Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "repositsories".
Did you mean:
repositories
2015 Apr 21
2
Samba 4.1 as member server, problems doing password authentication using CentOS/RedHat 7 packages
...> With Samba 4, I've found the output of "samba-tool testparm" to be different
> from "testparm". The former looks more trustworthy to me.
I feel really foolish here -- but I don't see samba-tool as an installed
binary or in any of the packages available via the repositsories we use
for CentOS or Fedora. Is this part of the standard suite or samba
> Following smb.conf compare, I would compare krb5.conf, particularly the realm
> name and capitalization.
> Been bitten by that >.<
>
>
Good thought. I use 'net ads join' to join the active di...
2015 Apr 21
0
Samba 4.1 as member server, problems doing password authentication using CentOS/RedHat 7 packages
...the output of "samba-tool testparm" to be
>> different
>> from "testparm". The former looks more trustworthy to me.
>
> I feel really foolish here -- but I don't see samba-tool as an
> installed binary or in any of the packages available via the
> repositsories we use for CentOS or Fedora. Is this part of the
> standard suite or samba
You will not get samba-tool on any red-hat distro, you cannot set up a
samba AD DC on red-hat with distro packages because they want to use MIT
kerberos.
>
>> Following smb.conf compare, I would compare krb5...
2015 Apr 20
2
Samba 4.1 as member server, problems doing password authentication using CentOS/RedHat 7 packages
I've come across a difference I can't explain between the way Samba
behaves on Fedora 20 (4.1.17-1.fc20) and Centos 7 (4.1.12-21.el7). I
have a test server of each system (Fedora 20 and Centos 7), each newly
built, fully updated, and with the same config file. Each is joined to
our AD domain (Windows DCs). Some of our client systems are joined to
the domain and use Kerberos tickets
2015 Apr 23
2
Samba 4.1 as member server, problems doing password authentication using CentOS/RedHat 7 packages
...samba-tool testparm" to be
>>> different
>>> from "testparm". The former looks more trustworthy to me.
>>
>> I feel really foolish here -- but I don't see samba-tool as an
>> installed binary or in any of the packages available via the
>> repositsories we use for CentOS or Fedora. Is this part of the
>> standard suite or samba
>
> You will not get samba-tool on any red-hat distro, you cannot set up a
> samba AD DC on red-hat with distro packages because they want to use
> MIT kerberos.
>
Aha, thanks. I don't want to set...