search for: reship

...te on this and we just don't have the man power to accomplish such a task. This is why we have a relatively short release process. However, we do not change the tarballs after the release has been "shipped". I remember once we did have a critical issue that caused us to a quick "reship" of a tarball, but we labeled it 3.Xa" to denote the new tarball. So I ask that the changes be reverted and then hopefully we can just move forward from this misunderstanding. Thank you again for your hard work here, Tanya On Jan 13, 2013, at 11:10 AM, Pawel Wodnicki <root at 32b...

...and we just don't have the man power to accomplish such a task. This is why we have a relatively short release process. > > However, we do not change the tarballs after the release has been "shipped". I remember once we did have a critical issue that caused us to a quick "reship" of a tarball, but we labeled it 3.Xa" to denote the new tarball. > > So I ask that the changes be reverted and then hopefully we can just move forward from this misunderstanding. > It was not a misunderstanding, I have made a decision to re-ship based on the information I h...

Anton, > Pawel, > > We all understand that you're pretty new to release process, etc., but > I think you should understand the implications of your actions. > > You just created a lot of harm for really huge pile of users - the > ones who downloads the tarball via some automated build system and > rely on the known good checksum. This includes, but not limited to to

Pawel, We all understand that you're pretty new to release process, etc., but I think you should understand the implications of your actions. You just created a lot of harm for really huge pile of users - the ones who downloads the tarball via some automated build system and rely on the known good checksum. This includes, but not limited to to the users of FreeBSD, Gentoo, etc. Even worse,