search for: req_vq

This series implements virtio-scsi queue steering, which gives performance improvements of up to 50% (measured both with QEMU and tcm_vhost backends). The patches build on top of the new virtio APIs at http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.virtualization/18431; the new API simplifies the locking of the virtio-scsi driver nicely, thus it makes sense to require them as a prerequisite.

This series implements virtio-scsi queue steering, which gives performance improvements of up to 50% (measured both with QEMU and tcm_vhost backends). The patches build on top of the new virtio APIs at http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.virtualization/18431; the new API simplifies the locking of the virtio-scsi driver nicely, thus it makes sense to require them as a prerequisite.

This series implements virtio-scsi queue steering, which gives performance improvements of up to 50% (measured both with QEMU and tcm_vhost backends). This version rebased on Rusty's virtio ring rework patches. We hope this can go into virtio-next together with the virtio ring rework pathes. V5: improving the grammar of 1/5 (Paolo) move the dropping of sg_elems to 'virtio-scsi: use

This series implements virtio-scsi queue steering, which gives performance improvements of up to 50% (measured both with QEMU and tcm_vhost backends). This version rebased on Rusty's virtio ring rework patches. We hope this can go into virtio-next together with the virtio ring rework pathes. V5: improving the grammar of 1/5 (Paolo) move the dropping of sg_elems to 'virtio-scsi: use

This series implements virtio-scsi queue steering, which gives performance improvements of up to 50% (measured both with QEMU and tcm_vhost backends). This version rebased on Rusty's virtio ring rework patches. We hope this can go into virtio-next together with the virtio ring rework pathes. V4: rebase on virtio ring rework patches (rusty's pending-rebases branch) V3 and be found

This series implements virtio-scsi queue steering, which gives performance improvements of up to 50% (measured both with QEMU and tcm_vhost backends). This version rebased on Rusty's virtio ring rework patches. We hope this can go into virtio-next together with the virtio ring rework pathes. V4: rebase on virtio ring rework patches (rusty's pending-rebases branch) V3 and be found

This series implements virtio-scsi queue steering, which gives performance improvements of up to 50% (measured both with QEMU and tcm_vhost backends). This version rebased on Rusty's virtio ring rework patches, which has already gone into virtio-next today. We hope this can go into virtio-next together with the virtio ring rework pathes. V7: respin to fix the patch apply error V6: rework

This series implements virtio-scsi queue steering, which gives performance improvements of up to 50% (measured both with QEMU and tcm_vhost backends). This version rebased on Rusty's virtio ring rework patches, which has already gone into virtio-next today. We hope this can go into virtio-next together with the virtio ring rework pathes. V7: respin to fix the patch apply error V6: rework

This series implements virtio-scsi queue steering, which gives performance improvements of up to 50% (measured both with QEMU and tcm_vhost backends). This version rebased on Rusty's virtio ring rework patches, which has already gone into virtio-next today. We hope this can go into virtio-next together with the virtio ring rework pathes. V6: rework "redo allocation of target data"

This series implements virtio-scsi queue steering, which gives performance improvements of up to 50% (measured both with QEMU and tcm_vhost backends). This version rebased on Rusty's virtio ring rework patches, which has already gone into virtio-next today. We hope this can go into virtio-next together with the virtio ring rework pathes. V6: rework "redo allocation of target data"

One of the more common cases of allocation size calculations is finding the size of a structure that has a zero-sized array at the end, along with memory for some number of elements for that array. For example: struct virtio_scsi { ... struct virtio_scsi_vq req_vqs[]; }; Make use of the struct_size() helper instead of an open-coded version in order to avoid any potential type mistakes. So, replace the following form: sizeof(*vscsi) + sizeof(vscsi->req_vqs[0]) * num_queues with: struct_size(vscsi, req_vqs, num_queues) This code was detected with the...

One of the more common cases of allocation size calculations is finding the size of a structure that has a zero-sized array at the end, along with memory for some number of elements for that array. For example: struct virtio_scsi { ... struct virtio_scsi_vq req_vqs[]; }; Make use of the struct_size() helper instead of an open-coded version in order to avoid any potential type mistakes. So, replace the following form: sizeof(*vscsi) + sizeof(vscsi->req_vqs[0]) * num_queues with: struct_size(vscsi, req_vqs, num_queues) This code was detected with the...

