search for: reserved_bi

This patch unifies the naming of DRM functions for reference counting of struct drm_gem_object. The resulting code is more aligned with the rest of the Linux kernel interfaces. Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tdz at users.sourceforge.net> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/crtc.c | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_abi16.c | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_display.c |

drm_*_reference() and drm_*_unreference() functions are just compatibility alias for drm_*_get() and drm_*_put() adn should not be used by new code. So convert all users of compatibility functions to use the new APIs. Signed-off-by: Cihangir Akturk <cakturk at gmail.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/crtc.c | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_abi16.c | 2 +-

From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu at intel.com> Use drm_*_get() and drm_*_put() helpers instead of drm_*_reference() and drm_*_unreference() helpers. Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/api/drm-get-put.cocci Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu at intel.com> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall at lip6.fr> --- tree: https://github.com/thierryreding/linux for-4.16/work

Looks good to me! Reviewed-by: Tobias Klausmann <tobias.johannes.klausmann at mni.thm.de> On 8/3/17 1:58 PM, Cihangir Akturk wrote: > drm_*_reference() and drm_*_unreference() functions are just > compatibility alias for drm_*_get() and drm_*_put() adn should not be > used by new code. So convert all users of compatibility functions to use > the new APIs. > >

This patch set replaces the occurrences of drm_*_reference() and drm_*_unreference() with the new drm_*_get() and drm_*_put() functions. All patches in the series do the same thing, converting to the new APIs. I created patches per DRM driver as suggested by Daniel Vetter. Background: In the kernel, reference counting APIs use *_get(), *_put() style naming to reference-count the objects. But DRM

If you're especially unlucky BOs would move around and their kmaps would end up pointing to something else in GART, then ioctl_pushbuf() would use the kmaps again corrupting textures or other pushbufs (the most noticeable symptom was a PFIFO_DMA_PUSHER from time to time). Signed-off-by: Francisco Jerez <currojerez at riseup.net> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c | 2 ++ 1

This patch set replaces functions named {un,reference} by their {put,get} counterparts. Affected data types are struct drm_connector, struct drm_framebuffer, struct drm_gem_object, and struct drm_device. With the reference-counting functions being named {put,get}, the DRM interface is more aligned to Linux kernel nameing standard. The patch set does not change driver-internal interfaces. Thomas

Hi there. I have two models (and two tables, of course), let''s call them Room and Reserved, with similar fields but with the last one with some extra info, and need to get data from both using a "union all". Let''s think on a hotel where I need to "glue" data to take a snapshot from the occupation like: Room (number,date,ocupied_by)

Reduces object size ~4kb Joe Perches (2): drm/nouveau: Add new logging function nv_cli_printk drm/nouveau: Convert NV_PRINTK macros and uses to new nv_cli_<level> macros drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_abi16.c | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_chan.c | 12 +++---- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c | 21 +++++++++++ drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drv.h | 44

Without diving in any of the details, your commit message has me curious and concerned... In a "manager" kind of way, despite being neither a manager nor an insider or active contributor. ;-) On 24/01/2020 14:30, Christian K?nig wrote: > From: Christian K?nig <ckoenig.leichtzumerken at gmail.com> > > While working on TTM cleanups I've found that the io_reserve_lru

On Sat, 25 Jan 2020 at 00:30, Christian K?nig <ckoenig.leichtzumerken at gmail.com> wrote: > > From: Christian K?nig <ckoenig.leichtzumerken at gmail.com> > > While working on TTM cleanups I've found that the io_reserve_lru used by > Nouveau is actually not working at all. > > In general we should remove driver specific handling from the memory > management,

Drop drm_gem_object from nouveau_bo, use the ttm_buffer_object.base instead. Build tested only. Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at redhat.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.h | 5 ----- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.h | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_abi16.c | 4 ++-- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c | 4 ++--

Drop drm_gem_object from nouveau_bo, use the ttm_buffer_object.base instead. Build tested only. Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at redhat.com> Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.h | 5 ----- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.h | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_abi16.c | 4 ++--

Drop drm_gem_object from nouveau_bo, use the ttm_buffer_object.base instead. Build tested only. Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at redhat.com> Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.h | 5 ----- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.h | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_abi16.c | 4 ++--

Drop drm_gem_object from nouveau_bo, use the ttm_buffer_object.base instead. Build tested only. Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at redhat.com> Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.h | 5 ----- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.h | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_abi16.c | 4 ++--

Drop drm_gem_object from nouveau_bo, use the ttm_buffer_object.base instead. Build tested only. Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at redhat.com> Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.h | 5 ----- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.h | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_abi16.c | 4 ++--

Hi guys, I've already send this out in September last year, but only got a response from Daniel. Could you guys please test this and tell me what you think about it? Basically I'm trying to remove all driver specific features from TTM which don't need to be inside the framework. Thanks, Christian.

From: Christian K?nig <ckoenig.leichtzumerken at gmail.com> While working on TTM cleanups I've found that the io_reserve_lru used by Nouveau is actually not working at all. In general we should remove driver specific handling from the memory management, so this patch moves the io_reserve_lru handling into Nouveau instead. The patch should be functional correct, but is only compile

While working on TTM cleanups I've found that the io_reserve_lru used by Nouveau is actually not working at all. In general we should remove driver specific handling from the memory management, so this patch moves the io_reserve_lru handling into Nouveau instead. v2: don't call ttm_bo_unmap_virtual in nouveau_ttm_io_mem_reserve v3: rebased and use both base and offset in the check v4:

On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 03:12:53PM +0200, Christian König wrote: > While working on TTM cleanups I've found that the io_reserve_lru used by > Nouveau is actually not working at all. > > In general we should remove driver specific handling from the memory > management, so this patch moves the io_reserve_lru handling into Nouveau > instead. > > The patch should be