search for: repros

For some reason proftpd stopped authentication for users. Anonymous access still works but when someone tries to access the server via their login it no longer authenticates them. I recently ran yum where proftpd was updated (that said, I'm not sure that caused the problem). I uninstalled the new version and and installed a prior version with no change. Below is a look at my config, a

All, Recently I ran across a URL documenting published research using R: http://www.cgd.ucar.edu/ccr/ammann/millennium/CODES_MBH.html A note on the site indicates that the code is being revised. The code and data are provided, so that one could reproduce the results without having to buy a proprietary software program. In poking around the R website it is clear that a lot of thought has gone

I haven't fully parsed this thread (sorry!), but I wanted to briefly mention that the SafeStack & ASan passes both do something similar (I think): move local variables backed by allocas onto a separate stack. These passes use replaceDbgDeclare to rewrite dbg.declares s.t. they point into the new stack. After that, llvm presumably runs LowerDbgDeclare (usually via InstCombine), but all the

Hi folks, I'm hitting the below assertion failure when compiling this small piece of C code (repro.c, attached). My command line is: bin/clang --target=aarch64-linux-gnu -c -O2 repro.c clang is built from top of trunk as of this morning. It only happens at -O2, and it doesn't happen with the default target (x86_64). I tried to reproduce using just 'llc -O2' but didn't

Hi Brian, On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 7:43 PM Brian Gesiak <modocache at gmail.com> wrote: > In other words, the value of %i is stored on the frame object, on the > heap, at an offset of 7 into the frame. I'm beginning to think a > fundamental fix for this issue would be to stop replacing > llvm.dbg.declare with llvm.dbg.value, and instead replace the > llvm.dbg.declare with

Vedant, Jeremy, Thanks a ton! I copied ASan's use of 'replaceDbgDeclare', think that worked! https://github.com/modocache/llvm-project/commit/afbc04e1dcba has some extremely quick and dirty changes I made (with no tests!), and a link to a Gist with the LLVM IR and DWARF produced, https://gist.github.com/modocache/6f29093ba2827946011b422ed3bd2903. There's only one kink: the spot

I need perl-Gtk2 for TinyCA2. I find it on centos.karan.org After many misteps, I add bout kbsingh-Centos-Extras.repro and kbsingh-Centos-Misc.repro to /etc/yum.repro.d I do a yum install perl-Glib and it finally goes, adding perl-ExtUtils and warning me about user mockbuild does not exist. Then I try install perl-Gtk2 and it fails: yum install perl-Gtk2 Setting up Install Process Setting

Hi, The behavior of llvm-ar appears to have changed such that the archive symbol table no longer contains symbols contained within bitcode modules in the archive. This behavior appears to have been changed with revision 184083 when the internal implementation of llvm-ar was changed from lib/Archive/Archive.cpp to lib/object/Archive.cpp. This seems to occur because ObjectFile::createObjectFile()

Helo, I'm trying to update a centos server with a kernel form the centos.plus repro because it contain Firewire/IEEE1394 support. But when y do a : # yum update The kernel from the base is more recent thant the centos plus repro I have tried with the http://wiki.centos.org/PackageManagement/Yum/Priorities plug-in and it didn't take the right kernel :

I've just done a test with a WebRTC client connecting to the repro proxy with the SIP messages relayed over TCP to Asterisk Asterisk successfully answers the call using SAVPF, SRTP and ICE. The client is greeted by the demo This was tested in the Asterisk 11 environment described in my earlier email about SRTP build issues on the asterisk-users list. This is quite useful because it proves

Looks like more iotlb locking mess? On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 10:21:00PM -0700, syzbot wrote: > syzbot has bisected this bug to: > > commit 6b1e6cc7855b09a0a9bfa1d9f30172ba366f161c > Author: Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> > Date: Thu Jun 23 06:04:32 2016 +0000 > > vhost: new device IOTLB API > > bisection log:

Looks like more iotlb locking mess? On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 10:21:00PM -0700, syzbot wrote: > syzbot has bisected this bug to: > > commit 6b1e6cc7855b09a0a9bfa1d9f30172ba366f161c > Author: Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> > Date: Thu Jun 23 06:04:32 2016 +0000 > > vhost: new device IOTLB API > > bisection log:

Thanks for notifying me. Yes, this was a recent change. Taking a look now. On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 1:49 PM, Michael Kuperstein <mkuper at google.com> wrote: > +Sanjay, who touched this last. :-) > > On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 12:44 PM, Ismail Badawi (ibadawi) via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> Hi folks, >> >> I'm hitting the

Hello everyone I was just porting a project to build against the LLVM 9 apt packages and noticed that the issue I filed and explained during the release phase in https://llvm.org/PR43035 still persists: CMake Error at /usr/lib/llvm-9/lib/cmake/llvm/LLVMExports.cmake:1323 (message):   The imported target "yaml-bench" references the file      "/usr/lib/llvm-9/bin/yaml-bench"

Hi [Adding cfe-dev to widen the net] On Tue, November 1, 2011 23:19, Richard Smith wrote: > We recently narrowed down a clang regression to the following testcase: > > struct S { static const int x; }; > template<typename T> struct U { static const int k; }; > template<typename T> const int U<T>::k = T::x; > > #ifdef TU1 > extern int f(); > const int

Hi, We recently narrowed down a clang regression to the following testcase: struct S { static const int x; }; template<typename T> struct U { static const int k; }; template<typename T> const int U<T>::k = T::x; #ifdef TU1 extern int f(); const int S::x = 42; int main() { return f() + U<S>::k; } #endif #ifdef TU2 int f() { return U<S>::k; } #endif /* Steps

Hi Sean On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 5:10 AM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> wrote: > > For that triple, Clang seems to be calling into GCC driver > (/usr/bin/arm-none-eabi-gcc) for linking and GCC doesn't recognize > -fuse-ld=lld (supposedly -fuse-ld=gold selects ld.gold, -fuse-ld=bfd > selects ld.bfd and you would expect -fuse-lld=lld to select ld.lld, but it >

Sanjay: let me know if this is something that will apply to 3.9. Thanks, Hans On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 5:59 PM, Sanjay Patel via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Quick update - the bug existed before I refactored that chunk in > InstSimplify with: > https://reviews.llvm.org/rL275911 > > In fact, as discussed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D22537 - because we have a

...rt has a slightly more detailed repro, and was produced on Linux. The bug manifests if an xattr filter rule is being used; however the repro does not require actual xattrs to be present, so the bug can be reproduced even if the file system being used does not support xattrs. Prerequisites for the repros: - ssh service running on localhost - mkdir /tmp/{a,b} - touch /tmp/a/1 /tmp/b/{1,2} Repro #1, sender is local: $ rsync --filter='-x! user.*' -avvvHX --delete /tmp/a/. localhost:/tmp/b Result: - output: [Receiver] add_rule(-! user.*) - output: [generator] protecting file 2 because of patt...

Fri, 26 Jul 2019 08:26:01 -0700 (PDT) > syzbot has bisected this bug to: > > commit 0ecfebd2b52404ae0c54a878c872bb93363ada36 > Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds at linux-foundation.org> > Date: Sun Jul 7 22:41:56 2019 +0000 > > Linux 5.2 > > bisection log: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/bisect.txt?x=118810bfa00000 > start commit: 13bf6d6a Add