search for: resample_sse

...ld Natvig <slicer at users.sourceforge.net> Some optimizing compilers miscompile the current SSE optimizations when full optimizations are enabled. By using output value pointer instead of a return value, we can bypass this misbehaviour. --- libspeex/resample.c | 8 ++++---- libspeex/resample_sse.h | 24 ++++++++---------------- 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) diff --git a/libspeex/resample.c b/libspeex/resample.c index 7b5a308..8131380 100644 --- a/libspeex/resample.c +++ b/libspeex/resample.c @@ -361,7 +361,7 @@ static int resampler_basic_direct_single(SpeexResampler...

Jean-Marc, At least VS2005 (what I'm using) won't compile resample_sse.h with _USE_SSE2 defined because it refuses to cast __m128 to __m128d and vice versa. While there are intrinsics to do the casts, I thought it would be simpler to just use an intrinsic that accomplishes the same thing without all the casting. Thanks, --John @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ static inline do...

.. And a version without the API changes. -------------- next part -------------- Index: libspeex/resample_sse.h =================================================================== --- libspeex/resample_sse.h (revision 0) +++ libspeex/resample_sse.h (revision 0) @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +/* Copyright (C) 2002-2008 Jean-Marc Valin + * Copyright (C) 2008 Thorvald Natvig + */ +/** + @file resample_sse.h + @brief...

...amplerState *st, spx_uint32_t *buff_len); + /** Make sure that the first samples to go out of the resamplers don't have * leading zeros. This is only useful before starting to use a newly created * resampler. It is recommended to use that when resampling an audio file, as Index: libspeex/resample_sse.h =================================================================== --- libspeex/resample_sse.h (revision 0) +++ libspeex/resample_sse.h (revision 0) @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +/* Copyright (C) 2002-2008 Jean-Marc Valin + * Copyright (C) 2008 Thorvald Natvig + */ +/** + @file resample_sse.h + @brief...

Dear Nikos, thanks! But you use Opus only for resampling, not for entirely replacing Speex, don't you? Greetings! Hermie Am 07.05.2013 22:53, schrieb Nikos Chantziaras: > The Opus resampler is actually a bugfixed version of the Speex one. Same > interface/API, but with the bugs removed. It's why I recommended it :-) > Otherwise I would have recommended something entirely

I'm not using Opus at all. I'm just including its resampler in my own sources. It's not even a DLL; it's directly compiled together with the rest of my code. You need these sources from the opus-tools package (http://www.opus-codec.org/downloads/): arch.h resample.c resample_sse.h speex_resampler.h stack_alloc.h In your project file, define these macros: #define SPX_RESAMPLE_EXPORT #define OUTSIDE_SPEEX #define RANDOM_PREFIX NAME_OF_YOUR_SOFTWARE If your software is actually a library itself, you might to instead: #define SPX_RESAMPLE_EXPORT __declspec(dlle...

...define PSHR(a,shift) (SHR((a)+((EXTEND32(1)<<((shift))>>1)),shift)) diff --git a/libspeex/resample.c b/libspeex/resample.c index 3829715..7957c61 100644 --- a/libspeex/resample.c +++ b/libspeex/resample.c @@ -99,6 +99,10 @@ static void speex_free (void *ptr) {free(ptr);} #include "resample_sse.h" #endif +#ifdef _USE_NEON +#include "resample_neon.h" +#endif + /* Numer of elements to allocate on the stack */ #ifdef VAR_ARRAYS #define FIXED_STACK_ALLOC 8192 @@ -360,11 +364,12 @@ static int resampler_basic_direct_single(SpeexResamplerState *st, spx_uint32_t c }...

From: Jyri Sarha <jsarha at ti.com> I optimized Speex resampler for NEON capable ARM CPUs. The first patch should speed up resampling on any platform that can spare the increased memory usage. It would be nice to have these merged to the master branch. Please let me know if there is anything I can do to help the the merge. The patches have been rebased on top of master branch in