search for: reprents

Hello I have around 200 PDF-documents, containing data i want organized in R as a dataframe. The PDF-documents look like this; http://www.nabble.com/file/p21667074/PRRS-billede%2Bmed%2Bfarver.jpeg or like this; http://www.nabble.com/file/p21667074/PRRS-billede%2Bmed%2Bfarver%2B2.jpeg So i want to pull out the data in coloured boxes it become organized like this (just in R instead of

Dear R users. I am little lost and i need your help. I have such data. DATE i Symptomes t 1 2009-04-24 Mexique 0 14358 2 2009-04-24 usa 0 14358 3 2009-04-26 Mexique 18 14360 4 2009-04-26 usa 100 14360 5 2009-04-27 Canada 6 14361 6 2009-04-27

...deduced flags)? It seems like this problem is solvable within SCEV. > > -Hal I think you would have to track all the uses of each expression... You can turn SCEV into an IR and inherit all the representational problems inherent in llvm IR. Or you can use it as an analysis that efficiently reprents only the mathematical properties of an expression and is simple to work with. I think it's fantastic as an analysis but really stinks at being an IR. -Andy -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/2...

I want to know the type of pointer . for example if we have int *p, struct node *w char *q then i want int for p,char for q , struct node for w. any help would be appreciated. -- View this message in context: http://llvm.1065342.n5.nabble.com/How-To-Get-The-Name-of-the-type-the-popinter-is-pointing-to-tp49121.html Sent from the LLVM - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Dear R users, [in case the format of email is changed or you dont finf it easy to understand, i have attached a text file of my question] i have the data in the following format and i want to convert it in the format given at the end. Ta ans Sa are the names of certain cities. there are 69 cities in my data. column 1 is representing station name (i am writing the data of only two cities for

----- Original Message ----- > > > > > On Jun 24, 2013, at 11:01 AM, Arnold Schwaighofer < > aschwaighofer at apple.com > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > I wanted to start a discussion about the following issue since I am > not sure about what to do about it: > > The loop-vectorizer has the potential to make code a quite a bit > bigger (esp. in

...ks). Combined with some caching of subsequent flags for derived expressions I think this may even be not too expensive. > > > > You can turn SCEV into an IR and inherit all the representational > problems inherent in llvm IR. Or you can use it as an analysis that > efficiently reprents only the mathematical properties of an > expression and is simple to work with. I think it's fantastic as an > analysis but really stinks at being an IR. Agreed. Unfortunately, we do need to keep track of wrapping properties in order to generate correct code in all cases (assuming we don...

Dear, Thanks for the previous tips about 'its' for importing the following data. 5/10/1998,7 5/11/1998,5 5/12/1998,2 5/14/1998,1 5/15/1998,1 5/19/1998,1 5/20/1998,1 1. When using the following command; test<-readcsvIts('Fires98.csv',informat=its.format("%m/%d/%Y"),header=FA LSE) the function reads in the data from the csv file as; V2 05/10/1998 7

Hey, all. I'm looking for packages that are good at two things 1) Drawing directed graphs (i.e nodes and edges), both with single and double headed arrows, as well as allowing for differences in line width and solid versus dashed. Note: I've tried Rgraphviz here, but have run into some problems (which seem fixable and I may go with it in the end), and it doesn't satisfy need

...y need to preserve it across passes? Invalidation is a nasty problem. We already have issues with SCEVUnknown invalidation. >> You can turn SCEV into an IR and inherit all the representational >> problems inherent in llvm IR. Or you can use it as an analysis that >> efficiently reprents only the mathematical properties of an >> expression and is simple to work with. I think it's fantastic as an >> analysis but really stinks at being an IR. > > Agreed. Unfortunately, we do need to keep track of wrapping properties in order to generate correct code in all case...