Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "repolog".
Did you mean:
replog
2019 Jul 04
2
Re: [PATCH libnbd 0/2] Two patches to make libnbd work on FreeBSD.
...es if you want to compile on FreeBSD:
> >
> >- OCaml is too old to run the generator, so you can't easily build
> > from git. Tarball builds should work, or you can copy the
> > generated files across from a Linux machine.
> >
>
> Are you sure? I checked repology.org and it says the FreeBSD Ports have 4.05.0,
> which I managed to make work by a simple patch some time ago. I'm setting up a
> FreeBSD machine to try it out.
Probably because I'm not running the latest FreeBSD. I think I was
using 11.2.
Rich.
> >- Running the tests is d...
2019 Jul 04
1
Re: [PATCH libnbd 0/2] Two patches to make libnbd work on FreeBSD.
...> >>>- OCaml is too old to run the generator, so you can't easily build
> >>> from git. Tarball builds should work, or you can copy the
> >>> generated files across from a Linux machine.
> >>>
> >>
> >>Are you sure? I checked repology.org and it says the FreeBSD Ports have 4.05.0,
> >>which I managed to make work by a simple patch some time ago. I'm setting up a
> >>FreeBSD machine to try it out.
> >
> >Probably because I'm not running the latest FreeBSD. I think I was
> >using 11.2...
2023 Aug 11
2
[libnbd PATCH] golang: Bump minimum Go version to 1.17
Go 1.17 or newer is required to use unsafe.Slice(), which in turn
allows us to write a simpler conversion from a C array to a Go object
during callbacks.
To check if this makes sense, look at
https://repology.org/project/go/versions compared to our list in
ci/manifest.yml, at the time I made this commit:
Alpine 3.15: 1.17.10
AlmaLinux 8: 1.19.10
CentOS Stream 8: 1.20.4
Debian 10: 1.11.6
Debian 11: 1.15.15 (mainline), 1.19.8 (backports)
Debian 12: 1.19.8
Fedoar 36: 1.19.8
FreeBSD Ports: 1.20.7
OpenSUSE...
2019 Jul 04
0
Re: [PATCH libnbd 0/2] Two patches to make libnbd work on FreeBSD.
...ke more sense.
>
>Some notes if you want to compile on FreeBSD:
>
> - OCaml is too old to run the generator, so you can't easily build
> from git. Tarball builds should work, or you can copy the
> generated files across from a Linux machine.
>
Are you sure? I checked repology.org and it says the FreeBSD Ports have 4.05.0,
which I managed to make work by a simple patch some time ago. I'm setting up a
FreeBSD machine to try it out.
> - Running the tests is difficult because there is no nbdkit package
> for FreeBSD. With a local build of nbdkit you can play...
2019 Jul 03
6
[PATCH libnbd 0/2] Two patches to make libnbd work on FreeBSD.
Two simple patches which make libnbd compile on FreeBSD.
Are we OK to copy common/include/byte-swapping.h from nbdkit? There
is no license issue that I know of. Should we put it in lib/ or
create a common/ directory? The header file is actually also needed
by the tests (follow up patch for that) so putting it in common/ might
make more sense.
Some notes if you want to compile on FreeBSD:
-
2019 Jul 04
0
Re: [PATCH libnbd 0/2] Two patches to make libnbd work on FreeBSD.
...n FreeBSD:
>> >
>> >- OCaml is too old to run the generator, so you can't easily build
>> > from git. Tarball builds should work, or you can copy the
>> > generated files across from a Linux machine.
>> >
>>
>> Are you sure? I checked repology.org and it says the FreeBSD Ports have 4.05.0,
>> which I managed to make work by a simple patch some time ago. I'm setting up a
>> FreeBSD machine to try it out.
>
>Probably because I'm not running the latest FreeBSD. I think I was
>using 11.2.
>
The Ports shoul...