search for: rephrase

I was mistaken as to needing the virtual address of the section , but really need to know the virtual address of the beginning of the function that contains the label whose symbol expression we have. I have a case where I the expression (MCSymbolRefExpr) is the offset from the beginning of the function. AsmPrinter::EmitJumpTableEntry() calls

On 08/19/2015 07:54 PM, Victor Kaplansky wrote: > On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 10:43:46AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >> >> On 08/16/2015 09:42 PM, Victor Kaplansky wrote: >>> Clarify general description of the mac, status and >>> max_virtqueue_pairs fields. Specifically, the old description is >>> vague about configuration layout and fields offsets when some of

On 08/16/2015 09:42 PM, Victor Kaplansky wrote: > Clarify general description of the mac, status and > max_virtqueue_pairs fields. Specifically, the old description is > vague about configuration layout and fields offsets when some of > the fields are non valid. > > Also clarify that validity of two status bits depends on two > different feature flags. > > Signed-off-by:

On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 10:43:46AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > > On 08/16/2015 09:42 PM, Victor Kaplansky wrote: > > Clarify general description of the mac, status and > > max_virtqueue_pairs fields. Specifically, the old description is > > vague about configuration layout and fields offsets when some of > > the fields are non valid. > > > > Also

On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 10:43:46AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > > On 08/16/2015 09:42 PM, Victor Kaplansky wrote: > > Clarify general description of the mac, status and > > max_virtqueue_pairs fields. Specifically, the old description is > > vague about configuration layout and fields offsets when some of > > the fields are non valid. > > > > Also

On Sat, May 9, 2015 at 12:55 AM, peter dalgaard <pdalgd at gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 09 May 2015, at 02:53 , Henrik Bengtsson <henrik.bengtsson at ucsf.edu> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I spotted what looks like another(*) mistake in 'R Language >> Definition' on how subsetting should work. In Section 'Indexing >> matrices and

Clarify general description of the mac, status and max_virtqueue_pairs fields. Specifically, the old description is vague about configuration layout and fields offsets when some of the fields are non valid. Also clarify that validity of two status bits depends on two different feature flags. Signed-off-by: Victor Kaplansky <victork at redhat.com> --- content.tex | 42

...y not letting your clients contact the AD DC. > > One of the first things that the migration to AD script does is to > obtain the SID from the NT4-style domain. This SID is then used for > the new AD domain and AD always take precedence over an NT4-style PDC. > > Rowland Let me rephrase the question. Just for my understanding. If a client has communicated with an AD DC, but we now want to roll back. If we remove the AD DC from the network, is it possible to get the client to communicate with the NT4-style PDC again? kr

Hi All, Is it necessary to always have a controller per model? Rephrased: Would you end up jumping through hoops in the future if you have a controller called Customer in which you add methods to create new companies as well as new contacts? Thanx Regards, Gerard. -- "Who cares if it doesn''t do anything? It was made with our new Triple-Iso-Bifurc...

On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 10:26:31AM +0100, Stephan Roth via samba wrote: >Let me rephrase the question in hope for an answer: > >Is it at all feasible to identify the operating system of a client? no, not really. We try to match by the list of supported SMB dialects in the SMB1 negprot, but that is really just guesswork. -slow -- Ralph Boehme, Samba Team https:...

I'm going to rephrase my question Are any of you using any time of single signon technology to interact with active directory in a development project? I'd like to be able to grab the authentication with a user first authenticates as a domain admin via, say Apache, and then re-use this auth to give this admin a l...

...ify that this actually happens in practice with llvm-gcc and >> gcc. > > If that's already the case (which I'll gladly believe), where does the > performance overhead for virtual functions come from? > (Just curious.) I don't understand what you're asking. Please rephrase. -Chris -- http://nondot.org/sabre/ http://llvm.org/

...e > function, we assume that it will not call @llvm.invariant.group.barrier(). > " > This part really really bugs me. We generally try to assume minimal > knowledge of external functions (i.e. they can do anything) and this > assumption would invert that. Is there a way we can rephrase the proposal > which avoids the need for this? I'm not quite clear what this assumption > buys us. > > This is because without it the optimization will be useless. For example: A* a = new A; a->foo(); //outline virtual a->foo(); If we will assume that foo calls @llvm.invaria...

...ed state accross requests and users without involving IO, i.e. use memory. My current understanding is that for each request a new process ist spawn and therefore it gets its own memory. So no sharing can take place between requests? Do I understand this right? For those who know Java, let me rephrase that to prevent missunderstandings? Is there any equivalent to using the Application Context in J2EE, a Singleton or static class members to store objects? Cheers, Mariano _______________________________________________ Rails mailing list Rails-1W37MKcQCpIf0INCOvqR/iCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.or...

OK, let me rephrase this. What is the preferred way to install llvm + llvm- gcc onto a fedora system? Here is what I used: ../llvm-gcc4.2-2.5.source/configure --enable-languages=c,c++ --program- prefix=llvm make make install ../llvm-2.5/configure --enable-optimized --prefix=/usr/local make make install

...> What guarantees that this wait will terminate? > > It seems fairly clear to me from the break statement a couple lines up; > if we were passed __GFP_WAIT we terminate iff we succesfully allocated a > tag. If we weren't passed __GFP_WAIT we never actually sleep. OK ;) Let me rephrase. What guarantees that a tag will become available? If what we have here is an open-coded __GFP_NOFAIL then that is potentially problematic.

...> What guarantees that this wait will terminate? > > It seems fairly clear to me from the break statement a couple lines up; > if we were passed __GFP_WAIT we terminate iff we succesfully allocated a > tag. If we weren't passed __GFP_WAIT we never actually sleep. OK ;) Let me rephrase. What guarantees that a tag will become available? If what we have here is an open-coded __GFP_NOFAIL then that is potentially problematic.

...ples do stress the specific bugs that could be found, which is what I had in mind: >> >> + Copy-paste infrastructure could be used to build other "goodies". Some >> +examples and possible applications are: >> >> Is this intentional? If not, maybe we could rephrase a bit with more emphasis on bug finding. I would also make it a requirement to use the infrastructure for bug detection. > Well, partially yes, I wanted to have the project description as broad as possible so that interested students to specialized in a direction, in which they are most comforta...

On 11.02.19 11:37, Udo Kaune via samba wrote: > Am 11.02.19 um 11:30 schrieb Ralph Böhme via samba: >> On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 10:26:31AM +0100, Stephan Roth via samba wrote: >>> Let me rephrase the question in hope for an answer: >>> >>> Is it at all feasible to identify the operating system of a client? >> >> no, not really. We try to match by the list of supported SMB dialects >> in the SMB1 negprot, but that is really just guesswork. >> >&g...

Sorry, if it was answered already elsewhere. Where exactly are the current EL6 builds done? Or rephrased: I would like to look into the state of following security update: mysql-5.1.73-8.el6_8.src.rpm Looking into https://git.centos.org/repositories/ http://cbs.centos.org http://buildlogs.centos.org/ shows mostly EL7 stuff. Just curious, LF