Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "requset".
Did you mean:
request
2002 Sep 05
2
Requset regarding packet marking.
Hello Sir,
I want some help from you. I have my configuration like this. I
have three machines. PC1,PC2,PC3.
hub hub
PC1--------------------PC2-----------------------PC3
eth0 eth0,eth1 eth0
I want to work my configuration like diffserv. I am generating
traffic from PC3 and sending it to PC1 via PC2(as a router)and
from
2013 Jul 03
1
bcmxcp: Patch for using command map if present to control commands added by dstate_addcmd
...nds. length 1 */
#define PW_OUT_MON_BLOCK_REQ (unsigned char)0x41 /* Outlet monitor
request length 1 */
#define PW_COM_CAP_REQ (unsigned char)0x42 /* Request
communication capabilities. length 2 */
-#define PW_UPS_TOP_DATA_REQ (unsigned char)0x43 /* Requsest ups
topology data requset. length 1 */
+#define PW_UPS_TOP_DATA_REQ (unsigned char)0x43 /* Request ups
topology data requset. length 1 */
-/* Need autorisation before this commands */
+/* Need autorisation before these commands */
#define PW_UPS_ON (unsigned char)0x89 /* UPS on command. length
1-2 */...
2004 Nov 19
3
ip-cref and route nat.
...router".
I''ve tried 2.6.8.1 kernel. And found out that there exist option "IP: fast
network address translation" under "IP: advanced router" that is absent in
2.6.9. When I enable this option the kernel seems to accept my command. My
router starts to answer arp requsets for <inet_ip_addres>, as it should. But
no route DNAT seems to occur. If I add some LOG rule to FORWARD iptables chain
I can see packets to <inet_ip_address> being forwarded but not DNATed as it
should.
Who supports this route nat code in the kernel? Are they going to support this...