search for: req_don

Hi, These patches try to support multi virtual queues(multi-vq) in one virtio-blk device, and maps each virtual queue(vq) to blk-mq's hardware queue. With this approach, both scalability and performance on virtio-blk device can get improved. For verifying the improvement, I implements virtio-blk multi-vq over qemu's dataplane feature, and both handling host notification from each vq and

Hi, These patches try to support multi virtual queues(multi-vq) in one virtio-blk device, and maps each virtual queue(vq) to blk-mq's hardware queue. With this approach, both scalability and performance on virtio-blk device can get improved. For verifying the improvement, I implements virtio-blk multi-vq over qemu's dataplane feature, and both handling host notification from each vq and

...ns. */ > int index; > + > + /* num of vqs */ > + int num_vqs; > + struct virtio_blk_vq *vqs; > }; > > struct virtblk_req > @@ -133,14 +140,15 @@ static void virtblk_done(struct virtqueue *vq) > { > struct virtio_blk *vblk = vq->vdev->priv; > bool req_done = false; > + int qid = vq->index; > struct virtblk_req *vbr; > unsigned long flags; > unsigned int len; > > - spin_lock_irqsave(&vblk->vq_lock, flags); > + spin_lock_irqsave(&vblk->vqs[qid].lock, flags); > do { > virtqueue_disable_cb(vq); &g...

...ns. */ > int index; > + > + /* num of vqs */ > + int num_vqs; > + struct virtio_blk_vq *vqs; > }; > > struct virtblk_req > @@ -133,14 +140,15 @@ static void virtblk_done(struct virtqueue *vq) > { > struct virtio_blk *vblk = vq->vdev->priv; > bool req_done = false; > + int qid = vq->index; > struct virtblk_req *vbr; > unsigned long flags; > unsigned int len; > > - spin_lock_irqsave(&vblk->vq_lock, flags); > + spin_lock_irqsave(&vblk->vqs[qid].lock, flags); > do { > virtqueue_disable_cb(vq); &g...

...-47,6 +49,9 @@ struct virtio_blk /* Ida index - used to track minor number allocations. */ int index; + + /* num of vqs */ + int num_vqs; }; struct virtblk_req @@ -133,14 +138,15 @@ static void virtblk_done(struct virtqueue *vq) { struct virtio_blk *vblk = vq->vdev->priv; bool req_done = false; + int qid = vq->index; struct virtblk_req *vbr; unsigned long flags; unsigned int len; - spin_lock_irqsave(&vblk->vq_lock, flags); + spin_lock_irqsave(&vblk->vq_lock[qid], flags); do { virtqueue_disable_cb(vq); - while ((vbr = virtqueue_get_buf(vblk->vq,...

...-47,6 +49,9 @@ struct virtio_blk /* Ida index - used to track minor number allocations. */ int index; + + /* num of vqs */ + int num_vqs; }; struct virtblk_req @@ -133,14 +138,15 @@ static void virtblk_done(struct virtqueue *vq) { struct virtio_blk *vblk = vq->vdev->priv; bool req_done = false; + int qid = vq->index; struct virtblk_req *vbr; unsigned long flags; unsigned int len; - spin_lock_irqsave(&vblk->vq_lock, flags); + spin_lock_irqsave(&vblk->vq_lock[qid], flags); do { virtqueue_disable_cb(vq); - while ((vbr = virtqueue_get_buf(vblk->vq,...

..._blk /* Ida index - used to track minor number allocations. */ int index; + + /* num of vqs */ + int num_vqs; + struct virtio_blk_vq *vqs; }; struct virtblk_req @@ -133,14 +140,15 @@ static void virtblk_done(struct virtqueue *vq) { struct virtio_blk *vblk = vq->vdev->priv; bool req_done = false; + int qid = vq->index; struct virtblk_req *vbr; unsigned long flags; unsigned int len; - spin_lock_irqsave(&vblk->vq_lock, flags); + spin_lock_irqsave(&vblk->vqs[qid].lock, flags); do { virtqueue_disable_cb(vq); - while ((vbr = virtqueue_get_buf(vblk->vq,...

..._blk /* Ida index - used to track minor number allocations. */ int index; + + /* num of vqs */ + int num_vqs; + struct virtio_blk_vq *vqs; }; struct virtblk_req @@ -133,14 +142,15 @@ static void virtblk_done(struct virtqueue *vq) { struct virtio_blk *vblk = vq->vdev->priv; bool req_done = false; + int qid = vq->index; struct virtblk_req *vbr; unsigned long flags; unsigned int len; - spin_lock_irqsave(&vblk->vq_lock, flags); + spin_lock_irqsave(&vblk->vqs[qid].lock, flags); do { virtqueue_disable_cb(vq); - while ((vbr = virtqueue_get_buf(vblk->vq,...

