search for: replaygain_track_gain

...ear all my music without any difference in volume. But it seems that all players I use ignore the gain value stored in my flac files. All flacs are louder than the gained mp3s I have. $ metaflac --show-tag=REPLAYGAIN_ALBUM_GAIN <some>.flac REPLAYGAIN_ALBUM_GAIN=-9.96 dB $ metaflac --show-tag=REPLAYGAIN_TRACK_GAIN <some>.flac REPLAYGAIN_TRACK_GAIN=-9.96 dB The flacs are always louder played as the mp3s and this happens with all players I have: mplayer, amarok (using either gestreamer or xine engine) and even with mpg123 and flac123. The mp3s are simply gained with mp3gain (http://mp3gain.sourceforge....

...e maximum of those of the tracks. By the way, i guess the REPLAY_GAIN_TRACK is the gain required to reach the REFERENCE_LOUDNESS. # flac --replay-gain *.wav # for f in *.flac; do echo "\n$f"; metaflac --export-tags-to= - $f; done e512100f_00.flac REPLAYGAIN_REFERENCE_LOUDNESS=89.0 dB REPLAYGAIN_TRACK_GAIN=-8.58 dB REPLAYGAIN_TRACK_PEAK=0.99996948 REPLAYGAIN_ALBUM_GAIN=-8.31 dB REPLAYGAIN_ALBUM_PEAK=0.99996948 e512100f_01.flac REPLAYGAIN_REFERENCE_LOUDNESS=89.0 dB REPLAYGAIN_TRACK_GAIN=-8.62 dB REPLAYGAIN_TRACK_PEAK=0.99996948 REPLAYGAIN_ALBUM_GAIN=-8.31 dB REPLAYGAIN_ALBUM_PEAK=0.99996948 e512100f...

..."REPLAYGAIN_ALBUM_*" values are supposed to be the maximum (or minimum) of the REPLAYGAIN_TRACK_* values over all tracks. # flac --replay-gain *.wav # for f in *.flac; do echo "\n$f"; metaflac --export-tags-to= - $f; done e512100f_00.flac REPLAYGAIN_REFERENCE_LOUDNESS=89.0 dB REPLAYGAIN_TRACK_GAIN=-8.58 dB REPLAYGAIN_TRACK_PEAK=0.99996948 REPLAYGAIN_ALBUM_GAIN=-8.31 dB REPLAYGAIN_ALBUM_PEAK=0.99996948 e512100f_01.flac REPLAYGAIN_REFERENCE_LOUDNESS=89.0 dB REPLAYGAIN_TRACK_GAIN=-8.62 dB REPLAYGAIN_TRACK_PEAK=0.99996948 REPLAYGAIN_ALBUM_GAIN=-8.31 dB REPLAYGAIN_ALBUM_PEAK=0.99996948 e512100f...

Copy additional filter values from Foobar2000 as found in <http://code.google.com/p/sirens2/source/browse/trunk/libwavpack-4.32.psp/wvgain.c?r=32> to allow metaflac to perform gain analysis on high sample rate audio. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/attachments/20120107/018c821b/attachment-0001.htm

...t; test case61: --import-picture-from... OK > test case62: --import-picture-from... OK > Testing FLAC file with unknown metadata... OK > Testing FLAC replaygain 8000 (8000 x 1) ... awk: line 29: function > lshift never defined > ERROR, Expected -12.73 db instead of comment[1]: > REPLAYGAIN_TRACK_GAIN=-24601.00 dB > OK > [...] > Testing FLAC replaygain 192000 (48000 x 4) ... awk: line 29: function > lshift never defined > ERROR, Expected -14.16 db instead of comment[1]: > REPLAYGAIN_TRACK_GAIN=-24601.00 dB > OK > [...] I don't know why, but the test continues and s...

...8800596 MD5 signature: 9e471211972413ceb8febcdc77ef9d68 METADATA block #1 type: 4 (VORBIS_COMMENT) is last: false length: 439 vendor string: Lavf57.83.100 comments: 14 comment[0]: REPLAYGAIN_ALGORITHM=ITU-R BS.1770 comment[1]: REPLAYGAIN_REFERENCE_LOUDNESS=-18.00 comment[2]: REPLAYGAIN_TRACK_GAIN=8.53 dB comment[3]: REPLAYGAIN_TRACK_PEAK=0.218024 comment[4]: REPLAYGAIN_ALBUM_GAIN=-0.03 dB comment[5]: REPLAYGAIN_ALBUM_PEAK=0.695334 comment[6]: encoder=Lavf57.83.100 comment[7]: ARTIST=Hirilorn comment[8]: TITLE=Return of the Druids comment[9]: TRACKNUMBER=01 co...

...th: 18 seek points: 1 point 0: sample_number=0, stream_offset=0, frame_samples=4096 METADATA block #2 type: 4 (VORBIS_COMMENT) is last: false length: 223 vendor string: reference libFLAC 1.2.0 20070715 comments: 5 comment[0]: REPLAYGAIN_REFERENCE_LOUDNESS=89.0 dB comment[1]: REPLAYGAIN_TRACK_GAIN=-12.88 dB comment[2]: REPLAYGAIN_TRACK_PEAK=1.00000000 comment[3]: REPLAYGAIN_ALBUM_GAIN=-12.88 dB comment[4]: REPLAYGAIN_ALBUM_PEAK=1.00000000 METADATA block #3 type: 1 (PADDING) is last: true length: 7 $ Regards, Scott

