search for: requireintegr

...Now only somewhere in 2018 MS is pushing to the need of, the use of FQDN names in the internal (lan) side and Internet Side. So, dont use this. [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Policies\Microsoft\Windows\NetworkProvider\HardenedPaths] "\\\\*\\NETLOGON"="RequireMutualAuthentication=0, RequireIntegrity=0,RequirePrivacy=0" "\\\\*\\SYSVOL"="RequireMutualAuthentication=0, RequireIntegrity=0,RequirePrivacy=0" "\\\\{MyWindowsDomainName}\\netlogon"="RequireMutualAuthentication=0, RequireIntegrity=0,RequirePrivacy=0" You "should" use .. [HKEY_L...

...cted...." I've tried a few things, including:- Setting registry entries for:- DomainCompatibilityMode = 1 DNSNameResolutionRequired = 0 Then:- [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINESOFTWAREPoliciesMicrosoftWindowsNetworkProviderHardenedPaths] "\\*\netlogon"="RequireMutualAuthentication=0,RequireIntegrity=0,RequirePrivacy=0" [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINESOFTWAREWow6432NodePoliciesMicrosoftWindowsNetworkProviderHardenedPaths] "\\*\netlogon"="RequireMutualAuthentication=0,RequireIntegrity=0,RequirePrivacy=0" I've tried adding entries for the domain controller in hosts and lmhos...

[ Rowland, i know, i need to upgrade. ;-) ] Some month ago, with a relative big bunch of fix&tweaks, i was able to put a Win10 1903 client in join to a 'NT mode' Samba domain. Now i'm trying to do the same with a 1909 version; all seems to work as before, BUT netlogon script (defined in smb.conf with: logon script = startup.bat ) simply seems does not run. No log event in

On 13/04/16 21:32, Marc Muehlfeld wrote: > Hello, > > Am 13.04.2016 um 13:20 schrieb lejeczek: >> I have a win10 which is (from what I see) a good member of samba domain >> except for one thing - it does not seem to a few simply things from a >> logon.bat, or does not do anything with it. >> would you share your thoughts? > We can't, if you don't share

...omainCompatibilityMode = 1 >>> DNSNameResolutionRequired = 0 >>> >>> Then:- >>> >> [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINESOFTWAREPoliciesMicrosoftWindowsNetworkProv >> iderHardenedPaths] >>> >> "\\*\netlogon"="RequireMutualAuthentication=0,RequireIntegrity >> =0,RequirePrivacy=0" >>> >> [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINESOFTWAREWow6432NodePoliciesMicrosoftWindows >> NetworkProviderHardenedPaths] >>> >> "\\*\netlogon"="RequireMutualAuthentication=0,RequireIntegrity >> =0,RequirePrivacy=0" &g...

Hi Guys, I am trying to connect Windows 10 to Samba domain controller. Windows 10 fails to get GPO’s because it can’t access SysVol with permissions. The domain Windows 10 is going through for SysVol would be \\example.com\SysVol when I navigate to this as Admin it does not let me go with credentials however if I use the servers hostname \\voyager\Sysvol I can access the directory. We have a

Hi, in a small office an old server is running Samba 3.2.15 on Debian Lenny. It is used for domain authentication and file sharing, and all Windows clients - currently up to Windows 7 - work perfectly fine with that. Now my question, to which I cannot easily find an answer on Google, is: if a client is upgraded to Windows 10, will it still work with that old Samba version? A server upgrade is

...o had to set an additional regpatch for Win10 and a Samba 4.3.x NT4-style domain for logon scripts - otherwise the logon scripts are not running: [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Policies\Microsoft\Windows\NetworkProvider\HardenedPaths] "\\\\*\\netlogon"="RequireMutualAuthentication=0,RequireIntegrity=0,RequirePrivacy=0" Complete regpatch: ############################################################################ Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00 ; ; windows10_join_enable.reg ; ; This registry keys are needed for a Windows 10 Client to join ; and logon to a Samba 4.3.x domain. ;...