Hi all, this series adds multiqueue support to the virtio-scsi driver, based on Jason Wang's work on virtio-net. It uses a simple queue steering algorithm that expects one queue per CPU. LUNs in the same target always use the same queue (so that commands are not reordered); queue switching occurs when the request being queued is the only one for the target. Also based on Jason's

Hi all, this series adds multiqueue support to the virtio-scsi driver, based on Jason Wang's work on virtio-net. It uses a simple queue steering algorithm that expects one queue per CPU. LUNs in the same target always use the same queue (so that commands are not reordered); queue switching occurs when the request being queued is the only one for the target. Also based on Jason's

Hi Pankaj, On Tue, 11 Jun 2019 23:34:50 -0400 (EDT) Pankaj Gupta <pagupta at redhat.com> wrote: > Hi Cornelia, > > > On Tue, 11 Jun 2019 22:07:57 +0530 > > Pankaj Gupta <pagupta at redhat.com> wrote: > > > + err1 = virtqueue_kick(vpmem->req_vq); > > > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vpmem->pmem_lock, flags); > > > + /* > > > + * virtqueue_add_sgs failed with error different than -ENOSPC, we can't > > > + * do anything about that. > > > + */ > > > > Does it make sense to...

Hi all, this series adds multiqueue support to the virtio-scsi driver, based on Jason Wang's work on virtio-net. It uses a simple queue steering algorithm that expects one queue per CPU. LUNs in the same target always use the same queue (so that commands are not reordered); queue switching occurs when the request being queued is the only one for the target. Also based on Jason's

Hi all, this series adds multiqueue support to the virtio-scsi driver, based on Jason Wang's work on virtio-net. It uses a simple queue steering algorithm that expects one queue per CPU. LUNs in the same target always use the same queue (so that commands are not reordered); queue switching occurs when the request being queued is the only one for the target. Also based on Jason's

...t;req, sizeof(req_data->req)); > + sgs[0] = &sg; > + sg_init_one(&ret, &req_data->resp.ret, sizeof(req_data->resp)); > + sgs[1] = &ret; > + > + spin_lock_irqsave(&vpmem->pmem_lock, flags); > + /* > + * If virtqueue_add_sgs returns -ENOSPC then req_vq virtual > + * queue does not have free descriptor. We add the request > + * to req_list and wait for host_ack to wake us up when free > + * slots are available. > + */ > + while ((err = virtqueue_add_sgs(vpmem->req_vq, sgs, 1, 1, req_data, > + GFP_ATOMIC)) == -ENOSP...

...t;req, sizeof(req_data->req)); > + sgs[0] = &sg; > + sg_init_one(&ret, &req_data->resp.ret, sizeof(req_data->resp)); > + sgs[1] = &ret; > + > + spin_lock_irqsave(&vpmem->pmem_lock, flags); > + /* > + * If virtqueue_add_sgs returns -ENOSPC then req_vq virtual > + * queue does not have free descriptor. We add the request > + * to req_list and wait for host_ack to wake us up when free > + * slots are available. > + */ > + while ((err = virtqueue_add_sgs(vpmem->req_vq, sgs, 1, 1, req_data, > + GFP_ATOMIC)) == -ENOSP...

...q_buf); > + sg_init_one(&sg, req->name, strlen(req->name)); > + sgs[0] = &sg; > + sg_init_one(&ret, &req->ret, sizeof(req->ret)); > + sgs[1] = &ret; > + > + spin_lock_irqsave(&vpmem->pmem_lock, flags); > + err = virtqueue_add_sgs(vpmem->req_vq, sgs, 1, 1, req, GFP_ATOMIC); > + if (err) { > + dev_err(&vdev->dev, "failed to send command to virtio pmem device\n"); > + > + list_add_tail(&vpmem->req_list, &req->list); > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vpmem->pmem_lock, flags); > + > + /...