Displaying 20 results from an estimated 517 matches for "repros".
Did you mean:
repos
2006 Feb 21
0
OT Proftpd stopped authenication for users
For some reason proftpd stopped authentication for users. Anonymous
access still works but when someone tries to access the server via their
login it no longer authenticates them. I recently ran yum where proftpd
was updated (that said, I'm not sure that caused the problem). I
uninstalled the new version and and installed a prior version with no
change. Below is a look at my config, a
2006 Jul 18
1
Reproducible Research - Examples
All,
Recently I ran across a URL documenting published research using R:
http://www.cgd.ucar.edu/ccr/ammann/millennium/CODES_MBH.html
A note on the site indicates that the code is being revised. The code and
data are provided, so that one could reproduce the results without having to
buy a proprietary software program. In poking around the R website it is
clear that a lot of thought has gone
2020 Feb 26
2
Why is lldb telling me "variable not available"?
I haven't fully parsed this thread (sorry!), but I wanted to briefly mention that the SafeStack & ASan passes both do something similar (I think): move local variables backed by allocas onto a separate stack. These passes use replaceDbgDeclare to rewrite dbg.declares s.t. they point into the new stack. After that, llvm presumably runs LowerDbgDeclare (usually via InstCombine), but all the
2016 Jul 20
2
Hitting assertion failure related to vectorization + instcombine
Hi folks,
I'm hitting the below assertion failure when compiling this small piece of C code (repro.c, attached).
My command line is:
bin/clang --target=aarch64-linux-gnu -c -O2 repro.c
clang is built from top of trunk as of this morning. It only happens at -O2, and it doesn't happen with the default target (x86_64). I tried to reproduce using just 'llc -O2' but didn't
2020 Feb 26
2
Why is lldb telling me "variable not available"?
Hi Brian,
On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 7:43 PM Brian Gesiak <modocache at gmail.com> wrote:
> In other words, the value of %i is stored on the frame object, on the
> heap, at an offset of 7 into the frame. I'm beginning to think a
> fundamental fix for this issue would be to stop replacing
> llvm.dbg.declare with llvm.dbg.value, and instead replace the
> llvm.dbg.declare with
2024 Sep 27
1
Disabling S4 primitive dispatch during method resolution affects namespace load actions
>>>>> Ivan Krylov via R-devel
>>>>> on Fri, 27 Sep 2024 13:32:27 +0300 writes:
> Hello,
> This problem originally surfaced as an interaction between 'brms',
> 'rstan' and 'Rcpp' [1]: a call to dimnames() from the 'brms' package on
> an object of an S4 class owned by the 'rstan' package tried to
2024 Sep 27
1
Disabling S4 primitive dispatch during method resolution affects namespace load actions
Hello,
This problem originally surfaced as an interaction between 'brms',
'rstan' and 'Rcpp' [1]: a call to dimnames() from the 'brms' package on
an object of an S4 class owned by the 'rstan' package tried to load its
namespace. rstan:::.onLoad needs to load Rcpp modules, which uses load
actions and reference classes. Since methods:::.findInheritedMethods
2020 Feb 26
2
Why is lldb telling me "variable not available"?
Vedant, Jeremy,
Thanks a ton! I copied ASan's use of 'replaceDbgDeclare', think that worked!
https://github.com/modocache/llvm-project/commit/afbc04e1dcba has some
extremely quick and dirty changes I made (with no tests!), and a link
to a Gist with the LLVM IR and DWARF produced,
https://gist.github.com/modocache/6f29093ba2827946011b422ed3bd2903.
There's only one kink: the spot
2006 Jun 29
0
Problems with installing perl-Gtk2 from kbsingh repros
I need perl-Gtk2 for TinyCA2.
I find it on centos.karan.org
After many misteps, I add bout kbsingh-Centos-Extras.repro and
kbsingh-Centos-Misc.repro to /etc/yum.repro.d
I do a yum install perl-Glib and it finally goes, adding perl-ExtUtils
and warning me about user mockbuild does not exist.
Then I try install perl-Gtk2 and it fails:
yum install perl-Gtk2
Setting up Install Process
Setting
2013 Sep 19
2
[LLVMdev] llvm-ar does not generates symbol table for contained bitcode files
Hi,
The behavior of llvm-ar appears to have changed such that the archive symbol table no longer contains symbols contained within bitcode modules in the archive. This behavior appears to have been changed with revision 184083 when the internal implementation of llvm-ar was changed from lib/Archive/Archive.cpp to lib/object/Archive.cpp. This seems to occur because ObjectFile::createObjectFile()
2008 Aug 07
1
Firewire/IEEE1394 support on centos.plus repro and yum update
Helo,
I'm trying to update a centos server with a kernel form the centos.plus
repro because it contain Firewire/IEEE1394 support.
