search for: reread

Hi Is it possible to send SIGHUP to the parant process to let samba reread the smb.conf file, or is any way to let samba reread this file without restarting samba regards Alaa

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3212 Bug ID: 3212 Summary: Ability to add ssh certiicate to ssh agent to existing private key without rereading private key from filesystem Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 8.2p1 Hardware: amd64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: ssh-add Assignee: unassi...

...can I do > > this without restarting icecast so that at a SPECIFIC TIME (let's say at > > exactly 3:00 pm) a new song can be played without interupting the user > > listening to the broadcast. > > ices can be signalled to skip to the next track (which will mean a > reread of the playlist if it has changed) > I tried it, it doesn't just reread !! You have to stop and start ices !!! -- Mohamed Eldesoky www.eldesoky.net RHCE

Hello, can tincd reread the hosts dir and accept new connections without breaking existing ones? Is there a better way, letting tincd be aware of new pub keys and hosts? thx, Axel Tinc: Discussion list about the tinc VPN daemon Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/lists/ Tinc site: http://tinc.nl.linux....

The docs say that sending SIGHUP to smbd triggers an immediate reread of the configuration. There's generally more than one instance of smbd running, though. Can I send the signal to any one, or is there one in particular that handles it, or must I send it to all of them? More to the point, my embedded system stores a single process ID in /var/run/smbd.pid; will...

Le 25/08/2019 ? 23:07, Stephen John Smoogen a ?crit?: > I have had several people explain to me that my comments were > out-of-place and out-of-turn. When I wrote them originally I thought I > was going from experience of previous releases and thought I was being > matter of fact. In rereading I realized I was crass and grumpy. My > un-reserved apologies for that. I should have either not posted or > waited, reread and rewritten. Just for the record. I found your post not grumpy at all and to the point. But then, I live in a country where the average joke from your good-humoure...

...single instance of ices >at startup, and then signal ices when the user has selected the next song. > > As far as I can tell im_playlist doesn't check for pl->nexttrack until it >is at the end of the file. What would be the best way to force this tight >loop to immediately reread it's playlist? I see two options It'll skip to the next file if you send ices SIGHUP (I think. I may have ended up using a different signal). It definately doesn't wait until end of file to check that. Michael <p>--- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ icec...

...eased the file length by 20 bytes. I will get the *old* version of the file, but then padded out to the correct length with 20 nullchars at the end. When this happens, I've found the following seems to force Linux to get a correct copy: delete a big chunk of the file, save it (from Win98), reread it from Linux, put the big chunk back, and then reread it again. I used a network sniffer to monitor the packets. What I found is that, when the problem occurs, Linux sends SMB requests to query the path info for the file and open the file, but does not actually reread the file. My conclusion...

...otto spawn a single instance of ices at startup, and then signal ices when the user has selected the next song. As far as I can tell im_playlist doesn't check for pl->nexttrack until it is at the end of the file. What would be the best way to force this tight loop to immediately reread it's playlist? I see two options 1. Write some extra code to check for a nexttrack == 1 inside the while(1) playlist_read 2. Force pl->current_file to the end of the stream The only reason I hesitate on 2 is that I'm wondering what side effects forcing a "zip" to the end of...

...at startup, and then signal ices when the user has selected the next song. > > > > As far as I can tell im_playlist doesn't check for pl->nexttrack > until it > >is at the end of the file. What would be the best way to force this tight > >loop to immediately reread it's playlist? I see two options > >It'll skip to the next file if you send ices SIGHUP (I think. I may have >ended up using a different signal). It definately doesn't wait until >end of file to check that. > >Michael > > >--- >8 ---- >List archives: ht...

Greetings, Is the correct way to have the smbd and nmbd to reload a changed smb.conf somthing like the below script? #!/bin/sh smbspool=/var/spool/samba pidfiledir=/var/run smbd=/usr/local/sbin/smbd nmbd=/usr/local/sbin/nmbd kill -s SIGHUP `cat $pidfiledir/smbd.pid` kill -s SIGHUP `cat $pidfiledir/nmbd.pid` Would this cause any side effects? Thanks and thoughts welcome! -- Richard

...sing older version, but I see this also on completely unpatched 1.0.16. Or this was intentional? What I had broken then? -- http://lynxlynx.tk/ Power electronics made simple Unix and simple KISS C code ----------- ???????? ????? ----------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: tinc-1.0.16_reread_own_hostfile.patch Type: application/octet-stream Size: 562 bytes Desc: ??????????? URL: <http://www.tinc-vpn.org/pipermail/tinc/attachments/20151018/b717d4b3/attachment.obj>

...without problems. But recently I have installed dovecot 2.0.12, and they are slow. very slow. Creating index files takes about 10 minutes for ~20M file with 560 messages for bzipped mbox, for gzipped is little better but still unusable :( Stracing dovecot process shows that every ~ 20 messages it rereads complete mbox file. Am I doing something wrong? KJ -- http://modnebzdury.wordpress.com/2009/10/01/niewiarygodny-list-prof-majewskiej-wprowadzenie/

On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 17:02:09 +0100 richard lucassen via nsd-users <nsd-users at lists.nlnetlabs.nl> wrote: > The problem is (was) that I used "include:" statements in nsd.conf > to load zone information. Apparently nsd does not reread the include > files upon a SIGHUP. I scripted everything into 1 file and a HUP > rereads the zone info now. Wrong, I made a mistake it does not. A SIGHUP does not make nsd reread it's config file. When using nsd-control I get an error: # nsd-control delzone test.xaq.nl error zone define...

...st.xml: <input> <module>playlist</module> <param name="type">basic</param> <param name="file">/etc/icecast2/playlist.txt</param> <param name="random">1</param> <param name="restart-after-reread">0</param> <param name="once">0</param> </input> Here's my questions: 1. Despite the 0 setting for my "restart-after-reread" parameter, anytime I manually update my playlist file, my playlist starts over again. Though "random",...

Hello all, I just notice the new feature in the latest version 4 release. Any one know how to do this ? I have tried lvextend the partition size in dom0, but domU doesn''t see the change. I also need to reboot to make domU reread the block size. Any idea? Best regards, Chao-Rui _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

I have read and reread the boxplot and the boxplot stats page, and I still cannot understand how and what boxplot shows. I realize that this might be due to me not knowing enough statistics, but anyway... First, how does boxplot determine the size of the box? And is the line inside the box the mean or the median (or som...

I am happy using icecast/ices, but have two questions: 1. If I was using cron to schedule a switching of a playlist, can I do this without restarting icecast so that at a SPECIFIC TIME (let's say at exactly 3:00 pm) a new song can be played without interupting the user listening to the broadcast. 2. Is there a setting when the user first connects to play a *welcome* file (i.e. about the

I followed the NUT instructions that are on the projects site, I think, and they said to set up USBD, so I did. Is that necessary for average users using one PC (rather than servers), or will something not work right if I reread and turn off USBD?

I have an openssh RPM package that restarts the sshd server during an upgrade if the daemon is already running. So far, so good, restart works. But I observed the following behaviour: - when issuing rpm -Uvh bla.rpm, rpm, obviously, opens the rpm file and gets a file descriptor. Say, 8. - rpm does its stuff and spawns a shell to execute the %post script. The shell also gets fd 8 (should rpm