Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "req_probe".
Did you mean:
err_probe
2017 Sep 20
1
[RFC] virtio-iommu version 0.4
Hi Jean,
On 19/09/2017 12:47, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> On 12/09/17 18:13, Auger Eric wrote:
>> 2.6.7
>> - As I am currently integrating v0.4 in QEMU here are some other comments:
>> At the moment struct virtio_iommu_req_probe flags is missing in your
>> header. As such I understood the ACK protocol was not implemented by the
>> driver in your branch.
>
> Uh indeed. And yet I could swear I've written that code... somewhere. I
> will add it to the batch of v0.5 changes, it shouldn't be too in...
2017 Sep 20
1
[RFC] virtio-iommu version 0.4
Hi Jean,
On 19/09/2017 12:47, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> On 12/09/17 18:13, Auger Eric wrote:
>> 2.6.7
>> - As I am currently integrating v0.4 in QEMU here are some other comments:
>> At the moment struct virtio_iommu_req_probe flags is missing in your
>> header. As such I understood the ACK protocol was not implemented by the
>> driver in your branch.
>
> Uh indeed. And yet I could swear I've written that code... somewhere. I
> will add it to the batch of v0.5 changes, it shouldn't be too in...
2017 Sep 21
0
[RFC] virtio-iommu version 0.4
...te:
> Hi Jean,
> On 19/09/2017 12:47, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
>> Hi Eric,
>>
>> On 12/09/17 18:13, Auger Eric wrote:
>>> 2.6.7
>>> - As I am currently integrating v0.4 in QEMU here are some other comments:
>>> At the moment struct virtio_iommu_req_probe flags is missing in your
>>> header. As such I understood the ACK protocol was not implemented by the
>>> driver in your branch.
>>
>> Uh indeed. And yet I could swear I've written that code... somewhere. I
>> will add it to the batch of v0.5 changes, it shou...
2017 Sep 12
1
[RFC] virtio-iommu version 0.4
...ucing such a large framework for this tiny feature may seem
> overkill, but it is needed for future extensions of the virtio-iommu and I
> believe it really is worth the effort.
2.6.7
- As I am currently integrating v0.4 in QEMU here are some other comments:
At the moment struct virtio_iommu_req_probe flags is missing in your
header. As such I understood the ACK protocol was not implemented by the
driver in your branch.
- VIRTIO_IOMMU_PROBE_PROPERTY_TYPE_MASK is VIRTIO_IOMMU_T_MASK in your
header too.
2.6.8.2:
- I am really confused about what the device should report as resv
regions depending o...