But when y do a :
# yum update
The kernel from the base is more recent thant the centos plus repro
I have tried with the
http://wiki.centos.org/PackageManagement/Yum/Priorities plug-in and it
didn't take the right kernel :
2013 Jun 03
0
Asterisk 11 + repro WebRTC tested
I've just done a test with a WebRTC client connecting to the repro proxy
with the SIP messages relayed over TCP to Asterisk
Asterisk successfully answers the call using SAVPF, SRTP and ICE.
The client is greeted by the demo
This was tested in the Asterisk 11 environment described in my earlier
email about SRTP build issues on the asterisk-users list.
This is quite useful because it proves
2019 Mar 25
2
INFO: task hung in vhost_net_stop_vq
Looks like more iotlb locking mess?
On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 10:21:00PM -0700, syzbot wrote:
> syzbot has bisected this bug to:
>
> commit 6b1e6cc7855b09a0a9bfa1d9f30172ba366f161c
> Author: Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com>
> Date: Thu Jun 23 06:04:32 2016 +0000
>
> vhost: new device IOTLB API
>
> bisection log:
2019 Mar 25
2
INFO: task hung in vhost_net_stop_vq
Looks like more iotlb locking mess?
On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 10:21:00PM -0700, syzbot wrote:
> syzbot has bisected this bug to:
>
> commit 6b1e6cc7855b09a0a9bfa1d9f30172ba366f161c
> Author: Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com>
> Date: Thu Jun 23 06:04:32 2016 +0000
>
> vhost: new device IOTLB API
>
> bisection log:
2016 Jul 20
2
Hitting assertion failure related to vectorization + instcombine
Thanks for notifying me. Yes, this was a recent change. Taking a look now.
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 1:49 PM, Michael Kuperstein <mkuper at google.com>
wrote:
> +Sanjay, who touched this last. :-)
>
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 12:44 PM, Ismail Badawi (ibadawi) via llvm-dev <
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> I'm hitting the
2019 Dec 02
2
llvm-9-dev apt package missing yaml-bench
Hello everyone
I was just porting a project to build against the LLVM 9 apt packages
and noticed that the issue I filed and explained during the release
phase in https://llvm.org/PR43035 still persists:
CMake Error at /usr/lib/llvm-9/lib/cmake/llvm/LLVMExports.cmake:1323
(message):
The imported target "yaml-bench" references the file
"/usr/lib/llvm-9/bin/yaml-bench"
2011 Nov 02
0
[LLVMdev] weak_odr constant versus weak_odr global
Hi
[Adding cfe-dev to widen the net]
On Tue, November 1, 2011 23:19, Richard Smith wrote:
> We recently narrowed down a clang regression to the following testcase:
>
> struct S { static const int x; };
> template<typename T> struct U { static const int k; };
> template<typename T> const int U<T>::k = T::x;
>
> #ifdef TU1
> extern int f();
> const int
2011 Nov 01
6
[LLVMdev] weak_odr constant versus weak_odr global
Hi,
We recently narrowed down a clang regression to the following testcase:
struct S {
static const int x;
};
template<typename T> struct U {
static const int k;
};
template<typename T> const int U<T>::k = T::x;
#ifdef TU1
extern int f();
const int S::x = 42;
int main() {
return f() + U<S>::k;
}
#endif
#ifdef TU2
int f() { return U<S>::k; }
#endif
/* Steps
2017 Feb 26
3
Problems using Clang with LLD on embedded ARM
Hi Sean
On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 5:10 AM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> For that triple, Clang seems to be calling into GCC driver
> (/usr/bin/arm-none-eabi-gcc) for linking and GCC doesn't recognize
> -fuse-ld=lld (supposedly -fuse-ld=gold selects ld.gold, -fuse-ld=bfd
> selects ld.bfd and you would expect -fuse-lld=lld to select ld.lld, but it
>
2016 Jul 22
2
Hitting assertion failure related to vectorization + instcombine
Sanjay: let me know if this is something that will apply to 3.9.
Thanks,
Hans
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 5:59 PM, Sanjay Patel via llvm-dev
<llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Quick update - the bug existed before I refactored that chunk in
> InstSimplify with:
> https://reviews.llvm.org/rL275911
>
> In fact, as discussed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D22537 - because we have a