...ntries for:- > > DomainCompatibilityMode = 1 > > DNSNameResolutionRequired = 0 > > > > Then:- > > > [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINESOFTWAREPoliciesMicrosoftWindowsNetworkProv > iderHardenedPaths] > > > "\\*\netlogon"="RequireMutualAuthentication=0,RequireIntegrity > =0,RequirePrivacy=0" > > > [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINESOFTWAREWow6432NodePoliciesMicrosoftWindows > NetworkProviderHardenedPaths] > > > "\\*\netlogon"="RequireMutualAuthentication=0,RequireIntegrity > =0,RequirePrivacy=0" > > > > I...

Upgrading Win7-32 (connected to Samba as NT-PDC) to Win10 requires - disable HardenedUncPaths (MutualAuth & Integrity) - install NTVDM - enable LegacyConsole otherwise the logon-script in Netlogon does not run, even if samba.cnf contains "server max level = NT1" Is Samba as NT-PDC supposed to handle HardenedUncPaths? Did I miss that I should have enabled that somehow in smb.conf?

Hello We have a problem with our Windows 10 Clients. Installed on a SLES12 Server is samba v4.4 I can bind the clients to the domain without any problem. Afterwards I want to login in the domain, I get the error, no logonserver available I can change in the smb conf max protocol to NT1 -> now it is possible to login with user xxx in the domain We don't want to use our samba server

try these settings for your GPO. Solution: GPEDIT.MSC -> Computer -> Administrative templates -> Network -> Networkprovider -> Hardened UNC Paths Added \\foo.lan\netlogon and Value: RequireMutualAuthentication=0,RequireIntegrity=0,RequirePrivacy=0 add \\foo\netlogon also Greetz, Louis >-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Thomas Miller >Verzonden: maandag 10 augustus 2015 11:17 >Aan: samba at lists.samba.org >Onderwerp: [Samba] Samba Wind...

...> Network -> Networkprovider -> Hardened UNC Paths   - Set on "Enabled". - Under options, click on the "Show..." button - Under "Value name", enter: \\servername\netlogon ( or \\*\netlogon ) - Under "Value" enter: RequireMutualAuthentication=0, RequireIntegrity=0     Greetz,   Louis     > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens mourik jan c > heupink > Verzonden: woensdag 7 oktober 2015 15:03 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] gpo failure >...

...ease notes of Samba 4.4.1 several times, I still do not know whether I must manually adjust smb.conf to be protected from these vulnerabilities. What I do know is that Windows 10 cannot access the Netlogon share of samba-4.4.3 running as NT4-DC, unless I disable RequireMutualAuthentication and RequireIntegrity on the clients. Is this the way it is intended to work, or should Samba with activated badlock patches provide Authentication and Integrity? Would this configuration also work with older Windows Clients (mostly Win7, but one has to be XP for a few more weeks). Is there a difference in UNC har...

...in Samba 3 domain: netlogon share access denied" Its not only for windows 10, also 7 and 8.x Solution: GPEDIT.MSC -> Computer -> Administrative templates -> Network -> Networkprovider -> Hardened UNC Paths Added \\foo.lan\netlogon and Value: RequireMutualAuthentication=0,RequireIntegrity=0,RequirePrivacy=0 also added this for \\dc1\... and \\dc1.e2c.lan\... works :) >-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Zerwes, Klaus >Verzonden: maandag 13 juli 2015 15:53 >Aan: Sébastien Le Ray; Samba Mailing List >Ond...

Hi list, I've a strange issue with Windows 7 (also occurs on 8.1) when accessing shares on domain controllers. If I use IP address or in-domain FQDN (server.domain.name), all is right. If I use another DNS entry pointing to the same IP, share access fails with following message (translated from french) : \\somehost.somsuffix\someshare is not accessible. […] Invalid parameter Issue

I just joined a Windows 10 (build 10130) to our Samba 3 domain. It seems to work. I can login, a home directory is created on the server, and I can access shares. All shares are OK, except "netlogon". Logon scripts don't run, and I cannot open the netlogon share. I get "Access denied" and a prompt to enter my username and password, which keeps coming back. At the

any messages in the windows 10 event logs, that could give some extra insight. according to https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/7f5207cc-b202-47fc-bbb8-9ebe46a31961/network-logon-script-failure?forum=WinPreview2014General >\\foo.lan\netlogon should work. but, https://adsecurity.org/?p=1405 has some good info about the latest patch about hardening GPO. (which imo wil be