...ed to track minor number allocations. */ > int index; > + > + /* num of vqs */ > + int num_vqs; > }; > > struct virtblk_req > @@ -133,14 +138,15 @@ static void virtblk_done(struct virtqueue *vq) > { > struct virtio_blk *vblk = vq->vdev->priv; > bool req_done = false; > + int qid = vq->index; > struct virtblk_req *vbr; > unsigned long flags; > unsigned int len; > > - spin_lock_irqsave(&vblk->vq_lock, flags); > + spin_lock_irqsave(&vblk->vq_lock[qid], flags); > do { > virtqueue_disable_cb(vq); &gt...

...ed to track minor number allocations. */ > int index; > + > + /* num of vqs */ > + int num_vqs; > }; > > struct virtblk_req > @@ -133,14 +138,15 @@ static void virtblk_done(struct virtqueue *vq) > { > struct virtio_blk *vblk = vq->vdev->priv; > bool req_done = false; > + int qid = vq->index; > struct virtblk_req *vbr; > unsigned long flags; > unsigned int len; > > - spin_lock_irqsave(&vblk->vq_lock, flags); > + spin_lock_irqsave(&vblk->vq_lock[qid], flags); > do { > virtqueue_disable_cb(vq); &gt...

Hi, These patches try to support multi virtual queues(multi-vq) in one virtio-blk device, and maps each virtual queue(vq) to blk-mq's hardware queue. With this approach, both scalability and performance on virtio-blk device can get improved. For verifying the improvement, I implements virtio-blk multi-vq over qemu's dataplane feature, and both handling host notification from each vq and

Hi, These patches try to support multi virtual queues(multi-vq) in one virtio-blk device, and maps each virtual queue(vq) to blk-mq's hardware queue. With this approach, both scalability and performance on virtio-blk device can get improved. For verifying the improvement, I implements virtio-blk multi-vq over qemu's dataplane feature, and both handling host notification from each vq and

Hi, These patches try to support multi virtual queues(multi-vq) in one virtio-blk device, and maps each virtual queue(vq) to blk-mq's hardware queue. With this approach, both scalability and performance on virtio-blk device can get improved. For verifying the improvement, I implements virtio-blk multi-vq over qemu's dataplane feature, and both handling host notification from each vq and

Hi, These patches try to support multi virtual queues(multi-vq) in one virtio-blk device, and maps each virtual queue(vq) to blk-mq's hardware queue. With this approach, both scalability and performance on virtio-blk device can get improved. For verifying the improvement, I implements virtio-blk multi-vq over qemu's dataplane feature, and both handling host notification from each vq and

Hi, This patches try to support multi virtual queues(multi-vq) in one virtio-blk device, and maps each virtual queue(vq) to blk-mq's hardware queue. With this approach, both scalability and performance problems on virtio-blk device get improved. For verifying the improvement, I implements virtio-blk multi-vq over qemu's dataplane feature, and both handling host notification from each vq

Hi, This patches try to support multi virtual queues(multi-vq) in one virtio-blk device, and maps each virtual queue(vq) to blk-mq's hardware queue. With this approach, both scalability and performance problems on virtio-blk device get improved. For verifying the improvement, I implements virtio-blk multi-vq over qemu's dataplane feature, and both handling host notification from each vq

Hi, all Changes in v7: - Using vbr->flags to trace request type - Dropped unnecessary struct virtio_blk *vblk parameter - Reuse struct virtblk_req in bio done function - Added performance data on normal SATA device and the reason why make it optional Fio test shows bio-based IO path gives the following performance improvement: 1) Ramdisk device With bio-based IO path, sequential

Hi, all Changes in v7: - Using vbr->flags to trace request type - Dropped unnecessary struct virtio_blk *vblk parameter - Reuse struct virtblk_req in bio done function - Added performance data on normal SATA device and the reason why make it optional Fio test shows bio-based IO path gives the following performance improvement: 1) Ramdisk device With bio-based IO path, sequential

...UTEX(virtio_9p_lock); static DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD(vp_wq); @@ -501,6 +504,7 @@ static int p9_virtio_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev) chan->vdev = vdev; /* We expect one virtqueue, for requests. */ + vdev->indirect_thresh = indirect_thresh; chan->vq = virtio_find_single_vq(vdev, req_done, "requests"); if (IS_ERR(chan->vq)) { err = PTR_ERR(chan->vq); -- 1.7.12

...UTEX(virtio_9p_lock); static DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD(vp_wq); @@ -501,6 +504,7 @@ static int p9_virtio_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev) chan->vdev = vdev; /* We expect one virtqueue, for requests. */ + vdev->indirect_thresh = indirect_thresh; chan->vq = virtio_find_single_vq(vdev, req_done, "requests"); if (IS_ERR(chan->vq)) { err = PTR_ERR(chan->vq); -- 1.7.12