search for: replictions

Hai mathias, You welkom, always happy to help out and nice too hear you got it working. I must ask.. Did you reboot the servers after you added the second server to the DNS? And especialy in order, DC_with_FSMO, wait until its up again, then DC2. This often fixes the repliction problem and as far as i know, this only happend just after the install of a extra DC. Greetz, Louis

No replication this morning but FSMO was rebooted yesterday. Only joined DC were rebooted. After verifying all A records related to new DC were created, I forced creation of replication related DNS entries as described there : https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Check_and_fix_DNS_entries_on_DC_joins#Resolve_the_objectGUID_CNAME_record_of_the_new_joined_Domain_Controller I forced replication (drs

We have a setup with ldap and sql passdbs and sql userdb, from my understanding of the documentation dsync repliction picks up the users to replicate via the iterate query. This query returns 646 users in sql (not everyone gets replicated) but when i run a doveadm replicator status Total number of known users 92236 seriously that kinda lot more than 646 Does iterate_query belong in user_db or

Hai Louis, I should be able to answer you tomorrow: I pushed installation of 10 DC before leaving work and this process would not be able to use workaround described earlier because of SSH not yet open between the two sites. I expect all other needed ports to be open, so I expect only the replication workaround to be failed this night. So tomorrow I should arrive at work with 10 DC joined to my

Dear all I have the following data (a shortened extract shown; some replictates of time deleted) to which I fitted the linear model given below: time group mass 11 control 0.019 11 control 0.014 14 control 0.0306 14 control 0.0289 14 control 0.0236 17 control 0.0469 17 control 0.0709 11 five 0.0077 11 five

...7 and 53 times with ar=0.7, 0.5 and 0.2 > respectively. (sigma was assumed known in calculating the statistic test and > the nominal significance level is 0.05) > > That is, the LRT seems to become somewhat anti-conservative when the ar > parameter increases. > I am aware the 1000 replictions are few to assess the size, but the "trend" > in the sizes seems noticeable. Am I wrong? > Am I missing some theoretical issues or could it depend on any computational > apect related to the the arima() function? > > Any comment is coming? > Many thanks > best, >...

I have 3 Samba PDC servers with OpenLDAP backends, all at different locations. The replication to the 2 consumers works fine when the consumer's slapd is recently restarted, but if changes in the LDAP database occur later on, the consumers do not pick up this update. Again, restarting slapd on the consumers pulls in the update. Also, updates done shortly afterwards (say a couple of minutes)

Hi all, I would like to be able to rely on samba given tools to manage my DNS entries but until now, I failed. >From what I have understood there is one and only one tool responsible to update DNS: samba_dnsupdate. Is that previous affirmation true? I had issue with DNS backend set to internal DNS server: samba_dnsupdate was almost never working. So I switched to Bind-DLZ as advised here