search for: reprovisions

Using the koan command, a VM can essentially request that it be reprovisioned. Is there any way for a VM to request that it reboot from a snapshot taken with virsh? Thanks.. -- #ken B-)} Ken Coar, RHCE, RHCSA, Sanagendamgagwedweinini IT Engineering Tower, Red Hat/RDU "Millennium hand and shrimp!" -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name:

<=?windows-1252?Q?L.P.H._van_Belle?=> writes: > > Ok, > > Hi Louis, Thank you again for taking the time to help me out, I do appreciate it, and I hope you had a safe and Happy New Year's eve. I'm going to work my way through the questions/comments in your response from top to bottom: > First things is see. > > NTP > drwxr-x--- 2 root root

On 22/12/14 19:05, Marc Muehlfeld wrote: > Hello Asai, > > Am 22.12.2014 um 19:55 schrieb Rowland Penny: >>> localhost isn't the name of the ad dc, at least that's not what I >>> intended. How do I change it without reprovisioning? Can you provide >>> a link to some documentation? >> I cannot provide a link to any documentation, this is because,

Dear Samba List! Long story short and please just don't ask; if it were up to me this would have not happened: I need to recreate the default GPO-s (as in the \SysVol\domain.of\Policies\ folder and subfolders) of my domain. Trying to delete the old GPO-s I run into errors, both in the windows mmc and on the dc with runing samba-tools as root. ERROR(ldb): uncaught exception - LDAP error 50

Back to the RE-provision workbench. :-)

On 22/12/14 17:26, Asai wrote: > I don't know the difference between ntvfs and s3fs. Which one should I > use for folder redirection? ntvfs was written to for S4 but it was decided that it would not be used as it didn't have the capabilities required, so smbd from S3 was used instead. So in answer to your question, use s3fs. > > localhost isn't the name of the ad dc,

On 05/01/15 07:00, Achim Gottinger wrote: > Hello, > > I deployed an Samba 4 AD back in 2013 with .local, not knowing it can > cause troubles with mDns. > On my linux server i did not install avahi and i do not have mDns in > my nsswitch.conf hosts entry. > On windows machines i usually deinstall bonjour whenever it shows up > and i do not install it when installing

OK, there has got to be a way to work with this thing other than wiping the Domain every time an error pops up. Trying to resolve problems I did a git upgrade and: setup# /usr/local/samba/sbin/upgradeprovision Which provided the unhelpful: Found 3 domain controllers, for the moment upgradeprovision is not able to handle upgrade on domain with more than one DC, please demote the other(s)

On 27/12/15 23:14, Viktor Trojanovic wrote: > > > On 27.12.2015 20:48, Marc Muehlfeld wrote: >> Hello Viktor, >> >> Am 27.12.2015 um 19:41 schrieb Viktor Trojanovic: >>> When I provisioned a new AD domain, I used the wrong network interface >>> in the provisioning command. >>> >>> samba-tool domain provision

On Sun, 2016-01-03 at 06:00 +0000, JS wrote: > > > Other than the python error I received after running samba-tool fsmo > show, I > believe I've built a pretty solid case for poor backup strategy being > the > cause of this failure, and that reprovisioning the domain is my only > course > of action at this time. If you believe I'm getting ahead of myself, >

Hi, I recently downloaded, compiled and installed samba-ad version 4.21. AD was provisioned at domain and forest level of 2008_R2, whereas the schema level was 88. Now, how do we raise the lowest domain function level, domain and forest levels to 2012_R2 without having to reinstall and reprovision Samba-AD? Best regards, Raghav

Hi Scenario: user steve member of group called staff share called 'reports' with permissions 0750 root:staff When steve tries to access reports on xp or win7 he gets permission denied. We have to set 'reports' to 0755 for steve to have access. No amount of security tab work on the share in windows will allow him entry. We only want members of the group staff in reports but we

Hi there, I have bought 70 sipura 841 phones for a customer of mine. When following the mass provisioning guide in the admin manual for the sipura, I see it download the spa841.cfg file from my tftp server Sometimes the phone also downloads is phone specific file via tftp, and it works okay then. But, after a reboot of the phone, it is very very likely that it won't startup

I have an iaxy the is across a 802.11b link from my asterisk server. signal strength is good and it has been working fine there for about a year. Friday night lightning took out the x100p card in my asterisk server and I just got it all working again last night. Lucky I had a spare. Since I got every thing setup I have been having problems with the iaxy - I really doubt that it is lightning

On 03/01/16 06:00, JS wrote: > <=?windows-1252?Q?L.P.H._van_Belle?=> writes: > >> Ok, >> >> > Hi Louis, > > Thank you again for taking the time to help me out, I do appreciate it, and > I hope you had a safe and Happy New Year's eve. I'm going to work my way > through the questions/comments in your response from top to bottom: > >>

On 22/12/14 22:42, Asai wrote: > From what I thought I did, I named the domain avalon.local. That's > what the computers will join to. What does the netbios name have to > do with the DC? Quite a lot, AD relies on DNS, it sounds like the DC cannot find its own records, probably because /etc/hosts isn't setup correctly, you need to have the machines ipaddress and fqdn in

When I try to manage samba shares from windows, I cannot reliably get the Security Tab to show up. I have tried many reprovisions, sometimes it works, sometimes not. I cannot figure out what I'm doing wrong. How the domain is provisioned... samba-tool domain provision \ --domain=avails \ --host-name=fs.avails.com \ --host-ip=10.2.2.1 \ --adminpass='not2forget!' \ --dns-backend=BIND9_DLZ \...

<=?windows-1252?Q?L.P.H._van_Belle?=> writes: > > Hai, > > Can be incorrect rights, of corrupted db. > > Can you give the output of > > ls -al /var/lib/samba/ > ls -al /var/lib/samba/private > ls -al /var/lib/samba/private/dns > > Greetz, > > Louis > Hi Louis, thanks for your reply, here is the info you requested: ls -al

On Thu, 2023-05-11 at 23:50 +0200, Olivier MARTIN via samba wrote: > Hello, > > I was hoping to reprovision the same domain by specifying the domain > GUID in the command line tool 'samba-tool domain provision' but I am > not > sure if I missed something or if there is a bug but the specified > domain > GUID is not the one which is created for my domain. >

Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > If you are only going to have one DC, then the internal DNS server is > okay, it just doesn't work as well as Bind9. Once you have more than > one DC (which is the recommendation), then it is better to use Bind9. I have two other servers. Once the ad-cd server is up the I plan to have the other servers moved to ad and act as alternate dcs > Louis