Extended Support Version) <id:998753c> > > > > Sep 30 07:19:21 dtdc1 named[395]: running on Linux x86_6...

...}'` ; \ do echo "nameserver ${x}" >> /etc/resolv.conf.new ; done mv /etc/resolv.conf{,.backup-2} mv /etc/resolv.conf.new /etc/resolv.conf Above should help. If people dont see what i did here. DC1, points to itself for the DNS. DC2, when joining MUST HAVE DC1 as first DNS resolver. DC2, after the join and a reboot after the replication check, Only then you can change the resolver order. If you change resolv.conf to early, your not getting replication And that results in missing things in the ad like.. Like the UUID as shown here. > Oct 22 16:17:17 cobra samba[824]:...

More problems... So cat /etc/resolv.conf yields nothing. root at ad2:~# ll /etc/resolv.conf lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 39 Jun 17 2018 /etc/resolv.conf -> ../run/systemd/resolve/stub-resolv.conf Shows a broken link. Since this is Ubuntu 18.04 with systemd and the stub-resolv.conf missing, I'm lost. I'll test my google fu to try to figure this out, but if someone can point me in the right

I dont understand whats the question here. But what i can say about the resolv.conf settings if you have multiple dc's. You have to think in 2 DNS resolving settings. 1) on the server as client resolving ( resolv.conf ) 2) clients resolving ( DNS Services ) The difference explained. If i do : ping hostname this is a server which is doing a client dns request through resolve.conf

...; > seems to do what I need. > > I hope RHEL/CentOS 8 do networking better, as in, not have spaghetti > scripts called here and there making something that should be a config > option hard to do. > > With DNS the only way to trust results is if the zone is signed and > local resolver validates. You can't ever trust external nameservers > defined by dhcp to validate. So there's very valid reasons to want to > use local unbound. > _______________________________________________ I don't know about CentOS 7 because I'm running CentOS 6, but on other syst...

...5:29 PM, Nick Kledzik wrote: > Rui, > > I like this in general, but have a few questions. > > On Sep 20, 2013, at 2:30 PM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote: > >> 2. We would instead add a new method nextFile() to LinkingContext, which returns a new file from which Resolver should try to resolve undefined symbols. Resolver wouldn't handle the input graph at all. Instead, Resolver calls nextFile() repeatedly to link until nextFile() returns a null value. >> >> 3. Resolver will notify Linking Context when (A) all undefined symbols are resolved (success),...