search for: reply_nt1

...a remota Nov 20 16:09:32 dell01 smbd[5787]: [2007/11/20 16:09:32, 0] lib/util_sock.c:send_smb(765) Nov 20 16:09:32 dell01 smbd[5787]: Error writing 5 bytes to client. -1. (Conexi?n reinicializada por la m?quina remota) Nov 20 16:24:37 dell01 smbd[6199]: [2007/11/20 16:24:37, 0] smbd/negprot.c:reply_nt1(316) Nov 20 16:24:37 dell01 smbd[6199]: reply_nt1: smb signing is incompatible with share level security ! Nov 20 16:24:37 dell01 smbd[6200]: [2007/11/20 16:24:37, 0] smbd/negprot.c:reply_nt1(316) Nov 20 16:24:37 dell01 smbd[6200]: reply_nt1: smb signing is incompatible with share level secu...

Hai, Im wondering here.. If the client is a windows 10 pc connecting, > ../source3/smbd/negprot.c:419(reply_nt1) using SPNEGO > ../source3/smbd/negprot.c:761(reply_negprot) Selected protocol NT LM 0.12 > ../source3/smbd/process.c:554(receive_smb_talloc) > receive_smb_raw_talloc failed for client > ipv4:10.55.66.82:59271 read error = NT_STATUS_CONNECTION_RESET. And i see this.. Then why...

...age(1361) switch message SMBnegprot (pid 4445) conn 0x0 [2009/08/16 00:58:17, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(324) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2009/08/16 00:58:17, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(568) Requested protocol [NT LM 0.12] [2009/08/16 00:58:17, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_nt1(392) using SPNEGO [2009/08/16 00:58:17, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(673) Selected protocol NT LM 0.12 [2009/08/16 00:58:17, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(1549) Transaction 1 of length 1358 (0 toread) [2009/08/16 00:58:17, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(1361) switch message SMBsesss...

...messages. [2013/05/22 16:34:24.527444, 3] smbd/oplock_linux.c:239(linux_init_kernel_oplocks) Linux kernel oplocks enabled [2013/05/22 16:34:24.528174, 3] smbd/server_exit.c:181(exit_server_common) Server exit (failed to receive smb request) [2013/05/22 16:34:24.529338, 3] smbd/negprot.c:419(reply_nt1) using SPNEGO [2013/05/22 16:34:24.529657, 3] smbd/negprot.c:704(reply_negprot) Selected protocol NT LM 0.12 [2013/05/22 16:34:28.192202, 3] smbd/process.c:1609(process_smb) Transaction 1 of length 190 (0 toread) [2013/05/22 16:34:28.192829, 3] smbd/process.c:1414(switch_message) switch...

...eply_negprot) Requested protocol [LM1.2X002] [2011/03/14 08:59:43.275448, 3] smbd/negprot.c:586(reply_negprot) Requested protocol [LANMAN2.1] [2011/03/14 08:59:43.275502, 3] smbd/negprot.c:586(reply_negprot) Requested protocol [NT LM 0.12] [2011/03/14 08:59:43.277374, 3] smbd/negprot.c:404(reply_nt1) using SPNEGO [2011/03/14 08:59:43.277771, 3] smbd/negprot.c:691(reply_negprot) Selected protocol NT LM 0.12 [2011/03/14 08:59:43.340273, 3] smbd/oplock.c:895(init_oplocks) init_oplocks: initializing messages. [2011/03/14 08:59:43.344909, 3] smbd/oplock_linux.c:224(linux_init_kernel_oplock...

...Samba server. It seems to work rarely and non-deterministically! When it fails, it seems that either the client or the server is attempting to authenticate me using WIN.DOC.IC.AC.UK alone, which Samba barfs over. (IP addresses / real hostnames redacted.) [2005/10/31 11:18:40, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_nt1(337) using SPNEGO [2005/10/31 11:18:40, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(559) Selected protocol NT LM 0.12 [2005/10/31 11:18:40, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(1114) Transaction 1 of length 240 [2005/10/31 11:18:40, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(900) switch message SMBsesssetupX (pid 2...