...er=30718718, stream_offset=0, frame_samples=0 point 70: sample_number=31163917, stream_offset=0, frame_samples=0 METADATA block #2 type: 4 (VORBIS_COMMENT) is last: false length: 296 vendor string: reference libFLAC 1.1.0 20030126 comments: 9 comment[0]: REPLAYGAIN_TRACK_PEAK=0.89843750 comment[1]: REPLAYGAIN_TRACK_GAIN=-5.67 dB comment[2]: REPLAYGAIN_ALBUM_PEAK=0.89843750 comment[3]: REPLAYGAIN_ALBUM_GAIN=-5.67 dB comment[4]: TITLE=A Saucerful of Secrets comment[5]: ARTIST=Pink Floyd comment[6]: ALBUM=A Saucerful of Secrets comment[7]: TRACKNUMBER=05 comment[8]: DATE=1968 METADATA block #3 type: 1 (PADDING) is la...

...racks one by one. grip knows that all the tracks are on a single album, but FLAC sees them one at a time. I put the --replay-gain option on the FLAC command line, so it emits four comments into the vorbis commebnt block, e.g.: comment[9]: REPLAYGAIN_TRACK_PEAK=0.99996948 comment[10]: REPLAYGAIN_TRACK_GAIN=-2.15 dB comment[11]: REPLAYGAIN_ALBUM_PEAK=0.99996948 comment[12]: REPLAYGAIN_ALBUM_GAIN=-2.15 dB Unfortunately, the album numbers are simply a repeat of the track numbers since FLAC did not "see" all the tracks at once. I can get grip to compute and emit the album replay gain...

...8800596 MD5 signature: 9e471211972413ceb8febcdc77ef9d68 METADATA block #1 type: 4 (VORBIS_COMMENT) is last: false length: 439 vendor string: Lavf57.83.100 comments: 14 comment[0]: REPLAYGAIN_ALGORITHM=ITU-R BS.1770 comment[1]: REPLAYGAIN_REFERENCE_LOUDNESS=-18.00 comment[2]: REPLAYGAIN_TRACK_GAIN=8.53 dB comment[3]: REPLAYGAIN_TRACK_PEAK=0.218024 comment[4]: REPLAYGAIN_ALBUM_GAIN=-0.03 dB comment[5]: REPLAYGAIN_ALBUM_PEAK=0.695334 comment[6]: encoder=Lavf57.83.100 comment[7]: ARTIST=Hirilorn comment[8]: TITLE=Return of the Druids comment[9]: TRACKNUMBER=01 co...

...aygain 18900 (18900 x 1) ... OK > Testing FLAC replaygain 22050 (22050 x 1) ... OK > Testing FLAC replaygain 24000 (24000 x 1) ... OK > Testing FLAC replaygain 28000 (28000 x 1) ... OK > Testing FLAC replaygain 32000 (32000 x 1) ... ERROR, Expected -14.00 > db instead of comment[1]: REPLAYGAIN_TRACK_GAIN=-14.08 dB > OK > Testing FLAC replaygain 36000 (36000 x 1) ... OK > Testing FLAC replaygain 37800 (37800 x 1) ... OK > Testing FLAC replaygain 44100 (44100 x 1) ... OK > Testing FLAC replaygain 48000 (48000 x 1) ... OK > Testing FLAC replaygain 96000 (48000 x 2) ... OK > Testin...

If I use flac to encode with the --replay-gain option, I get a warning about the --no-padding option... "NOTE: --replay-gain may leave a small PADDING block even with --no-padding" ...even though I'm not using --no-padding. And the file does end up with a small padding block, so changing tags is slow. I'd fixed this bug in my own copy of flac 1.1.4, but forgot to submit the

...mber=2 --list bs.1770/test.flac METADATA block #2 type: 4 (VORBIS_COMMENT) is last: false length: 351 vendor string: reference libFLAC 1.3.0 20130526 comments: 9 comment[0]: REPLAYGAIN_ALGORITHM=ITU-R BS.1770 comment[1]: REPLAYGAIN_REFERENCE_LOUDNESS=-18.00 comment[2]: REPLAYGAIN_TRACK_GAIN=-11.84 dB comment[3]: REPLAYGAIN_TRACK_PEAK=1.220055 comment[4]: REPLAYGAIN_TRACK_RANGE=11.01 dB comment[5]: REPLAYGAIN_ALBUM_GAIN=-11.84 dB comment[6]: REPLAYGAIN_ALBUM_RANGE=11.01 dB comment[7]: REPLAYGAIN_ALBUM_PEAK=1.220055 comment[8]: encoder=Lavf57.46.100 Note,...

On 24-04-13 14:34, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > That's an error in the awk script, which is embedded in the shell > script. I know GNU awk supports lshift, maybe BSD awk doesn't. I'll > investigate that futher. On my system awk links to mawk 1.3.3 >> I don't know why, but the test continues and says all tests passed while >> that clearly isn't the

...r *formatstr; /* formatted output */ +struct comment_key { + const char *key; /* includes the '=' for programming convenience */ + const char *formatstr; /* formatted output */ } vorbis_comment_keys[] = { {"TRACKNUMBER=", N_("Track number:")}, {"REPLAYGAIN_TRACK_GAIN=", N_("ReplayGain (Track):")}, diff -urN -X diff.ignore ogg123.orig/status.c ogg123/status.c --- ogg123.orig/status.c Tue Mar 19 10:50:09 2002 +++ ogg123/status.c Sat Oct 5 14:28:02 2002 @@ -40,8 +40,8 @@ void write_buffer_state_string (char *dest, buffer_stats_t *buf_stats) {...