search for: represnts

Hi all I'm writing a direct llvm backend for gcjx a new java fronted for gcc. I'm now ready to tackle creating the structures to represnt classes I read the gcc 4.0 patches and it seems that the llvm struct is padded and aligned using the info from the gcc tree. In my case I don't have this information. I'm willing to intially let llvm align and pad the struct but its not clear

Hi, I am trying to run PCA on a set of data with dimension 115*300,000. The columns represnt the snps and the row represent the individuals. so this is what i did. #load the data code<-read.table("code.txt", sep='\t', header=F, nrows=300000) # do PCA # pr<-prcomp(code, retx=T, center=T) I am getting the following error message "Error: cannot allocate vector of

On Tue, 20 Dec 2005, Mike Emmel wrote: > Hi all I'm writing a direct llvm backend for gcjx a new java fronted for gcc. Great! > I'm now ready to tackle creating the structures to represnt classes I > read the gcc 4.0 patches and it seems that the llvm struct is padded > and aligned using the info from the gcc tree. Yes. > In my case I don't have this information.

...rameters are represented as const Expressions in llvm.Everytime we come across Y<T>::dim a new Expression pointer is created which is used to represent the Arg of X<Y<T>::dim> . Since every time Y<T>::dim is a new Expression pointer Arg for template X<Y<T>::dim> represnts a diffenent typeOrValue each time.As a result for the same expression X<Y<T>::dim> we create a new type node in getCanonicalTemplateSpecializationType resulting in type mismatch. Wanted to know if this current approach to create a new expression pointer every time the same expression is...

On Sep 11, 2009, at 3:31 PM, David Greene wrote: > Attached is a patch to print asm comments for spill information. > We've discussed the mechanisms before but I wanted to run the > patch by everyone before I start to commit pieces. Some thoughts: The general approach to enhancing CreateStackObject and adding MachineInstr::AsmPrinterFlags seems fine to me! The testcase should

Hi all, I have a 16 bit image (TIFF) and i want to analyse the pixels distribution. So, i obtain a matrix which values are between 0 and 2^16 -1. Now i would like to represnt this image with the fucntions rgb() and image(). I am not sure , but i think that only 256 colors are available. So is there a solution to represent all the palette of the colors or i have to limit the representations with

...the format given at the end. Ta ans Sa are the names of certain cities. there are 69 cities in my data. column 1 is representing station name (i am writing the data of only two cities for simplicity but actually, as i wrote, i have 69 cities and the actuall table runs down very deep.) Column 2 represnts the year for which the data is given (Actuall data for each station is of different length but atleast of 24 years). Column 3 and 4 reprent the month and the day of the data. obviously each year has 12 months and each month as different number of days, but to make table easily understable only 3...

Attached is a patch to print asm comments for spill information. We've discussed the mechanisms before but I wanted to run the patch by everyone before I start to commit pieces. -Dave -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: spillcomments.patch Type: text/x-diff Size: 58930 bytes Desc: not available URL:

i a have transformed my data to data frame named df with only column names(no rownames).each column represnt one sample with 3 observations (in deed nrow(df)=3, and ncol(df)=92).in order to check homoskedasticity of variance of my 92 samples i do: bartlett.test(df) it work and give me a result.but i'm afread of getting false result,knowen that a call of such function require a vector of data

..., it should. > 2) Non type template parameters are represented as const Expressions in llvm.Everytime we come across Y::dim a new Expression pointer is created which is used to represent the Arg of X::dim> . Since every time Y::dim is a new Expression pointer > Arg for template X::dim> represnts a diffenent typeOrValue each time.As a result for the same expression X::dim> we create a new type node in getCanonicalTemplateSpecializationType resulting in type mismatch. Wanted to know if this current approach to create a new expression pointer every time the same expression is revisited aga...

On 12/20/05, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > On Tue, 20 Dec 2005, Mike Emmel wrote: > > Hi all I'm writing a direct llvm backend for gcjx a new java fronted for gcc. > > Great! > > > I'm now ready to tackle creating the structures to represnt classes I > > read the gcc 4.0 patches and it seems that the llvm struct is padded > > and

Dear List, I ran into some trouble by calculating differences. For me it is important that differences are either 0 or not. So I don't understand the outcome of this calculation 865.56-(782.86+0+63.85+18.85+0) [1] -1.136868e-13 I run R version 2.71 on WinXP I could solve my problem by using round() but I would like to know the reason. Maybe someone can help me? Thanx

In the recent muppets christmas film, god (played by whoopi goldberg- or howevr u spell her name), mentioned converting her entire album collection (every album ever recorded. ever) to mp3 files. Now that is the most pointless use of advertising the inferior mp3 format i've ever seen. Now that we've started covering the use of vorbis in games, anyone spotted any reference (no matter how

plain text document attachment (hvvm.patch) OK, some explaination is needed here. The goal of lguest with paravirt ops, is to have one kernel that can be loaded both as a host and a guest. To do this, we need to map an area in virtual memory that both the host and guest share. But I don't want any conflicts with the guest. One solution is just to do a single area for boot up, and then use the

plain text document attachment (hvvm.patch) OK, some explaination is needed here. The goal of lguest with paravirt ops, is to have one kernel that can be loaded both as a host and a guest. To do this, we need to map an area in virtual memory that both the host and guest share. But I don't want any conflicts with the guest. One solution is just to do a single area for boot up, and then use the