...:26, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(487) Requested protocol [LM1.2X002] [2007/08/20 13:19:26, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(487) Requested protocol [LANMAN2.1] [2007/08/20 13:19:26, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(487) Requested protocol [NT LM 0.12] [2007/08/20 13:19:26, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_nt1(357) using SPNEGO [2007/08/20 13:19:26, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(580) Selected protocol NT LM 0.12 [2007/08/20 13:19:26, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(1110) Transaction 1 of length 282 [2007/08/20 13:19:26, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(914) switch message SMBsesssetupX (pid 30689...

On 21/04/19 17:12, Rowland Penny wrote: > On Sun, 21 Apr 2019 08:59:01 +0930 > Stephen Davies via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> I have been a bit divorced from Samba for a while and am stumped by a >> recently seen issue. >> >> My Samba server (V4.8.3) is Centos 7 and the remote clients are >> windoze boxes at the other end of a VPN

...:35, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(439) Requested protocol [LM1.2X002] [2003/06/08 20:49:35, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(439) Requested protocol [LANMAN2.1] [2003/06/08 20:49:35, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(439) Requested protocol [NT LM 0.12] [2003/06/08 20:49:35, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_nt1(307) not using SPNEGO [2003/06/08 20:49:35, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(516) Selected protocol NT LM 0.12 [2003/06/08 20:49:35, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(882) Transaction 2 of length 270 [2003/06/08 20:49:35, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(676) switch message SMBsesssetupX (pid 93...

...k rarely and non-deterministically! When it fails, it seems > that either the client or the server is attempting to authenticate me using > WIN.DOC.IC.AC.UK alone, which Samba barfs over. > > (IP addresses / real hostnames redacted.) > > [2005/10/31 11:18:40, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_nt1(337) > using SPNEGO > [2005/10/31 11:18:40, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(559) > Selected protocol NT LM 0.12 > [2005/10/31 11:18:40, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(1114) > Transaction 1 of length 240 > [2005/10/31 11:18:40, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(900) > switc...

...sage) switch message SMBnegprot (pid 5658) conn 0x0 [2010/02/20 00:56:16, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:310(set_sec_ctx) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2010/02/20 00:56:16, 3] smbd/negprot.c:567(reply_negprot) Requested protocol [NT LM 0.12] [2010/02/20 00:56:16, 3] smbd/negprot.c:387(reply_nt1) using SPNEGO [2010/02/20 00:56:16, 3] smbd/negprot.c:672(reply_negprot) Selected protocol NT LM 0.12 [2010/02/20 00:56:18, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:310(set_sec_ctx) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2010/02/20 00:56:18, 3] smbd/connection.c:31(yield_connection) Yielding connectio...

...5:42, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(505) Requested protocol [DOS LANMAN2.1] [2010/08/27 13:35:42, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(505) Requested protocol [LANMAN2.1] [2010/08/27 13:35:42, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(505) Requested protocol [Samba] [2010/08/27 13:35:42, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_nt1(364) using SPNEGO [2010/08/27 13:35:42, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(606) Selected protocol NT LANMAN 1.0 Here it will wait for sometime before printing out the rest. [2010/08/27 13:36:42, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(241) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2010/08/27 13:37...

...eply_negprot) Requested protocol [LM1.2X002] [2012/12/30 18:34:26.949790, 3] smbd/negprot.c:598(reply_negprot) Requested protocol [LANMAN2.1] [2012/12/30 18:34:26.949876, 3] smbd/negprot.c:598(reply_negprot) Requested protocol [NT LM 0.12] [2012/12/30 18:34:26.950208, 3] smbd/negprot.c:419(reply_nt1) using SPNEGO [2012/12/30 18:34:26.950346, 3] smbd/negprot.c:704(reply_negprot) Selected protocol NT LM 0.12 [2012/12/30 18:34:26.951533, 3] smbd/process.c:1662(process_smb) Transaction 1 of length 1376 (0 toread) [2012/12/30 18:34:26.951682, 3] smbd/process.c:1467(switch_message) switch...

...gt; On Wed, 24 Apr 2019 11:38:58 +0200 > "L.P.H. van Belle via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > Hai, > > > > > > Im wondering here.. If the client is a windows 10 pc connecting, > > > > > ../source3/smbd/negprot.c:419(reply_nt1) using SPNEGO > > > ../source3/smbd/negprot.c:761(reply_negprot) Selected protocol NT > > > LM 0.12 ../source3/smbd/process.c:554(receive_smb_talloc) > > > receive_smb_raw_talloc failed for client > > > ipv4:10.55.66.82:59271 read error = NT_STATUS_CONNEC...

...] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(486) Requested protocol [LM1.2X002] [2006/06/26 08:29:18, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(486) Requested protocol [LANMAN2.1] [2006/06/26 08:29:18, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(486) Requested protocol [NT LM 0.12] [2006/06/26 08:29:18, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_nt1(357) using SPNEGO [2006/06/26 08:29:18, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(579) Selected protocol NT LM 0.12 [2006/06/26 08:29:18, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(1194) Transaction 1 of length 240 [2006/06/26 08:29:18, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(993) switch message SMBsesssetupX (pi...

...8:38, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(487) Requested protocol [LM1.2X002] [2007/01/30 16:48:38, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(487) Requested protocol [DOS LANMAN2.1] [2007/01/30 16:48:38, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(487) Requested protocol [Samba] [2007/01/30 16:48:38, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_nt1(357) using SPNEGO [2007/01/30 16:48:38, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(580) Selected protocol NT LANMAN 1.0 [2007/01/30 16:48:38, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(1110) Transaction 1 of length 183 [2007/01/30 16:48:38, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(914) switch message SMBnegprot (pid 12385...

...eply_negprot) Requested protocol [LM1.2X002] [2013/01/10 21:40:56.446091, 3] smbd/negprot.c:587(reply_negprot) Requested protocol [LANMAN2.1] [2013/01/10 21:40:56.446098, 3] smbd/negprot.c:587(reply_negprot) Requested protocol [NT LM 0.12] [2013/01/10 21:40:56.446174, 3] smbd/negprot.c:405(reply_nt1) using SPNEGO [2013/01/10 21:40:56.446190, 3] smbd/negprot.c:692(reply_negprot) Selected protocol NT LM 0.12 [2013/01/10 21:40:56.590285, 3] smbd/process.c:1485(process_smb) Transaction 1 of length 142 (0 toread) [2013/01/10 21:40:56.590309, 3] smbd/process.c:1294(switch_message) switch...

...3] smbd/negprot.c:567(reply_negprot) Requested protocol [NT LM 0.12] [2010/02/25 11:23:41, 3] smbd/negprot.c:567(reply_negprot) Requested protocol [SMB 2.002] [2010/02/25 11:23:41, 3] smbd/negprot.c:567(reply_negprot) Requested protocol [SMB 2.???] [2010/02/25 11:23:41, 3] smbd/negprot.c:387(reply_nt1) using SPNEGO [2010/02/25 11:23:41, 3] smbd/negprot.c:672(reply_negprot) Selected protocol NT LM 0.12 [2010/02/25 11:23:41, 3] smbd/process.c:1459(process_smb) Transaction 1 of length 142 (0 toread) [2010/02/25 11:23:41, 3] smbd/process.c:1273(switch_message) switch message SMBsesssetupX (pi...

...:27, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(475) Requested protocol [LM1.2X002] [2006/01/20 15:22:27, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(475) Requested protocol [LANMAN2.1] [2006/01/20 15:22:27, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(475) Requested protocol [NT LM 0.12] [2006/01/20 15:22:27, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_nt1(346) using SPNEGO [2006/01/20 15:22:27, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(568) Selected protocol NT LM 0.12 [2006/01/20 15:22:29, 3] smbd/process.c:timeout_processing(1447) timeout_processing: End of file from client (client has disconnected). -- Happy Landings, Jon Detert IT Systems Administ...

...eply_negprot) Requested protocol [LM1.2X002] [2010/08/25 21:34:25.081719, 3] smbd/negprot.c:586(reply_negprot) Requested protocol [LANMAN2.1] [2010/08/25 21:34:25.081788, 3] smbd/negprot.c:586(reply_negprot) Requested protocol [NT LM 0.12] [2010/08/25 21:34:25.082252, 3] smbd/negprot.c:404(reply_nt1) using SPNEGO [2010/08/25 21:34:25.082344, 3] smbd/negprot.c:691(reply_negprot) Selected protocol NT LM 0.12